Round Up: Wings Roll 5-2
Here's a look around the internet and some of my opinions on the win.
- Ross McKeon of PuckDaddy comments on the ineptitude of the Wings PK:
- Minor penalty: The Red Wings surrendered a power-play goal for the 10th straight playoff game, a franchise record. Hey, these guys have go to do something wrong sometime
- Matt Saler of On the Wings puts in pretty well about Kane and Toews:
- Toews and Kane hardly played at all (14:45, 15:10) and while they weren’t unnoticeable, they didn’t make the impact you’d expect from them.
- How good was the Mule-Z-Cleary line yesterday? Accounting for all goals but the Sammy goal. The Sammy-Fil-Hudler line played great too, good to see great production in the absence of Hossa and Datsyuk. 7 points for the Z line, 2 for the Fil line. Look for more great play as the series continues.
- Ozzie played well despite the 2 goals. The 2 goals were really not that bad in my opinion. I know the first one was one that made you go "oh. dude. weak" but in Ozzie's defense that guy did come out of nowhere. The second goal, double deflection on the shot and the puck kicked out to the side, not much he could do after committing to the shot from the point.
- I hate the Hawks as much as the next Wings fan but I'm glad Adam Burish escaped relatively okay from this, you never want to see a player get injured like that.
- SamFels over at the rival's Second City Hockey puts forth something interesting:
- -Datsyuk looks hurt. He had an effective game, but not a dominating one, and I've probably just woke him up. But he looks a step slower than normal.
- Ozzie gives credit to Lidstrom for the win. Credit well due too. Big game from Kronwall too, led all players in ice time while earning a +1 rating and blocked 2 shots. He and Stuart put in solid ice time and were great defensively. Stuart had 4 hits, a blocked shot, and a takeaway in 23+ minutes. Good production out of the #2 unit that's for sure.
- Lidstrom and Rafalski were matched up against Toews and Kane nearly all game long. Not good for the Blackhawks that the Wings matched the young guns with nearly every shift. If Lids and Rafalski weren't enough trouble, Kane and Toews also had to deal with Z, Cleary, and Mule. Could be a factor that the Wings could try and exploit, Kane and Toews both had a -3 rating and looked vulnerable on the defensive side of the puck.
That's it for now, check back later for some more stuff.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Game 1
I think it is advantage Red Wings when it comes to Chicago rolling four lines. The Anaheim series was tough because they constantly played the Getzlaf line. That meant that Zetterberg/Franzen/Cleary/Lidstrom had to play a lot of minutes. Now with Quenville rolling four lines, Z’s line with Lidstrom and Rafalski can be out there for all of Kane and Toews shifts and still have some shifts against Havlat. This also helps to get the other lines get going too. I still think Datsyuk and Hossa have played good games this postseason. They played great yesterday and Datsyuk set Hossa up on some really good chances in which the Hawks were just able to block. They will get quicker as the series rolls on as they get more chances. This Chicago team defense is nothing like Anaheim’s. Chicago has great speed, but if they turn it over the Wings will be able to quickly come back on the attack because Chicago’s forwards aren’t as good backcheckers. The Detroit forwards also showed speed and the ability to backcheck in the neutral zone.
Exactly
You’re right on about Hoss/Pavs. They’ve played great but just haven’t gotten the puck in the net. I think by the end of the series, each could have at least 3 goals in the round. Like you said, CHI’s defense isn’t as good and the forwards don’t backcheck like the Ducks. Hopefully we can keep the pace on our side and keep the Hawks on their heels.
www.wingingitinmotown.com
by Casey Richey on May 18, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Like I’ve said over at second city hockey, Chicago’s at its best when it can play a hybrid skill/physical game, because they have players who can skate as well as a good physical contingent.
Their problem is that Detroit can outskill them, so unless they really commit to the physical game, and really backcheck hard and consistently, you’re going to have what you saw yesterday, Detroit having the space to set up and cycle…
The other edge of the sword is that if they really do go physical, it will be hard for Chicago to stay out of the box, another situation in which the Wings excel….so if yesterday was any indication, the Blackhawks are kinda stuck between a rock and a hard place in terms of how to approach this Red Wings team.

by 















