Ott's Controversial Goal Hands Wings 3-2 Shootout Loss
It's rare to have a game between the ninth-place and 11th-place teams in a conference in January have the feel of April. This one had that feel, complete with a call at the end of the game that will be talked about for a while.
The Red Wings gave up a two-goal lead and lost to the Dallas Stars in a shootout, 3-2. But it was the lone goal in the shootout by Steve Ott that will be talked about for a while.
Ott's shot was knocked down by Jimmy Howard's glove, but was rolling as it neared the goal line. Howard covered up the puck, while swiping his glove forward out of the goal. Rob Martell, who was behind the net and to the right of Howard, skated in quickly (almost banging his head against the pipes) and waved the goal off.
But Mike Leggo, the other referee who was skating in with Ott, felt that the puck did go into the net. The video replay room in Toronto ruled that the replays were inconclusive. But no one in Dallas made it clear that the original call on the ice was a goal. So when Martell announced it was a goal, it appeared that the call had been overturned.
The controversial ending marred a game that featured playoff-level intensity from both teams, including a physical third period that saw Leggo and Martell put away the whistles and let the two teams simply go at it. Ott seemed obsessed with drawing someone into a fight, taunting both Brad Stuart and Todd Bertuzzi. Both teams saw heavy hitting and each managed to score one power-play goal. Howard ended up with 28 saves, which Alex Auld had 26 saves for the Stars.
Bertuzzi opened the scoring, taking a great setup by Henrik Zetterberg, skating in, and with Jeff Woywitka putting his stick in (and drawing a negated penalty), put the puck on his backhand, and put in past Auld for his 13th goal of the season. Nicklas Lidstrom picked up the second assist with the great starting pass.
Then, with Mike Modano sitting on a slashing penalty, Brian Rafalski took advantage of a Zetterberg shot that bounced off Bertuzzi (handcuffing Auld) and put the puck in a nearly open net for his third goal of the year. Again, Lidstrom picked up the second assist.
But the Stars came back in the second period. Brad Richards took advantage of a too many men penalty for the Red Wings by skating down the right-side boards along and taking a great shot that Howard couldn't handle for his 14th goal of the season.
In the third, the Stars took advantage of a questionable non-call. Krystofer Barch was in the crease, his rear end in contact with him, which stopped Howard from moving to his right, where Loui Eriksson was set up by Tom Wandell and put it in for his team-leading 19th goal. Howard lept up and immediately started arguing that he was interfered with, but the words were for naught.
In the shootout, it was a series of misses and saves: James Neal, Richards, Eriksson, Modano, and Stephane Robidas all had shots blocked by Howard; the Wings had Zetterberg, Bertuzzi, Valtteri Filppula, and Dan Cleary had their shots handled by Auld, while Datsuyk missed high on a backhand and Patrick Eaves missed the chance to go to a seventh round when he also went high.
The Red Wings come home for an early Sunday matchup against the Chicago Blackhawks.
Player of the game: Jimmy Howard. As the Red Wings defense effectively shut down in the third period, Howard stood on his head to make some great saves to keep the Wings in this one.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
of course the Kings just won now too
they were down 2 goals in the 3rd period and still won…we were up 2 today and lost…ugh
TULO = 2010 MVP!
LETS GO WINGS!
It's hard to even think of where to start on the blown call
So I won’t. It’s over, I’m pissed, but it’s not gonna change.
Not many teams lose when leading after the first period. Even fewer lose when leading after the second. The Red Wings let the Stars back in the game after leading 2-0; they had plenty of opportunity to put the game away, regardless of any missed/questionable calls.
The Red Wings have not outshot an opponent since January 4th or allowed fewer than 30 shots against since December 31st. If it weren’t for above average goaltending, this team would be closer to the bottom of the league than the middle.
The other no goal.
How about the goal when the Dallas player is laying on Howard. If that was Holmstrom I guarantee he goes to the box and that goal is waived off. The nhl refs are a joke.
You got that right. I also love the other times Howard got bowled over and the 4 missed high sticks… none more obvious than that one in OT. It’s just amazing to me that the way Dallas played that they only got one penalty. The officials did everything in their power to help Dallas. What is it about Dallas and bad reffing. The May goal earlier this year, and all of the Homer screening goals called back. Just sickening.
when is enough enough
it seems to me that the league from bettman on down has decided that the wings are not going to make the playoffs. by my conservative count this is now 6 points that the wings have been ripped off of this season. it could be more. 4 high sticks with no calls, an obvious goalie interference, a boarding call, roughing calls not made. i counted 3 interference calls not made either. in some fairness i did see the wings get away with 3 penalties. none as bad as the stars ones however. the league always has an excuse for when they bone the wings. i think its time for the owners and gm of the wings to go public and call for an investigation of this ever more blatant game fixing. as a fan of what i consider the best sport ever i am sick of politics ruining my sport. burrows started something the wings should have been doing since last years finals.
i completely agree with your comment. I was just saying after that game i now believe that the league is trying to keep detroit out of the playoffs. it’s bad enough that they have had to deal with injuries but screwing detroit out of wins is just wrong. not calling penalties when there should be. and for fans who say wings fan just complain to much we have a right to we have so much crap called against us but we deal with it. it would just be fair if some calls would come our way for a change. cause i’m sick of this crap.
On Yahoo sports, the comments after the game… One fan, I believe a Dallas fan, called it a bad call… but then had the balls to say that historically Detroit usually has these calls go their way. I LMAO on that comment. Guess they didn’t see the Brad May goal that was just not counted, the Datsyuk goal called back in the ‘08 playoffs because Tomas Holmstrom was outside the crease and screening Turco. Plus MANY others. I know I would need more than two hands to count these BS calls over the last 10 years, and calls that have gone the Wings way, when maybe they shouldn’t have… only 1 hand needed. Just sickening.
I think my entire neihborhood heard me yelling BS about 30 times regarding the Ott call. It’s called a goal on the ice, the replay is inconclusive and an on ice ref changes the call when the original call was made by the ref in perfect position to make the right call? BS! And to benefit such a thug like Ott. I’m embarassed to admit I flipped my coffee table. BS!
by katiebarthedoor on Jan 17, 2010 7:36 AM CST reply actions
i like that type of spirit
Welcome to Winging It first off. It’s good to see that type of enthusiasm!
When I think about it, I’m shocked at how bad of a system the refs have for a shootout. I’m not exactly sure what they could do better but it’s bad that a guy 30 feet away makes the call.
by Casey Richey on Jan 17, 2010 8:04 AM CST up reply actions
I was watching it while waiting for my school's hockey game to start
about 15 of us were yelling at the tv when they gave Ott the goal. absolute bunk. how do you overturn the ruling of a ref whose face is literally three feet from the puck and isn’t blocked in any way? i bet that ref got pretty angry afterwards; i know i would have, and i’m a referee myself.
I Like Pie

by 















