Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Enhance Your Experience: Let's see that from another angle

I just don't know if it could keep up with Darren Helm.

Today, we wrap up the trio of posts on enhancing your experience as a fan of the NHL. JJ brought you a piece on high definition broadcasts and Graham wrote up a piece on fan/player interaction. I'm going to try my hand at it today with a suggestion as to something that I think would help enhance the fan experience.

There's no doubt about it, we thrive on visual stimulation when it comes to sports. Radio is all well and good and is a fine institution but does it really do justice to a Pavel Datsyuk dangle or a Nicklas Lidstrom stick check? I think you'll all agree with me that it doesn't. For proof, how many different angles do you usually see a replay of a goal from? Usually, it's somewhere between three to five different angles. Do you need all of those different angles to see the end result? No, not at all. But, what those different angles do help to accomplish is a better sense of the spatial mapping of the players on the ice surface. How close was the goalie to saving the puck? How many times did the puck bounce before he was able to settle it down? How far away from the defender was the forward when he let the shot go? We love to see this stuff, even if it's in a sometimes overwhelming amount that we see it. We love to see every view possible to try and get a feel for what the players are seeing on the ice as they make the plays. 

So what's my solution? Take the jump.

Star-divide

There are already so many camera angles available already but you know what? I'm greedy and I want more.

Perhaps the one I would like to see the most is the one that is pictured above. It frequents the fields of collegiate and professional football fields but how would it work in the NHL? I think it would work incredibly well in an NHL arena. A NHL rink is 200 feet long, compared to the 300 feet of a football field. That 100 foot difference doesn't sound like all that much but when you think about how fast the overhead cams move up and down a field and apply that to an ice rink and you could have some incredible results. Imagine the view you'd have flying down the ice on a play like Darren Helm's breakaway goal against the Ducks in the playoffs or the over head view you could have during your team's power play cycle.   

The potential of something like this is incredible to think about and it might even help out in goal reviews. The impact on a fan in attendance would be minimal too as the wire cams are usually not that obstructive to a view. However, with every plan there are problems with a system like that. How do you work the cables around the scoreboard in center ice? Would the wires and camera interfere with high clears? I think this is all stuff that would be relatively easy to work out to implement something as potentially incredible as this.

Another thing I would like to see is just more cameras. I think it'd be nice to have a camera in the boards along each blue line, eliminating any guess work on angles for offsides plays or determining if a puck left the zone. Cameras inside the boards themselves would be pretty neat too. Not necessarily along the endboards or anywhere that receives a lot of puck action but a camera on each side of each zone (6 total) would add a unique view to watching the game. 

It's also kind of sad that the sport has been televised for so long with out any really good angles to determine whether a puck completely crossed  the line. Really? We're going to rely on the camera that's like 75 feet above the goal line or the one in the net that always seems to be looking at the complete opposite side of the goal at the crucial time? Is it that hard to put cameras just inside the goal posts? 

I thought about some other camera options like if you put a camera in a ref's helmet or a player's helmet. Yeah that'd be cool for the first few times you see it and then you'd want to throw up because of all the motion. However, there are some players and refs that I would like to see have cameras put into their helmets:

  • Pavel Datsuyk--so you could see the desperation and frustration in the faces of those defending him
  • Darren Helm rear view cam--so you can see players busting their asses to catch up
  • Brad Watson--so you can see exactly what the hell he saw to call something off
  • Nicklas Lidstrom--so you could see perfection for once
  • Niklas Kronwall--so you can see the "oh shit" expression
  • Ryan Getzlaf innerhelmet cam--so you can count exactly how many hairs are left on his dome
  • Zdeno Chara--so you can see the world through the eyes of a giant
  • Brett Lebda--so you can scope the same girls in the crowd that the Lebdanator does.
  • Rick Rypien--so you can see what Minnesota fans look like up close
  • Kyle Wellwood--so you can see a case of Mallomars up close
  • Nikolai Khabibulin--so you can see red lights going off in game and blue lights after the game
  • Tomas Kopecky--so you can see how often he looks at Marian Hossa or misses an opportunity
  • Matt Cooke--so you can see the looks of disgust from players around the league and a close-up of Evander Kane's fist
  • Gary Bettman--so you can see what the inside of the Keebler Elves Tree looks like
  • Keith Ballard--so you can see how often he looks at a goalie
  • Any opposing goalie playing against Tomas Holmstrom--on second thought.....

Okay, done with the joking around. In all seriousness, I think some of the above cameras would be really awesome to have and the overhead on a wire would be awesome for hockey. Of course all these cameras would cost big money and it may not be something that teams could do for every broadcast but for national broadcasts or playoff action it would be really awesome to see. And like I said before, I'm greedy.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Brett Lebda—so you can scope the same girls in the crowd that the Lebdanator does.

Hahaha. Awesome.

by J.J. from Kansas on Nov 12, 2010 12:11 PM CST reply actions  

I’d love to see RFIDs in each player’s uniform, and then have equipment along the edge of the rink to track exactly where each player is at any time (as well as the puck). This would allow for real-time apps (on computers or mobile devices) to show the players on the ice at any time, and the plays as they develop, especially when you don’t have video to watch. It would really help in scorekeeping and game statistics – you could easily figure out time of possession, time spent in offensive/defensive/neutral zone, and see any breakdowns in plays using raw data, than just hoping you have a video angle of a particular play. It would also probably solve most “is it a goal or not?” problems, you could also put something in the goal so it can verify if/when a puck crosses the line.

This technology is actually pretty cheap, too. I don’t know why they don’t do this, it would help so much and really catapult the game ahead of the competition with respect to using technology for analyzing the game.

by jameshstephenson on Nov 12, 2010 12:47 PM CST reply actions  

FSSW tested this idea previously

at some Dallas Stars home games a season or two ago. It didn’t stick yet and from the seats was a bit of a distraction actually as the black camera shows up in your peripheral vision against the white background a lot more than on a dark green field perhaps. Still, perhaps with further refinement it could be useful.

by BrettB29 on Nov 12, 2010 12:58 PM CST reply actions  

Goalline technology

I’ve often wondered whether it would be possible to have some sort of technology where the puck triggers something when it crosses the goalline, like a laser or something like that. I think some of the issues of whether the puck is in or not could be solved if this were available.

Like to keep your communication short and to the point? Follow me on Twitter

by Amerinadian on Nov 12, 2010 2:19 PM CST reply actions  

I have just one request...

Only use alternate camera angles for replay. There is nothing more than switching camera angles to zoom in on a play in the corner, meanwhile the puck is on it’s was to the slot and a goal is scored and all we see is dude in the corner either getting hit or admiring a pass.

There is ONE good camera angle for watching hockey live, that’s the normal center ice camera.

by dewman8810 on Nov 12, 2010 2:51 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Detroit Red Wings.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Reasons why the 2011-12 Detroit Red Wings season was great

Recent FanPosts

De_small
Should we Re-sign Abby? Am I the only one?
Small
Parise vs Suter
Small
What's next on Defense?
Small
More Thoughts on What Went Wrong
Small
Corey Perry? Strange coincidence
Small
Anyone else getting scared of the worst-case-scenario?
Epic_sax_guy_plz_by_epicsaxguyplz-d31pmuj_small
Great Moments in St. Louis Sports History
Small
Looking beyond next year...
Epic_sax_guy_plz_by_epicsaxguyplz-d31pmuj_small
Other Recent Personal Bests

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


The Gentlemen

Images_small J.J. from Kansas

Simpsonsabbey_small Amerinadian

Dsc07546_small JeffHancock41

Editor

Jabdelkadercamp08_small stripe

Author

Small Robocop

Photochop Guru

Whiteknight_small Josh Howard