Pass the Smelling Salts: Wild 4 - Red Wings 3
You still awake? Me neither. The Red Wings entered play on Friday night looking to extend their winning streak to five games, but unfortunately they forgot there are three periods in the game, ultimately losing to the Minnesota Wild 4-3 in OT. This was an absolutely brutal game to watch, as there was little in the way of flow or excitement for most of the game.
The Wild opened the scoring in the first period when Brent Burns ripped a wrist shot past a number of players as a Wild power play expired. They doubled their lead early in the second when noted goal-scorer Cal Clutterbuck scored an ugly goal from behind the net. The Wings decided to score a last-minute goal of their own at the end of the second when Darren Helm finally eliminated the "0" on his goal-tally sheet. The Wings tied it early in the third on a power play goal of their own, this one on a Johan Franzen shot that was deflected in off a Wild defenseman. A little under 3 minutes later, Patrick Eaves scored on a wraparound to give the Wings their first lead of the game. The Wild, for some inexplicable reason, still trapped for the rest of the third period, even though they were trailing. However, the Wild tied the game with less than 2 minutes to go when Mikko Koivu pounced on a bad rebound by Jimmy Howard, sending the game to OT. The two teams went back and forth in OT, but with less than a minute left John Madden eluded Nicklas Lidstrom and popped in a cross-ice pass, giving the Wild the victory. Down that cup of coffee and follow me after the jump for the analysis.
Let's get right to the bullets:
- When the game started and they said Jose Theodore was starting, this was what I wrote down: "Wings will either win big or get 40 shots and lose because he's really good". You can guess which option I was hoping for.
- The fourth line was by far the best line of the night for the Wings, and as I've said before, that's nice for them, but bad for the team. Darren Helm and Patrick Eaves, regardless of who was on their line with them (Tomas Holmstrom, Justin Abdelkader, Al Sobotka) were flying all over the ice and generated great offensive chances. I said early in the game that this might be the game Helm pots his first, and once again, I was right (my arm is sore from patting myself on the back so hard). They also held the NHL's #1 power play off the scoresheet, and while that's impressive, it was the fact that the Wild are the league's best power play that shocks me more. The only time I use "Wild" and "offense" in the same sentence is when I say "I really take offense to how boring the Wild are".
- Jonathan Ericsson, yet again, was the Wings' best defenseman tonight. I've never been a huge E fan, but I can get on board with this new version. He went from being a solid #6 guy in the playoffs to a huge rookie disappointment to....whatever we've got now. I know there are a ton of nicknames out there for him right now, but I'd like to bestow another one on him in honour of this "new" Ericsson: E2.0.
- Uh, Mike? You remember how you talked about wanting the PP to be better, and you wanted to get it going? One ugly deflection goal does not count as "improvement". That blown 5-on-3 sums up their struggles all year so far: no puck movement, bad passes, and shots not hitting the net. It is the one area of their game that has not gotten better, and is of great concern.
- Jimmy Howard had an off night; there's no way around that. He was caught out of position on the second goal, and gave up the big rebound on the tying marker late in the third. He's been lights out lately, so he gets the benefit of the doubt. However, one of the big issues with him last year was his rebound control, and it's a little disconcerting to see that raise its ugly head again. However, on the bright side, he showed his fiery side when he kept getting run into early in the first. I love that our goalie is a bit of a bad-ass.
- I'll be perfectly honest: I missed a good chunk of the first period. Part of that was because I was spending time with the family, and part of that was the coma the Wild put me in after they scored. It's been said before, and I'll repeat it here: the Wild have got to be the most boring team in the world. Once they get a lead, they just sit back and trap. Even sitting here, writing about them is making me sl...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
- Yes, Johan Franzen scored a goal. No, that does not mean he had a good game. Are you like me and getting sick of waiting for him to "break out"? I've got an idea: instead of rotating Drew Miller and Patrick Eaves, sit Franzen for a game. Let him see what happens when you don't do the things you're being paid to do, like use your body, create some semblance of offense, and hit a guy once in a while. Right now Franzen is playing on the edges, and he needs to be in the middle of everything. He always plays better when he's mad, and what better way to piss him off than taking away the one thing that matters to every NHL player: his ice time? I think it's an idea worth pursuing, but it will never happen.
- I'm not really going to get in to the rest of the team, because outside of a handful of guys, no one really played well. The first line was very quiet (again); the second line was good, but not great; and the third line was also good but not great. It was just one of those games. To be completely honest, while the Wings did have a lead late in the third, this was not a game they ultimately deserved to win. They got away with only showing up for one period against the Blues; it was not meant to be tonight.
There was no real consensus on player of the game, so we're putting it up to a vote. Also, since no one predicted a Wing loss (I came close - should have stuck with my gut), no one got the score right. Next up is a rare Sunday afternoon tilt against the Flames as the Wings wrap up their homestand. Game is at 5 pm EST, so make sure you pull yourself away from your NFL football to see if the Wings can get ready for their road trip with a win.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
For something new
I’d like to see Eaves up there with Dats and Z to throw some energy there. Or even better, drop Hank to line 2. Mix it up. I didn’t see the game tonight, but it sounds like another ho-hum performance by what should be one of the best lines in the league.
I'm bad at finishing in one post.
And I hate to say it but I did expect a loss tonight. They had been winning too much (even if they didn’t deserve it) and they were bound to lose. I’m just glad it happened in OT and we get the pity point. Dats is usually alive for games against Calgary, hopefully he jump starts on Sunday.
That was probably the most boring game I’ve ever watched. But I have to admit, the Wild don’t just play the trap, they command it. ALL night long, I couldn’t find a single good passing lane, and because the Wings are such a puck possession team, that really screwed us over. We should have just shot more and hoped for a lucky bounce or rebound opportunity because there was no way we could get a good pass through that trap.
I think thats the reason our 4th line was the best; they don’t think about making pretty plays because they simply don’t have the skills some of our top liners have (they are plenty skilled, but not close to Datsyuk, Z, etc). They played with energy and charged the net. Thats the only way to beat a trap team.
Or we can be Philly and thug it up like they did against NJ last year in the playoffs, but the Wings are too high-class to do that.
The 4th line also used their speed
Every other line was just too slow. I am all for sitting Happy and putting Miller and Eaves in Sunday.
E made one scary pass up the middle from the side of our net but other than that the metamorphosis continues from Big E to Big Error to Riggy Shitbox to E2.0. Love it!
I confess watching the Flames demolish the Hawks afterwards was a delight. Let’s just hope they’ve got all of that out of their system.
Love the Schadenfraude...
Sure, the core has finally landed. I mean with a thud…
I celebrate Festivus!!!
What I like about the fourth liners (especially Abdelkader), aside from everything already mentioned about them playing a simpler, speedy, tougher game, is that they have a tendency to shoot at a goalie’s skates. Those are low-percentage shots, but they create rebounds.
by J.J. from Kansas on Nov 20, 2010 9:16 AM CST up reply actions
Hudler needs to come off of the power play. He doesn’t create, he is just kind of there.
There were a couple of times earlier this season where the lines got a little bit shuffled due to partial changes and Z and Eaves ended up on the ice at the same time, and it looked like they had a bit of chemistry going on.
Bring more of the 4th line guys out in the overtime. For one thing, they are used to playing as a 4 person unit due to their penalty killing. For another, their young legs and speed would create more opportunities.
by Zachary Jonas MacRostie on Nov 20, 2010 10:07 AM CST reply actions
YES
Right before the shift where Minnesota scored the OT game winner, I silently asked Babcock (read: told my sister, Anne from Kansas who was watching with me) to put Helm on the ice because I liked what he had been doing and his speed would kill at four-on-four.
Also agreed on Hudler. He’s got serious skills, but if he’s not using them then he needs to be replaced with somebody who’s going to use the skills they do have to their full effectiveness. I’ve been having an argument with a Blues fan about how 96.6% of 20,066 is larger than 100% of 19,150. I think the same concept can be applied to Hudler. Except he’s only giving 80% of his 20,066. So put somebody out there who’s going to give 100% of their 19,150.
I apologize for how convoluted that got…
by J.J. from Kansas on Nov 20, 2010 10:19 AM CST up reply actions
I agree with you 96.6 . The other 3.4 was used to think about ham, which is weird because I usually dedicate about 18.7% of my brain power to ham. I find it really weird that fan bases make such a big deal the filling of seats. Who gives a crap? If you want to worry about empty seats, worry about the teams that are only filling 70% of their arenas. That’s what hurts the league. These band wagon fanbases that just start filling their rinks after their team finally shows promise are a joke. I will send you your reward shortly. It’s an old coffee mug that said World’s #1 Grandpa. I scribbled out Grandpa and wrote Fan in its place. Then when your team doesn’t make the playoffs, you can drink your tears out of it while the Joe keeps selling tickets throughout the playoffs.
by Zachary Jonas MacRostie on Nov 20, 2010 11:20 AM CST up reply actions 3 recs
Hahaha
Well-put!
I want a coffee mug that says “World’s #1 Grandpa Fan” now. I mean, I am a pretty big fan of grandpas after all.
by J.J. from Kansas on Nov 20, 2010 11:42 AM CST up reply actions
AGREE!
I told my family (who had stopped snoring for the final minutes) that I didn’t get the line choices for the OT.
by InMDmissingtheD on Nov 20, 2010 11:13 AM CST up reply actions
Wild hockey reminded me of Greece winning Euro 2004
They score one, and 11 players would sit back and defend. Well it was an effective tactic as they captured the crown. Don’t think Stanley can be won that way…not atleast on Ice. On the contrary, our game was not bad. Our PP needs some serious overhaul. Our first line (like Graham mentioned) is still snoozing…we better show up against the flames…looks like they burnt the Hawk feathers last night and must be riding high…..
I celebrate Festivus!!!
Boring Wild
If the NHL really wants to boost scoring, why don’t they make the “trap” an illegal defense for the first 55 minutes of a game. Let a team use it to protect a lead in the final 5 minutes of the third, but get rid of it the rest of the game. Hockey is exciting. The trap is dull, boring and doesn’t even let the game resemble hockey!
Sure the trap is boring, but the Wild don’t have a Z, Dats, Franzen. Hell, they don’t even have a Cleary. What they do have are the kind of talent that fits the trap style of play. It’s not like you can’t light up a team that plays the trap, it’s up to you to figure out how to beat it.
by Zachary Jonas MacRostie on Nov 20, 2010 5:28 PM CST up reply actions

by 















