CSSI Analysis: Red Wings 4 - Ducks 0
Detroit continued their trip through California on the night with a 4-0 victory over the Anaheim Ugly Jack-O-Lanterns Ducks. Valtteri Fillpula and Johan Franzen had two points each, Cleary stayed hot, and Holmstrom got off the goal-scoring schneide, but Jimmy Howard was the story, putting together a 41-shot blanking of the California Cloacae.
Special teams wasn't much of a story on the night as there were only four total power play opportunities. Anaheim went 0-for-3, while Detroit failed to score on their lone opportunity. Yes, you read that right, the usually-goonish Ducks took only one penalty. I'd like to tell you that they got away with a ton and that the refs screwed things up, forcing the Wings to overcome, but I think the game was very fairly and consistently called. Larry Murphy said it best during the telecast when he mentioned it was a factor of puck possession and that the Wings hadn't possessed the puck much. Fortunately, Murph's confusing and frightening moment of clarity later went away as he went all Ric Flair on the broadcast when they mentioned an upcoming dollar hot dog night. Bottom line: I would watch if you re-cast The Odd Couple with Ken and Murph and had Mick and Keating as the neighbors who stop by all the time to drive the plot along.
CSSI Tracking Chart here
CSSI Methodology Explanation here
Goalie Ratings
Jimmy Howard definitely earned his shutout in this game, stopping all 41 Anaheim shots for his second 4-0 victory over the Ducks this season. His rebound control started a bit shaky, but picked up well late. He was also bailed out several times by fantastic defensive play by the guys in front of him. Regardless, he made four big saves on his way to this victory. Howard's rating on the night was +4
Scoring and plus/minus analysis after the jump
The Goals1st Period 1:09 - Detroit Goal: Johan Franzen (wrist shot) from Valtteri Filppula
Goals this early are always a good way to say hello to your opposition. This play starts off with good offensive zone pressure by the first line for the first shift of the game. Anaheim takes the puck as Lubomir Visnovski waits behind his own net for ten seconds while both teams change. When he comes out from behind the net, he tries to put a pass up the middle of the ice, but Franzen gets a piece of it. The puck deflects high in the Ducks' zone, but Filppula collects it before it gets out and carries to the right faceoff circle before trying to hit Franzen with a cross-ice pass. The pass doesn't connect, but the puck takes a favorable bounce off the boards to Franzen's stick, where he immediately turns and fires on net before Hiller can complete his move across the crease to get set. Franzen will pick up an extra half-plus for creating the turnover that creates his goal.
2nd Period 14:02 - Detroit Goal: Tomas Holmstrom (wrist shot) from Henrik Zetterberg (500th career point) and Pavel Datsyuk
On a long 2nd-period shift, the top line does a very good job controlling play on Anaheim, including two very solid instances of neutral zone pestering by Holmstrom. The Ducks eventually do get it in, but fail to create a scoring chance. Perry turns the puck over to Lidstrom, who immediately recognizes Datsyuk coming out of the zone and finds him for a pass that sends the Wings forwards up ice three-wide on an even-man rush. The Wings' forwards do an excellent job maneuvering to turn the 3-on-3 into three individual 1-on-1s, which allows each player on the line to highlight his talent. Datsyuk crosses over Holmstrom coming into the zone and heads for the boards. Datsyuk takes a defender with him while Holmstrom takes the other going to the front of the net. Meanwhile, Zetterberg shifts to the center of the ice in front of his man and collects the pass from Pavel in stride. Zetterberg immediately carries into the hole behind Pavel's defender and in front of Holmstrom's. While Visnovski struggles to come across ice to catch up to Zetterberg, Homer sets up office on front of Hiller with good position on Perry. Zetterberg throws a low backhand at Hiller, which he can't corral. Holmstrom, now with Perry so far out of position, he might as well be in the press box, slams the rebound home for Detroit's 2nd goal. Lidstrom's quick outlet pass is a vital part of this play developing and the captain will get an assist on this play.
2nd Period 18:26 - Detroit Goal: Danny Cleary (tip in) from Brian Rafalski
To start this play, Ericsson steps up on a Ducks player in the neutral zone, forcing a weak dump-in with no pressure that Abdelkader collects and carries up ice. He steps around one forward before dumping the puck in and racing into the zone to get to it first. Abdelkader continues his one-man wrecking crew as he takes two Anaheim defenders out of the play as they try to hit him. Miller collects and tries to feed Abby at the side of the goal for a stuff-in attempt that is stopped. The puck ends up back on Abby's stick as his momentum carries him behind the net. Abby tries a wraparound stuff attempt, but Hiller gets the pad down. In desperation, Andy Sutton picks the puck off Hiller's pad and tries to clear by bouncing it up the boards, but the puck goes straight to Rafalski, who unleashes a slap shot from just above the circle. Danny Cleary is standing out front and deflects it through Hiller's legs for this goal. Justin Abdelkader undoubtedly deserves an assist here and also will get a bonus plus. If anybody wants to really know what he brings to this team, this play should answer that question nicely, despite that he received no official points. Jonathan Ericsson will also get a half-plus for the neutral zone step-up that leads this play to develop.
3rd Period 19:29 - Detroit Goal: Valtteri Filppula (wrist shot) from Jonathan Ericsson and Johan Franzen
With time winding down on the shutout, the Ducks carry up ice is broken up by Ruslan Salei jumping up on a player at center ice, turning the puck over to Kronwall as the Ducks change. He immediately recognizes this and feeds to Filppula, who is streaking up the far wing for a breakaway opportunity that Hiller stops. Flip collects his own rebound and gets the puck to Franzen, who finds Ericcson at the far point. Big Rig recognizes Filppula on the back door and throws a wrister his way. Andy Sutton fails to stop the pass or the stick and Fillpula quickly redirects it home past Hiller. Rafalski came on for Kronwall and Ericsson came on for Salei as this play develops. Kronwall will get Rafalski's plus for helping develop the play and Salei will get a half-plus for forcing the turnover on the bad change. Kronwall also gets an assist for springing Flip on the breakaway.
Bonus Ratings
I feel every defenseman on the club had an excellent night, so they're each getting some bonus credit here. Here's the breakdown:
+1 to Stuart, Kronwall, Salei, and Lidstrom: These are the guys who played flawless defense. Lidstrom, Stuart, and Kronwall each had plays that broke up what would have been sure goals by playing defensively sound hockey and getting sticks in lanes. Salei was winning board battles, keeping his marks on the outside, getting in passing lanes, and being solid enough to play more even-strength minutes than any of the other three.
+0.5 to Jonathan Ericsson and Brian Rafalski: It feels weird to feel as though I'm punishing these guys by only awarding them a plus-half, so don't think of it like that. Rafalski played the most even-strength minutes of anybody on the team and was very solid. Ericsson already got a bonus half-plus for a goal and he did get caught flat-footed in the first leading to a penalty, so this half-plus bonus rating is simply the result of the net adjustments when taking all things into consideration.
+1 to Henrik Zetterberg, Tomas Holmstrom, and Pavel Datsyuk: The Eurotwins had a fantastic game together again. Their contributions on the defensive end of the ice certainly helped Howard maintain his shutout. Holmstrom was flat-out robbed twice by Hiller and very well could have had a hat trick on the night. He avoided taking any dumb penalties on this evening and was able to reign his tenacity into something very useful.
+1 to Valtteri Filppula: I was most happy with the 2nd line all night and like that they produced an official +2 on the night, but I think Filppula deserves extra credit for his aggression in attacking the puck wherever it went through all three zones on the ice. His goal was a result of very hard work and it was nice to see that get rewarded.
Honorable mentions: I'd like to give the fourth line some props for performing well on the night and helping keep momentum and energy in the Wings' favor, they just didn't wow enough. Hudler's quietness in his 11 minutes of ice time was disappointing for a guy waiting for him to break out, but he really does look like he's trying out there, so he'll keep getting a bit more of a pass than perhaps he should be. He's definitely not being actively detrimental, so I wouldn't feel right giving him a minus. I expect more though.
Next game tomorrow night against the Kings. Chris Osgood will get his first start since the BeeGees were relevant. Fortunately, the team should be pretty well rested. Nobody played more than 22 minutes in this game.
21 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Jimmy was standing on his head
I recall a time there were a lot of Howard bashers, but he is proving them wrong. Detroit is 35-4 in its last 39 regular season games. Year after year they are a force in the NHL, no matter how many changes the league makes to screw with them!
Agreed
It’s a very good time to be a Red Wings fan right now.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 4, 2010 8:37 AM CST up reply actions
In the last 39 reg season games
Detroit is actually 30-5-4. Still pretty damn good. If you turned those 39 games into an 82 game season they would have over 60 wins.
Disagree...
…on the honorable mention to Hudler. I didn’t even realize he was in the line-up until late in the 3rd when Detroit had their only Belle Tire Power Play. For a stay at home defenseman, sure, a game where you aren’t noticed (positively or negatively) is a solid game. Not the case for a 2nd/3rd line winger. I don’t know how you can argue that he’s trying out there. Abdelkader is trying. Helm is trying. Eaves is trying. Miller is trying. Hudler is coasting and contributing nothing.
How long can he be given a pass for sub-par play? I always thought Babcock’s Detroit Red Wings was a meritocracy. How can anyone justify (particularly with Draper returning tonight) Eaves, Miller, Helm, Abdelkader being benched and Hudler being on the ice? Particularly when you realize that all but Miller have more points in FEWER GAMES (Helm excepted) than Hudler?
Agree with the inference on Hudler
However, the 3 mill clams is what is probably allowing the sub par performance to be overlooked along with meritocracy. Maybe Babs is still trying to toy with him to get the best out of him. Having said that, benching him for atleast 5 games should rekindle some spark under his rear.
I celebrate Festivus!!!
by bharatwaj5 on Dec 4, 2010 2:52 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Agree with the inference on Hudler
However, the 3 mill clams is what is probably allowing the sub par performance to be overlooked along with meritocracy. Maybe Babs is still trying to toy with him to get the best out of him. Having said that, benching him for atleast 5 games should rekindle some spark under his rear.
I celebrate Festivus!!!
by bharatwaj5 on Dec 4, 2010 2:52 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Hudler is a better player than Helm, Eaves, and Milller. He’s currently not playing better than they are, but his upside comparatively is huge.
The way I can argue that he’s trying out there is because Babcock isn’t benching him with Draper’s return. Make no mistake, Babs is running a meritocracy, but it’s not based on the box score.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 4, 2010 2:56 PM CST up reply actions
yes. but curious
As to if Hudler has lost what he was primed for: a reliable point scorer… Reliable cog on the PP machine… Has his hiatus in KHL rendered him a tad ineffective? We are close to 30 games this season and I can only wonder when the steam bottled in Babcock will get out in fury…(And frustration). Btw I still am his fan for his indefatigable work ethic..hope it gets rewarded soon…
I celebrate Festivus!!!
by bharatwaj5 on Dec 4, 2010 3:54 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
To be honest
I’m a bit surprised Babs hasn’t benched him for longer stretches. He’s still 26 years old, so he hasn’t lost what’s made him good. That simply doesn’t happen (shut up, Jonathan Cheechoo, and finish making my sandwich).
As far as the CSSI goes, I think I might have made a mistake when I put him in the honorable mentions in the first place. I probably should have clarified that he was closer to getting a minus and the honorable mention was meant to explain why he didn’t. I apologize for the confusion I caused with that.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 4, 2010 4:06 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
How is Huldler better?
He’s not scoring more. He’s not killing it on the PK like Helm, Eaves, Miller. He isn’t winning faceoffs like Helm. He’s not playing physical like the 4th line trio. I’m sorry, but the argument that he’s somehow qualitatively or quantitatively “better” than Helm, Eaves, or Miller holds no water.
Hudler has not played like he did before his stint in the KHL. You say that his upside is comparatively huge. How do we know he hasn’t reach an asymptote and his development stopped when he bolted for the KHL. Following the 2009 playoff run, sure, perhaps his upside was greater. Now? Based on his play this season? I’m not seeing it.
Further, look at Dan Cleary. He was a reclamation project. Now he’s getting big minutes and putting up points because he worked his ass off on the 3rd and 4th lines like Eaves and Miller. I don’t think it’s fair to say that Hudler’s upside is higher than them (Eaves, a former 20 goal scorer, in particular). Give Eaves the linemates and opportunities (e.g. point on the 2nd PP unit) that Hudler has gotten and THEN we can argue who has the greater upside.
As it stands, I’ll take the guys that are on the ice in all situations and contribute on the scoreboard and in the trenches.
by LeftWingLocked on Dec 4, 2010 4:52 PM CST up reply actions
Based on his play this season? I’m not seeing it.
If you want to look at his 20 games this year instead of his 255 prior to that because Russia somehow made him worse, then I can’t argue that he’s a better player than Eaves (who has fewer points in more NHL games played), Miller (a journeyman with fantastic work ethic, but no potential above third-line duties) or Helm (who I think will likely be better than Hudler in the future).
Maybe his development has stopped, but unless he got worse, then his level of play in his last two seasons with Detroit were better than what the three counterparts produced all of last season. We know he can at least do that.
I hate to have to put down Eaves and Miller comparatively when talking about Jiri Hudler, because I personally like both of them more, but if one or the other has to sit, it’s not a big loss to the PK, especially if now they’re sitting in favor of Draper, another guy who fills that role of the penalty-killing grinder who produces points as bonuses and not as expectation. If we want more of those guys, they’re not hard to find. Benching Hudler isn’t going to help him get back to his potential, especially when I can see that he is working out there.
I don’t agree that either Eaves or Miller should be given time on the point on the 2nd PP unit before we can decide who has what upside. We all know what the upside is coming from each of these guys. If Eaves had that upside still, he wouldn’t have been bought out of his contract after being traded to Boston. If Miller had that upside, he would never have been available on Tampa Bay’s waiver wire last season. I did look at Dan Cleary… he leads the team in goals right now, does that mean he’s the team’s best goal-scorer?
Bottom line is that I don’t see Hudler’s struggles right now as a lack of effort. He’s 5’9" tall. His game is never going to be about hitting people and pushing them off pucks in the corners, but rather on making good passes (which he has) and making himself available in quiet areas on the ice for passes (which he has). Also, I’ve really liked what I’ve seen out of him on the point of the 2nd unit these last two games. That entire unit is a lot less stationary since that switch. It’s wrong to credit that entirely to Hudler, but it’s also wrong to say that just because he’s not showing up on the scoreboard, he’s not contributing.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 4, 2010 5:25 PM CST reply actions
Well, agree to disagree.
Yes, I do want to look at this season, because what’s happened in the past is past (ask Ville Leino about that). Hudler’s been an invisible man this season, and it’s perhaps even more disappointing because, as you point out, we’ve seen what he’s capable of. Yet he’s doing none of the things he did in his prior two seasons in the winged wheel. Irrespective of the past, I can’t believe that he can be considered to be having a better season than Helm, Eaves, or Miller.
And that’s the point. Hudler isn’t going to help the team go back in time and beat Pittsburgh in game 7 in 2009. He’s not going to add depth during last season’s injury woes. He’s in the line-up NOW, and he isn’t contributing more than players who are bringing more to the table while taking less off.
I also find it ironic that you imply that I’m wrong in saying that Hudler isn’t contributing if he’s not on the scoreboard (even though I never said that) while simultaneously down-playing Miller/Eaves’ contributions to the PK. Also ironic is that you want to incorporate Hudler’s past contribution while ignoring Eaves past injury woes (which directly led to him being dumped by Boston). That’s a lot of deference to Hudler and very, very little to guys who came to play their guts out in Detroit on the cheap instead of bolting for the KHL for a fat contract, no?
Oh well. Agree to disagree. I guess at the end of the day I’m disappointed. I was very excited for Hudler’s return to the Wings, and in my mind he’s been a tremendous disappointment. Meanwhile, he’s given a mile of rope, while guys who are coming to battle every shift of every night and contributing a ton to the team (not just on the scoreboard) are getting benched in his stead.
by LeftWingLocked on Dec 4, 2010 6:39 PM CST up reply actions
I can’t believe that he can be considered to be having a better season than Helm, Eaves, or Miller.
I owe you an apology if I led you to believe that’s what I meant. I do not at all.
I was very worried about the concept of having to compare Hudler to Eaves and Miller because I do no at all want to minimize what they do bring to the table and have brought to the table this season and last season. I didn’t want to connect saying that Hudler’s been contributing, despite not showing up on the scoreboard with saying that Miller or Eaves haven’t, because even my own CSSI ratings do not support that concept..
Eaves injury history is a good reason for what led him to Detroit and I think Eaves could still really turn into exactly what Cleary has become, but I think Hudler is too valuable an asset based on his potential to call a failed experiment in returning from the KHL. Basically, I’m of the mind that what the fourth line PKing grinders bring is going to be there whenever we need to count on it, but if Hudler can come back to form before the trade deadline while Detroit continues to play like this, then there is no downside to that for me.
It’s a lot of ifs and it’s very hard emotionally to say that Hudler should play over the blue-collar guys working their asses off to keep an NHL job while he ran to Russia for a quick payday last year and left us in a lurch, but from a risk/reward standpoint, I think he should still be given chances to start proving the doubters that the work he’s doing now will become points he’s producing later.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 4, 2010 7:50 PM CST up reply actions
Fair points, all...
I think he should still be given chances to start proving the doubters that the work he’s doing now will become points he’s producing later.
We’re past the quarter pole of the season. How long does he get to prove himself? That’s all I want to know. As short of a leash people like Ericsson (who actually HAS answered the bell this season) are on, I just wonder when Hudler has to answer for his disappearing act.
by LeftWingLocked on Dec 4, 2010 8:01 PM CST up reply actions
Personally, if the Wings keep playing the way they’re playing now, I’d give him probably until the end of next week playing every single game, then put him back into the sitting rotation with slightly preferential treatment (maybe not playing 2 of every 3, but closer to 3 of every 5). If he hasn’t outright earned the honor of playing every night by the time February runs around, then he loses the preferential tag in the sitting rotation and gets even less playing time.
The only way I’d consider trading him would be if we got some insane value (another struggling goal scorer or at worst a 2nd-round pick).
Of course, this all relies on things not changing in the way the Wings are playing and the injury situation. Changes to the situation would bring changes to the way I’d approach it. I’m just glad we have Babcock and Holland making these decisions.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 4, 2010 8:15 PM CST up reply actions
Huds...
Until Modano comes back, the 2nd PP unit actually “needs” Hudler. I too think they’re better, more movement, etc., when he’s in there. Not that we can’t put someone else back there.
Don’t read me wrong, I am very frustrated with Huds…he has the potential, he was in the system before he banished himself to Siberia, so he should be better. I think he’ll be fine, but I’m not sure how much more time he gets to get “there”.
I’m not sure who you put on the 2nd PP unit at the point with the “happy one” in the booth.
Like the guy, but geez Huds, give us something!
Smitty

by 






![Vote Pavs! (courtesy our 'Chop Guru Josh)
Vote here
[edit: DO ITTTTTTT!]](http://cdn3.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/254678/AtlWYeVCAAEewH7_small.jpg)










