Wings Lose The "Cutefest": Sharks 5 - Wings 2
Talk about role-reversal. The Red Wings came back after a successful west coast road trip looking to start another winning streak after an OT loss against the Kings on Saturday night. Unfortunately, the Sharks came in to the Joe looking to continue their win-loss-win-loss thing they've got going on, and they lost their last game. Only one team was going to get their way, and it was not going to be the Wings.
The Wings got off to a great start, and they opened the scoring on the power play when Tomas Holmstrom tipped in a Nicklas Lidstrom shot. It looked like the Wings opened up a 2-0 lead, but the dreaded "quick whistle" reared its ugly head, wiping a would-be Todd Bertuzzi goal off the books. The Wings looked poised to increase their lead anyway, but a horrible sequence of events led to a Joe Thornton shorthanded goal. The Wings got the lead back on a gorgeous passing play, finished off by Johan Franzen. The Wings took a 2-1 lead into the first intermission, and it could easily have been more.
However, despite the Wings' best efforts to end the game at that point, the second period started, and quicker than you can say "we've got this" the Wings were down 3-2. Another odd-man rush late in the second made it 4-2, but we all held out hope that the Wings would come back in the third. However, the Sharks really clamped down (something that has been lacking this year for them), and added a late insurance goal. The Wings never really threatened to come back at any point past the halfway mark of the second period, and when all was said and done, the Sharks left the Joe with a 5-2 victory.
While the start was nice, the ending was ugly. No need to dwell on this too much, but let's get to the bullets after the jump.
Let's just get to it.
- The Wings played one of their best first periods of the season, getting 16 shots on net and controlling play throughout the entire 20 minutes. At one point they were dominating the game so much that the Sharks had to use their time out. The only blemish from that period was the shortie by Thornton, but they immediately followed that with a goal. It was a great display and like I said, the Wings could have been up 3 or 4-1 instead of just having the 1 goal lead.
- However, the Wings decided that the second period was something they weren't interested in participating in, and the two goals in 8 seconds really felt like a death knell for the game. After that, the Wings just seemed to kind of sit back, and the Sharks really took the game over. Once again the Wings had a lot of problems with the Sharks' forechecking, and the Wings really just stopped doing everything they were doing in the first period. The third was boring as all get-out, as the Sharks essentially sat on their two-goal lead while the Wings never really got any sustained offensive pressure. The 5th Sharks goal pretty much sealed the deal.
- Mike Babcock has got to be one of the coaches that interviewers salivate over. His one-on-one with Lindsay Soto in the second period was awesome. After decrying the "cuteness" of the Wings' play in the second period, he then had no problems admitting that the goaltender interference penalty on Tomas Holmstrom was crap. Name another coach that does that in the middle of a national broadcast. Ed Olczyk made a point to mention that Babs has never won the Jack Adams Trophy, and that's because the description for the trophy should read "Coach who took the crappiest team to the biggest improvement from last year".
- Speaking of Edzo, good gravy do I loathe the Versus announcers. I miss Ken and Mickey, but that's just because I'm a peon who needs my homer announcers to tell me whether I like what I'm seeing or not. At one point my daughter turned on a Christmas ornament that plays Jingle Bells over and over again, and that was more welcome than listening to the announcers tonight. But that's a personal thing.
- Hey, Ryan Clowe: how about instead of going after Kronwall for a beautiful hit, you remember that in hockey school, the first thing they teach you is to keep your head up. Don't be such a baby.
- I have been critical of Tomas Holmstrom this year, but there is no one else I'd rather have in front of the net on a power play than him. Ever.
- Jiri Hudler (I just let out a heavy sigh after typing that). I give up. That's all I can say. At one point it looked like he was going to get a 2-on-1 rush, and instead of driving the net, he attempted a cute behind-the-back pass that was intercepted. Jiri, if you have only scored one goal all year, and it was because of a freak bounce, you have no business attempting cute little plays like that. Take the puck to the net and get a shot off.
- The question must be asked: how huge was that waved-off goal? If that counts, the Wings are up 2-0, they have all the momentum in the world, and it's an entirely different game. From what I can tell, this was not one of those "intent to blow" situations that we're so used to. However, even at full speed, it seemed pretty clear that Niemi never had the puck. It's a shame that it didn't count, and I'm not going to say that it cost them a win. But the entire complexion of the game is different if that goal counts. Food for thought.
No one on the Wings was particularly good tonight. We'll get the poll up for PotG, but the pickings are slim. San Jose came in looking to "avenge" last week's loss, and they did that, I guess. Much like the Wings getting some sort of "revenge" for last year's playoff loss, I think things like that are used by the team and fans to get excited for a game in mid-December. It was a well-played game by the Sharks, particularly Antti Niemi, who kept them in the game in the first period. The Wings will need a much better effort going forward as they face a schedule that includes a lot of games in a short amount of time.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That "cute" Hudler behind-the-back pass
I’m really glad you mentioned it, because I literally did this:

It may be my breaking point for Hudler as well. He needs to show signs of improvement, and right now I see nothing.
Is it too late to change my vote or the poll?
I don’t think it matters because nobody picked him pregame (probably), but I just finished my CSSI post and I think Brad Stuart is deserving of a vote.
He officially ended up a minus-1 on the night, but I’ve got him at an even rating thanks in large part to that save he made in the first period. He didn’t play great, but in a night full of sucking, he sucked less than the other sucks who sucked it up out there.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 6, 2010 11:04 PM CST reply actions
Looks like I picked a good game to miss
Of course, I’d rather watch bad hockey than do this stupid project.
Player of the game: Tomas Holmstrom
He scored his first goal in a while and got a really nice assist on Franzen’s goal, for the only offense of the game by the Red Wings.
Wasn’t it Hudler who stepped up, resulting in the shorthanded 2-on-1 and goal against?
What is it about bad calls? It’s a given that there will occasionally be bad calls, but the Red Wings often seem like they give up after a call goes against them. The no-goal was bad (all the more so because Niemi never made the save), but not that bad (it was a terrible goal and cf. May’s no-goal from last season). The result: the Sharks woke up, trapped the Red Wings in their zone, drew a penalty, and scored a shorthanded goal shortly thereafter. I was hoping Franzen’s goal indicated that the Red Wings weren’t done playing yet, but…
What makes the shorthanded goal even worse is that it was scored on the penalty resulting from an elbow to Zetterberg’s head. Early on, the Sharks were not playing their game and kept doing stupid things, so the game should have been an easy win and it might have been if not for that shorty.
I can’t yell too much about the no-goal, but the officiating was not great. When the Red Wings were penned in their zone after the no-goal, a Sharks player fell on Howard when no one was near him and the Sharks nearly scored: no call. A Sharks player pushed Holmstrom into Niemi: goaltender interference.
Delayed penalty against Couture for retaliation against Kronwall and after the play it looked like another Sharks player elbowed Kronwall, but only one penalty was called.
Even after two reviews seemingly went against the Red Wings, I still hold that the NHL video reviewers are right more often than not: it seemed like someone wanted to talk to the referee after he blew the no-goal call (but they couldn’t do anything about it) and I’m sure it wasn’t to congratulate him, and the kick was clearly a good legal goal.
Never really considered Homer
It was Hudler that stepped up, as he was the point man. However, Zetterberg also failed to corral the pass that came along the boards in the first place. It was really a group brain-fart there.
Regardless of whether that goal counted or not, the Sharks would have called timeout and settled down. As Ms B pointed out below, the Wings could have been up 3 or 4 goals, and if they play the 2nd period the same way, they still might lose. It was their inability to sustain any offensive pressure and their overall lack of skating in the second that led to this loss, not the no-goal call.
I completely agree on the penalty calls. The Sharks were running around and taking some really dumb penalties in the first period, and while the Wings were able to get 2 PPG, the fact they gave up a shortie really hurt and killed any momentum they had from the goals. The officiating was mediocre, with only the Homer interference penalty being a “WTF” call from me.
No one to blame for the Wings’ loss except the players. They were outworked in the second period and just didn’t do much of anything in the third. Need a much better effort against the Preds on Wednesday.
That photo caption makes little sense
A) How could we play you guys in the finals?
and B) We beat you in the playoffs.
But seriously, that was a good game (for us) and I look forward to the next one to see who takes the season series lead, both games have been lopsided so I wonder which Sharks and Red Wings we see next time out. It’s always fun playing you guys and it’s always great to win at the Joe as our record there is really shitty.
It was more about how they showed up and played a good game, yet neither one of them seems to be able to do it when it actually matters, like in late May or early June. I was very bitter when I came up with it.
The Sharks really imposed their style of play on the Wings from the second period on, the Wings could not handle the forecheck, and the return of Demers and Wallin really solidified the defense for you guys, preventing the Wings from doing whatever they wanted in the Sharks’ zone. And Niemi played really well in the first period when things could have gotten out of hand.
Looking forward to the next game. These lopsided scores are not indicative of how close these teams are in terms of talent. I’ve expected two tight, close games and haven’t seen it yet.
I think the disallowed goal doesn't cost them the game
At least you can’t make that drastic of an extrapolation. I think it did cost a more competitive game overall. San Jose was still a more rested team, and needed to win more than Detroit did (just based on the standings), so it wasn’t as though they would have given up after being down 2-0.
I think the flow might have been different. Still with the second period on the Wings’ part that flat, they could have had a four-goal lead and still blown the game.
#sigh
The fifth regulation loss of the season had to happen sometime, and it so happened to be this day.
Random Ramblings from a Somewhat Scattered Mind
"It is a mistake to try to look too far ahead. The chain of destiny can only be grasped one link at a time." --Sir Winston Churchill (1874 – 1965)
You're right
I think what cost the game was the Wings letting up and the Sharks waking up, which were helped by the disallowed goal. Even the shorthanded goal wasn’t the decider, but those do have a tendency to make one team play much better and the other seem much worse.
OT: I seem to recall someone saying that it is much easier to lose by a large margin than a close game because in the former case the players can always say “we just didn’t play well”, forget it and play better the next game. But as fans, we want our teams to play their best every game, win or lose.
Hudler's got to go
Good grief. Unload him and bring up Val’s brother. Hudler is not the prodigal son he thinks he is. The Wings could acquire any role player with some drive to outperform this prima donna.
And where should we unload him to?
This isn’t as simple as selecting Hudler on one side, Ovechkin on the other, pressing A and then overriding the trade when EA Sports rejects it.
Someone else has to find him valuable at his pricetag. And with a 3mil cap hit, that’s not likely.
Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen
Hudler on the short-hander
Okay Z might have missed the pass. But Hudler not only pinched in getting caught, but also he doesn’t have the speed to make up for that mistake and catch up to the play. I think Ericsson, and certainly Modano, would have caught up with Heatley and Thornton and at least made them less comfortable if not broken up the pass.
To play devil's advocate
Hudler is pretty weak defensively, so even if he did make the right play, it probably wouldn’t have mattered.
Really, I think Hudler needs to find his confidence again and he’ll become more of an asset and less of a defensive liability. He’s getting plenty of chances but either not shooting or taking a second too long to make the good play. Let’s hope he gets his confidence soon and doesn’t continue being this season’s Leino.

by 


















