Lessons Learned: Defense
Continuing the season review, we'll take a look at the defense today. Like with the goaltending, we'll look back at the season preview and see if we're geniuses or morons.
Season preview--strengths:
Defense: Chris Chelios is no longer on the team and Andreas Lilja will start the year on the long term injured reserve. But if it wasn't for these two circumstances Jonathan Ericsson wouldn't have gotten the chance to start the season with the Red Wings. Ericsson is an up and coming defenseman who shows too much skill and mental awareness to have just had "fluke success" in his time last year. His big frame is a much needed presence in the defensive end and he should work well with the speedy and energetic puck chaser Brett Lebda. Lidstrom and Rafalski are one of the best pairings in the league and Kronwall and Stuart have a perfect chemistry since both are skilled but physical defensemen. The key to the success of the 09-10 team lies in the defense. If they keep the pressure off of Osgood and feed the playmakers, the Red Wings can continue to play their trademark puck possession hockey.
"Ericsson...shows too much skill and mental awareness to have just had 'fluke success' " well...the -15 and numerous turnovers and bad play made me look stupid huh? Big E had a lot of trouble adjusting to his first full season in the league but by the end of the season he was having a lot better go of it and making a lot fewer mistakes. I chalk that up to playing alongside Andreas Lilja. "The key to the success of the 09-0 team lies in the defense" or this year, lack of defense was the cause of a lot of late game collapses that could have had the Red Wings at a higher seed or further in the playoffs (see: games 1-3 San Jose).
More after the jump...
All of this isn't to say that the Red Wings didn't have any success on defense but rather just not the success we are used to from the blueliners. Inconsistency plagued the team and kept them from having offensive success too. However, given some of the injuries this year we got to see some of the future guys that might make an appearance in Detroit next year. When Kronwall went down with a knee injury and Lilja still missing from a concussion, Jakub Kindl got to play in three games and show his ability. I think Kindl and possibly even Sergei Kolosov will fill the shoes of any of the following: Lilja, Lebda, Meech, Lidstrom (just his roster spot, no one ever replaces that guy).
Following his year long absence from post-concussion symptoms, Andreas Lilja played pretty well in the time given to him. He was a solid penalty killer and shot blocker while appearing to have improved some on his mental and positioning game. I think he's earned himself another year in Detroit while Lebda and/or Meech walk.
Season preview--weaknesses
Defense: Last year's defense was pretty horrid at times and it showed in two 8 goal games and several 6 goal games. There was very uncharacteristically poor play by Lidstrom, Rafalski, Kronwall, and Stuart far too often for my taste. Pinching in the offensive zone at the wrong time created breakaways, confusion with assignments created shooting lanes, and sometimes just flat out bad defensive play were common during games last year. With the loss of the a lot of the offense from last year, there has to be a new focus on defense. Ericsson showed his knowledge of the game and skill; hopefully this translates to a cohesive third pairing and the top two lines are more likely than not to return to their former level of play.
"Last year's defense was pretty horrid at times" that carried over to this year it seems. "There was uncharacteristically poor play by Lidstrom, Rafalski, Kronwall, and Stuart far too often..." That carried over a bit too this year, all four are guilty--but consider that's also by the standards that have been established based on their excellent performance in the past. "Pinching in the offensive zone at the wrong time created breakaways" That continued this year but to a lot lower rate (thankfully) than the previous year. "Confusion with assignments created shooting lanes" Remember the LA game allowing 52 shots on net? Yep.
There was a lot of carry over from the previous season that seemed to plague this year's team as well. I can't fully blame just the defensive players by position definition either as a lot of the forwards this year were rotating in and out from injuries and only a few of them played consistently well in their own end. The defensive pairings were as expected this year with Lidstrom/Rafalski getting the most minutes per night and Kronwall/Stuart playing a load of minutes as well. Perhaps one of the biggest things I noticed this season was how often Kronwall and Stuart played some major minutes. I think this is a sign of how things are progressing on the blue line. There's no longer a pairing 1 and pairing 2, it's pairing 1a and 1b. That's something that they can look at with a bit of a silver lining as Lidstrom debates retirement, there's more than one guy fully capable of stepping up to the top pair.
In the end, there was a lot that plagued this season's team defensively. The downturn in scoring at the other end created greater pressure for the defense to bend and not break. Unfortunately, it broke a few too many times this season and a lot of the opposing teams were able to exploit that weakness. But there was plenty of good too with the way that Lilja returned from injury and the big contributions put forth by Stuart and Kronwall.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
Pleased given the circumstances
It’s hard, very hard, to have a consistently good defensive group when half of the team’s starters are out due to injury and there’s a rookie in net. I loved the D sometimes, and facepalmed it at others… but it was such a weird year. Raffy and Stuart really need to cut down the stupid turnovers. Turnovers happen, but stupid turnovers almost always lead directly to goals against. Hopefully Ericsson’s strong play in the post-season will give him the confidence he needs to be as successful as his talent can carry him.
I’m not really a fan of Lilja, Lebda or Meech. I’d rather have Meech as a forward than a defenseman, but more realistically I’d rather have Kindl in the NHL. If Kindl and Ericsson pan out, they will be part of the core of this team for a long time, we need them in the lineup and gaining the experience.
Not pleased
I thought Lidstrom and Stuart were our best defensemen on the ice all season, bar none, and that Stuart’s mini-meltdown in January was just overuse (he was averaging the most ice time on the team for a while there).
With Rafalski, you get whatever he’s giving, and often it’s turnover prone, full of mistakes hockey, while othertimes it’s sheer brilliance. His inconsistency is maddening.
Kronwall gets a pass this year, because he wasn’t healthy at all since the Laraque cheap shot, and man did it show.
But my main beef with this year’s defense was the fact that our two “big bodies” on the blue line, specifically Jonathan Ericsson, did nothing to use their size to their advantage, and often were caught deep deep deep in the defensive zone for long periods of time.
Ericsson specifically demonstrated little to no upside. The cannon of a shot was absent all year. The simple plays instead became convoluted, exceedingly difficult plays, often resulting in turnovers. He didn’t hit, he didn’t utilize his stick, and his -15 rating was 100% deserved for his abysmal play. If we get another season of that, I think it’s time to pull the plug on this experiment and consider it over.
What I would be open to is keeping Ole-Kristian Tollefsson. Big, physical defenseman. Big crease-clearer. Shot blocker. He barely played last season, thanks to a knee injury, but I figure, give him a two year deal, and see what we get out of him.
by eight_legged_freaks on May 14, 2010 4:04 PM CDT reply actions
wow
I 100% agree with all of that. Haha, couldn’t have said it better myself.
Totally agree on Lids and Stu, and about Stuart’s fatigue midway through the season. Stuart I think dropped his play off a bit in the playoffs though, except for the goals he potted.
If Ericsson doesn’t improve, I totally agree to drop his a$$. He seemed to learn from Lilja on how to (mis)use his size…kind of frustrating. Tollefsson would be a great replacement if Ericsson bombs.
by plopperrawr on May 14, 2010 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't think
they’re bringing Tollefsson back. I think he was signed more or less as injury insurance, and I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that they’re not bringing him back.
No Limits.
Needs improvement
But I was largely pleased with the defensive effort. Despite the failings mentioned, it was the defensive play that kept them in many games, while the offense let them down—a complete turnaround from the season season prior.
Unfortunately, they did tend to allow too many shots against (1.7 shots/game and 2.1 saves/game increases), but a lot of that is the result of not having Hossa and Hudler, and Franzen and Filppula for significant time.


























