Spicy Buffalo/Wings Recap
The Detroit Red Wings have not lost three consecutive games this year.
Tonight, they tested that pretty severely as they went into Buffalo after losing back-to-back games and gave up two goals in the first period, forcing themselves to once again play catch-up hockey. Thankfully, they were able to buckle down defensively and turn it on before time ran out, tying the game with 58 seconds left on a fantastic shot from Jiri Hudler.
Andrej Sekera opened the scoring 13 minutes into the game, as he took advantage of an overzealous Wings forecheck and roofed a backhand over Joey MacDonald as the Sabres came in on an odd-man rush. Just over two minutes later, the Sabres converted again as Sekera took advantage of a bad step by Brad Stuart and a rare miss by Nick Lidstrom on a cross-ice pass to Mike Grier. Grier gets it with just enough room to deke MacDonald and slide the puck in behind him. An undoubtedly interesting locker room during the first intermission provoked the Wings into playing better hockey going forward. Pavel Datsyuk started the comeback for Detroit at 10:43 by picking up his own blocked shot and firing it through the screen in front of Ryan Miller. After another 28 minutes of Detroit trying to solve the Buffalo defensive shell, Detroit was able to force overtime as Jiri Hudler comes off the bench for Joey MacDonald and slammed home a rebounded shot from Johan Franzen. The Wings and Sabres played one of the most exciting overtime periods I've seen all season, but at the end of five minutes, the game had still yet to be decided.
Before tonight, two things had been at 100% in the shootout: The Buffalo Sabres and Thomas Vanek. Joey MacDonald, Pavel Datsyuk, and Jiri Hudler combined to change that. Joey Mac stopped Drew Stafford to start the skills competition, followed by a Datsyukian backhander over Ryan Miller. Vanek went next for Buffalo, sporting a fancy 5-for-5 success ratio when MacDonald shut him down on a glove-side shot to put the game on Jiri Hudler's stick. Hudler, in what's starting to become a habit for the diminutive nutjob, failed to disappoint as he copied Datsyuk's move, but added the extra panache of going off the crossbar and then off Miller's ass for the game-clincher. Needless to say, Hudler wins this game of H-O-R-S-E.
Follow through the jump for the bullet points.
- Modano and Filppula combined for over 30 minutes of ice time (Flip - 16:37, Mo - 13:46), a +1 rating (Filppula's), and 5 shots on net (three guesses as to which one of these two had more... If you get to guess #3, stop drinking absinthe) Overall, I liked the jump they provided. The timing wasn't quite there, but that will come back with, well, time.
- A minor boo to Mike Babcock for not playing Drew Miller against his older-but-much-younger-looking brother Ryan. Did we really need Abdelkader for this one (or maybe Draper)?
- I said this in the game thread, but it bears repeating. Just once I'd like to hear Larry Murphy refer to it as a "Me dump."
- I understand that Ryan Miller has been under some fire lately for not performing up to the lofty expectations people have come to put on him and possibly being a hindrance to Buffalo's future chances with his relatively large cap hit, especially considering the Detroit-based movement to put a very solid defense in front of lower-paid goaltending to get more bang for your buck. Well, I can tell you after this game that he was worth every penny. Miller didn't get the win, but he made a handful of absolutely marvelous saves. He ultimately couldn't pull off the win for his team, but he's the reason they got a point tonight.
- On the other end, I thought Joey MacDonald played well after giving up the first goal in a somewhat soft fashion. He wasn't tested as much as Miller, but there were certainly opportunities for Buffalo to put the game away late and he was able to shut the door. Swallowing up the rebound on a slapshot from Chris Butler while Rob Niedermayer was sniffing around the crease for a loose puck. Also, big credit to MacDonald for keeping Tyler Myers off the scoresheet, earning the children another $20 in the H2H2 Pledge Drive.
- Defensively, the Red Wings' corps broke into two factions tonight: Niklas Kronwall, and everybody who didn't suck. Kronwall registered more hits on Red Wings players than he did on Buffalo players. I especially liked how confident Jakub Kindl looked in his first game back in the lineup. I know I'm not supposed to notice defensemen more for what they do below the other team's faceoff dots, but I thought he took his chances very well. Oh yeah, he played well in his own zone too. Also, I was pleasantly surprised to see Jonathan Ericsson play a defensively sound game. He's still got a ways to go before he can shed the well-earned title of Riggy Shitbox, but we've got to take baby steps here.
- If Lindy Ruff and Mike Babcock ever had an angry scowl-off, the world might end. Babcock would win hands down, but we'd all be losers, as we tried to piece back together the world as we know it.
- Only three penalties were called in this game, as referees Mike Leggo (my Eggo) and Don VanMassenhoven (gesundheit) chose to "let them play". Ultimately, I thought the game was well-reffed and well-paced. Sure, the Brad Stuart call wasn't great, but it was really easy to see why it would have been made.
- No vote needed here, Jiri Hudler is your Red Wings Player of the Game.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Photo caption
It took a second for it to load before I saw it and it’s extremely G rated compared to what I was preparing myself for.
Haha
To be honest, it took me a minute to think up a caption that G-rated.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 26, 2011 10:08 PM CST up reply actions
I should get bonus points for predicting
not only the exact score but that it was going into OT :)…gotta go check out the highlights…sounds like a nice come from behinjd win
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
Does Hudler get a goal credit for the SO winning shot?
Because I called him for player of the game, meaning I had $5 per goal on the line for H2H2 (4th straight game the guy I picked for 5/goal duties has scored!).
And I’m pretty sure I called 3-2 Detroit on here, as well as offering up $13 for that exact score. Good night for the kids. And eventually, us, although I had to bail on the game when it was 2-0 Sabres, and I didn’t think it’d turn around.
Can the Red Wings make it 5 in 15 years? Here's hoping!
No official goal credit
Technically, he’s not even credited with the SO-winning shot, as that was Datsyuk (although Hudler’s shot clinched the shootout).
However, if you wanted to give $5 for that goal, I’m sure nobody would mind.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 26, 2011 11:35 PM CST up reply actions
Also
You did indeed pick a 3-2 Wings win with Hudler as PotG – congrats on hitting the bonus!
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 26, 2011 11:36 PM CST up reply actions
major booo to babcock
his whole family was there and he deserved to be in the line up over draper….DUMB move
not
It’s not family time. It’s lets-win-a-hockey-game time, and who is in the audience shouldn’t dictate Babcock’s lineup choices. Very Bowman-esqe. I approve.
You don’t think Miller would have played a more inspired game in front of his family and against his brother?
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 8:10 AM CST up reply actions
please refrain from mentioning Mr Bowman & ***cock in the same breath
You know how fired up Drew he would have been to be out on that ice. he would have had more jump than anyone and alot more jump than draper who already has one foot out the door.
worst/best player of the game
I was screaming at my laptop watching hudler force offside after offside in the 3rd, then he comes off the bench to score the tying goal. I guess holding anyone else up to Datsyuk off-the-puck-decision-making standards is not entirely fair, but huds frequently makes me wonder what the hell he’s thinking out there.
Kronwall doesn’t deserve the hate he’s getting from the above analysis – He’s in a tough spot after playing a bunch of games on the right side and now moving back but with Big-E tonight. He just needs to have his d-pairing solidified so he can get back in the groove. He almost took the game over in one shift tonight trying to generate offense.
Also too many people are quick to calls some goals against "weak".
That first goal was far from being weak or soft. That was a great shot on a 2 on 1. It would take an awful attempt to make me blame a goalie on a 2 on 1. The defense gave up way too many 2 on 1’s again and those are the reasons the Wings are having GAA issues. NOT goaltending. Joey Mac has played solid all year for the Wings. The only goal against that I can remember being soft was the first goal of the Florida game, but those happen and it also was a defensive lapse. Look no further than the shootout stats for the Wing’s goalies this year. Joey Mac has 5 saves in 6 attempts, and Howard is 13 for 14. Unfortunately those translated into losses because the shooter for Detroit didn’t score any.
So please people, stop railing on the goaltending. We could have Ryan Miller or any “top notch” goaltender in there and we are going to get the same results. We’ve had Hasek, Joseph, Vernon, and many others… no goalie is going to dominate as a Red Wing. The Red Wing’s style is death to goalies. The goalie doesn’t see many shots usually, but the Wings always give up glorious scoring chances and odd man rushes.
Also, Hudler has been playing great lately so a few offsides don’t hurt. If you want to get on someone for offsides, try yelling at Kris Draper. He’s been an offsides fiend his entire career.
two-on-one
d-man takes the pass, goalie takes the shooter. Joey MacDonald was not square to the shooter, he was cheating to the pass and gave up more room than he should have on the short side. It might not have been completely soft, but there was a measurable mistake in positioning by the goaltender on that shot.
MacDonald played well last night after giving up that first goal that I would have liked to have seen him stop. I thought he calmed down well and did an excellent job on rebound control.
Overall though, I agree with your analysis – the reason the Red Wings give up too many goals continues to be the fault of the guys playing in front of the netminder. The only goaltending change I want in Detroit right now is for Chris Osgood to get healthy.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 8:03 AM CST up reply actions
On Kronner
I understand the adjustment period, but when it all comes down to it, I expect a $3.5M (by pay, not by cap hit) defenseman to make it quicker.
He walked a very fine line between being in the running for PotG and being picked on and in the end, I felt like he deserved the second one. He almost took the game over in one shift, but didn’t. Instead, what he did was run into two of his own players, miss the net four times, and have another four shots blocked. Couple that with a handful of bad clearing attempts, the offense he almost helped create for the Wings didn’t cancel out the total of the offense he almost helped create for the Sabres.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 8:08 AM CST up reply actions
I just finished it up on DVR and woo-hoo! I thought Kindl played excellent tonight and he looked really confident. I thought Franzen looked pretty good tonight too and he looked like he was playing hard all night.
oh and hell yes, Hokies.
Winging It In Motown and now covering Hokie baseball at Gobbler Country
On The Twitter at @MrNorrisTrophy
great win yesterday Casey
Va Tech might of just locked up their tourney bid
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
by TuLoRocks2008 on Feb 27, 2011 11:03 AM CST up reply actions
nothing like seeing Dook
get beaten bwhahaha
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
by TuLoRocks2008 on Feb 27, 2011 11:03 AM CST up reply actions
No vote needed?
Really?
Let me get this straight.
Hudler turns the puck over, forces play offsides like the bastard love child of Robert Lang and Mikael Samuelsson, and only puts in 13 minutes of ice time (limited only to even strength or man advantage) for the first 50 minutes, then cleans up the garbage to send it to OT because Miller kicked out a rare rebound and Buffalo failed to pick up the extra man coming off the bench, and manages to sneak one past Miller in the shootout.
Meanwhile, Pavel puts in a full 65 minute game, dangles with multiple Buffalo defenders on him, wins some key faceoffs, puts in nearly twenty minutes TOI, breaks the shutout to give the team serious momentum in the second (that was carried through the remainder of the game), picks apart the Buffalo trap in the third, creates chances every time he’s in the offensive zone (tying Lidstrom for shot lead in the game), commits grand larceny every time Buffalo tries to carry the puck up ice when he’s on the forecheck, AND sprinkles in a few hits here and there for good measure.
And there’s no question as to who the POTG is?
Ooooooookay. I’m going to have to put my Happy tinted monocle on to watch the next game…
by LeftWingLocked on Feb 27, 2011 10:02 AM CST reply actions
six fewer minutes of ice time and Hudler had just as many points as Datsyuk.
They also had the same number of turnovers.
Also, all of Datsyuk’s ice time was limited to even strength or man advantage, so I’m not sure where that came from.
Perhaps if Valtteri Filppula weren’t in love with dangling at the blue line, Jiri Hudler trying to enter the zone with speed wouldn’t be a problem.
Oooooooooooookay?
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 11:28 AM CST up reply actions
Perhaps if Valtteri Filppula weren’t in love with dangling at the blue line, Jiri Hudler trying to enter the zone with speed wouldn’t be a problem.
This.
More often than not, offsides is the fault of the puck carrier, not the off guy. Either he needs to hit the off guy with speed sooner, so he can carry into the zone, or dump it in onsides so that his offwing can get use his speed to get behind the D and pick up the puck.
When the puck carrier gets fancy at the blue line, that’s when offisides happen.
Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen
Thanks!
First, thank you for making the point that there actually IS a question as to who player of the game was. So by your generous metrics (19 minutes to 13 minutes TOI is close? Yeah. That’s nice.), they have very similar numbers for the game. So why was Hudler the obvious and only choice if they were arguably close?
Second
Perhaps if Valtteri Filppula weren’t in love with dangling at the blue line, Jiri Hudler trying to enter the zone with speed wouldn’t be a problem.
Yes, and perhaps if Datsyuk didn’t get hurt he’d be a 100 point scorer. Perhaps if it were a playoff game, Franzen would’ve scored 6 goals. Perhaps if Darren Helm played with Zetterberg he’d have 40 goals on the year. Perhaps MacDonald would’ve notched a shutout if Kronwall didn’t enjoy giving up odd man rushes so much. Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps. I didn’t realize hypotheticals carried more weight than facts and reality. I will recalibrate accordingly.
Third. I must apologize. I didn’t realize I was on the Detroit Free Press site. I thought there was some objectivity. I guess I should’ve known better when I read the continued disparaging of "Riggy Shitbox," who, despite being one of the more consistent blueliners for Detroit this season (particularly from a defensive standpoint), will never shake the loathing you and others like to hurl at him for poor play last season. Meanwhile, Kronwall’s contributions to the opposition’s odd-man rush stats continue to get a pass because? And Hudler, who has not been the player he was before jumping ship for the KHL continues to get a pass because?
Great on them for bringing the cup to Detroit in 08 and the finals in 09. The nostalgia is lovely. If you want to let them rest on their laurels, then by all means. If you want your man crush on Happy to color your perspective, fine. But don’t insult intelligent hockey observers by arrogantly deeming Hudler was the only choice for player of the game.
Oooooookay?
by LeftWingLocked on Feb 27, 2011 12:13 PM CST up reply actions
first
Datsyuk getting hurt, the game being a playoff game vs. a regular season game for Franzen, Helm’s role in the lineup, and MacDonald’s shutout hinging on Kronwall’s play aren’t as much in the players’ control as Filppula’s tendency to drag his linemates offsides because Filppula doesn’t see it as his priority to get into the zone. what else should Hudler do? acquiesce to Filppula’s puckhandling so the Red Wings gain the blueline only to get a weak shot on goal because they can’t back off the opposing defense?
second: i would hardly call “Riggy Shitbox” one of the more consistent blueliners for Detroit this season because pretty much only Lidstrom and Stuart earn the title of “consistent blueliner.” Ericsson’s play over a stretch of the season earlier was shaking off the nightmare of a season he had last year, but his gradual regression back to 09-10 Ericsson is giving us as fans fits. and i dont know if you’ve been reading the comments here, but we’ve been railing on Kronwall for quite a while now. as for Hudler, ever since he and Datsyuk and Cleary formed a line (and even a bit before that, but i could be wrong since i dont exactly remember), which has been dominating opponents, Hudler’s gotten away from his first half “shitbox” and started to be a more consistent player. PotG worthy last night? i dont know; i’m not that great an observer to be able to distinguish something like that over the small sample size of a game unless it’s really obvious, plus, i saw only the overtime last night.
by uvgt2bkdnme on Feb 27, 2011 12:43 PM CST up reply actions
Hahaha
relax man, act like a dick and get treated like one.
So you missed your PotG prediction; it’ll be ok.
The facts about going offsides is that it’s just as much (if not more) on the puck carrier than it is on the guy who goes offsides. Or did you miss that point.
When did I say that minutes played were close? I said they scored an equal amount of points during their time on ice (which neither of them has any control over). Jiri Hudler scored just as many points in less ice time, looking at that backwards means that Jiri’s points-per-minute rating was higher for this game.
Find me one person who believes that Ericsson has been better than Kronwall this season. That is an absolutely ridiculously untenable position to take. Ericsson has not been one of the more consistent blueliners for Detroit and there are absolutely no metrics which support anything resembling a claim that he’s more valuable than Kronwall.
Of course, it’s interesting you bring up Kronwall “getting a pass” in this particular comments section, considering previously I had to defend my stance that he had a bad game last night (and by my thoughts in both the recap and the CSSI was outplayed by Ericsson in this one particular game).
How far back do you want to keep looking at Hudler? His adjustment period was longer than it should have been – we can continue to beat our breasts over that or you and your angry little ilk can stop and realize that, aside from Datsyuk and Zetterberg, Hudler has been the team’s best performer over the last ten games. In fact, he’s been better than the player he was before jumping ship to the KHL.
It’s one player of the game decision, man, and you want to drop bombs over this? Sometimes it’s not going to be up for a vote. Sometimes when we do put it up for a vote, people vote non-objectively.
Ooooooooookay.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 12:47 PM CST up reply actions
So, still not going to address the question, eh?
That Hudler was the hands down player of the game? Fair enough.
So what have we learned? Disagreeing with the WIIM braintrust means you’re being dick. That objectivity is irrelevant. That official metrics like Ericssons +/- are discounted in favor of what, exactly? The CSSI that is put together by someone who likes calling him Riggy Shitbox, indicating an obvious bias against the player? That there is one and only one correct way to look at any subject when it comes to Detroit Red Wings hockey (and that way is the WIIM writers way, dammit!).
There’s a fine line between objective and interesting debate and a circle jerk. Enjoy your crackers, boys.
(And yes, you’ll have the last word. Arguing…internets…special olympics…)
by LeftWingLocked on Feb 27, 2011 1:07 PM CST up reply actions
+/- is a false stat to begin with. A guy who steps on the ice just before the puck goes in gets a +/- just because he happened to be on the ice. It doesn’t mean he actually did anything to contribute for or against a goal.
Looking at the way a player has actually played is the way to determine how he has played. And Ericsson has shown improvement this season, but he’s also shown some giant mental lapses. He’s getting better, but he’s not quite the all-star defenseman everyone seems to be expecting out of him. And despite being 6-5, he plays more like he’s 5-6. That’s the biggest knock on him.
But you’re welcome to disagree. Politely.
And there IS more than one way to look at Red Wings hockey. Start your own blog and you can look at it any way you want.
Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen
Ah.
I see the wagons have been circled.

by LeftWingLocked on Feb 27, 2011 1:45 PM CST up reply actions
This post is a mirror
I suggest looking into it.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 1:47 PM CST up reply actions
I can google for pictures too

Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen
No
The lesson learned here is that sarcastically attacking people makes you a dick. You’re not a fucking victim here, you’re a dick.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 1:16 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
“no vote needed?
Really?
Let me get this straight."
could have more properly been framed:
“i dont understand how Hudler’s an ‘obvious’ choice for PotG especially in light of factors X, Y, and Z that are in favor of Datsyuk for last night’s game over Hudler.”
you get an answer, maybe one of you is convinced of the other side’s point of view (or you both continue to disagree), and you move on. your original word choice and presentation of your argument put people off. it had nothing to do with other people’s objectivity or subjectivity.
by uvgt2bkdnme on Feb 27, 2011 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Show me metrics. Show me something ANYTHING that supports the claim that Ericsson is more valuable than Kronwall other than your own bias that says Big E has been “solid” while Kronwall has been nothing more than a mistake machine.
The question is that there’s a debate to be had about whether Hudler deserved player of the game. There was a very good way to frame that debate, and then there’s what you did. You’ve shown no more objectivity than you’re expecting of me in the way you’ve brought your opinion to this. Go re-read your first comment framing how you think Hudler had a terrible game and tell me that was objectively written.
Aside from being dickish, it’s incredibly hypocritical of you.
If my bias against Ericsson is such a huge problem in the way my CSSI ratings are taken, then I welcome you to go back and look at every single Red Wings game this season and start your own means of adjusting the statistics for context. Perhaps we could find a way to work together to create a slightly more objective system. If nothing else, perhaps it would give you your own set of metrics to try to explain the untenable platform that a #6 defenseman with less than half the points, who also plays four fewer minutes per game and is counted on for less than half of the penalty-killing time is somehow more valuable than the 2nd-pairing guy who also gets called out for being mistake-prone.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 1:29 PM CST up reply actions
Indeed.
There was a very good way to frame that debate, and then there’s what you did. You’ve shown no more objectivity than you’re expecting of me in the way you’ve brought your opinion to this.
The difference is I’m just anonymous Red Wings fanboy. Your name is on the front page of the site. If you can’t see the distinction there, there really is no point in continuing the discussion.
by LeftWingLocked on Feb 27, 2011 1:38 PM CST up reply actions
I think you're mistaken on the definition of what a blog is
It is more akin to the Op/Ed pages of a newspaper than the news section.
Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen
I thought there was no point in continuing the discussion when you said this:
(And yes, you’ll have the last word. Arguing…internets…special olympics…)
So is there a point to continuing the discussion or isn’t here?
What does my name being on the blog have anything to do with the expected level of objectivity? Where on this blog have I ever said that I strove for the objectivity you’re expecting from me, but not from yourself?
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 1:44 PM CST up reply actions
Show me something ANYTHING that supports the claim that Ericsson is more valuable than Kronwall other than your own bias that says Big E has been "solid" while Kronwall has been nothing more than a mistake machine.
And you show me where I said that Ericsson was more valuable than anyone on the team.
But you build your strawmen so you can prove how right you are.
by LeftWingLocked on Feb 27, 2011 1:43 PM CST up reply actions
This is a fantastic time to bring this up
I’m sorry, I misunderstood while you were busy accusing me of giving Kronwall “a pass” in the comments section of a post where I called him the worst defenseman on the team for the game in question.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 1:46 PM CST up reply actions
I would say you're wrong...
but then I’d be a dick for disagreeing. I think. I don’t really follow the logic, I just know it’s true.
by Brion on Feb 27, 2011 2:26 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Please sir
Don’t ever let me write recaps. I’m not objective enough for the tyrannical.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 27, 2011 2:29 PM CST up reply actions
Don't worry.
They saved you a cracker. Enjoy!
by LeftWingLocked on Feb 27, 2011 2:29 PM CST up reply actions
I don't get it
I’m also still fairly hungover, so that may be part of the problem. Was that a joke about my name?
Awesome win :) - i saw the hilights and the canadian airwaves were echoing "Hud" Ler
I doubt my POTG game/score counted b/c i didn’t enter the form; but at the end of the Stars game I wrote 3-2 wings in the recap! :-D
(preemptively picking the game b/c i was in Toronto HHOF all of saturday)!
Also the HHOF was mostly Pens fans!!! soo many damn crosby jerseys!
"A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day." ~ Calvin (C & H)
since everyone is talking about POTG
i would like to mention shithead of the game brad stuart dropped the ball tonight and was nice enough to leave video footage of how not to play the body and make yourself look like an ass and cost you’re team
congratualations brad better to win this award now than in april may or june

by 





![Vote Pavs! (courtesy our 'Chop Guru Josh)
Vote here
[edit: DO ITTTTTTT!]](http://cdn3.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/254678/AtlWYeVCAAEewH7_small.jpg)












