Streak Busted--Predators 3 Red Wings 1
The Red Wings were without Johan Franzen, Jiri Hudler, Pavel Datsyuk and Ruslan Salei tonight, but were able to play competitively against a Nashville team that put a priority on hitting.
With Shea Weber in the box for roughing Patrick Eaves, it looked like the Red Wings had scored a goal off a shot from Niklas Kronwall. However, as Detroit fans have seen far too often, the goal was waived off as Tomas Holmstrom's screen was deemed to be interference with Nashville goalie Pekka Rinne.
The Red Wings got a second power play opportunity about two minutes later as Sergei Kostitsyn was whistled for elbowing Valtteri Filppula. Dan Cleary scored just 8 seconds into the power play as Henrik Zetterberg dragged the puck below the goal line and passed the puck through the crease to Cleary. Cleary tapped it past Rinne for a 1-0 Detroit lead at 19:38 of the first period. The goal was Cleary's 23rd of the season.
Follow the jump for the second and third period, analysis, video and shot charts.
Jimmy Howard had a few great saves in the first half of the second period, but the Predators were able to solve him at 8:42 of the period. Patric Hornqvist took the puck down the boards to Howard's left and after passing Brian Rafalski, centered the puck to Blake Geoffrion. Geoffrion had his stick on the ice and deflected the puck up and off Howard's mask. The goal was Geoffrion's 3rd of the season and tied the game at 1.
Also scoring his 3rd goal of the season was Jonathon Blum, tallying the decisive goal at 8:12 of the third period. Hornqvist put a shot on net and Jonathan Ericsson went to block it. Ericsson got his leg on it to stop it, but it kicked out to Blum. Blum had a wide open net to shoot at and he didn't miss--although he almost fanned on it.
The Red Wings got a power play late in the game, but were unable to tie it up thanks to some big saves from Rinne. With the game on the line and Howard on the bench for an extra attacker, Dan Cleary lost a face-off in the Nashville zone and Ryan Suter gets the puck to David Legwand. Legwand got the empty net goal and clinched the two points for a Nashville win.
The Red Wings next play on Monday against the Pittsburgh Penguins.
:: ANALYSIS ::
- Mike Fisher/Carrie Underwood mention: 4 minutes in.
- Martin Erat with a blatant elbow on Justin Abdelkader and it doesn't get called. Shane O'Brien immediately follows that up with a hit up high on Abdelkader. Also, punching someone in the back of the head (twice) is no longer a penalty. Officiating was horrible all night, horrible for both sides involved. Let 'em play? Sure. But after a while it's ridiculous.
- Erat and Kostitsyn both might be hearing from the league after the elbows to the heads of Abdelkader and Filppula respectively. But don't hold your breath.
- The Predators came out really physical (as mentioned above). This was one of those games that makes you cringe all 60 minutes because of how players were getting dropped. Nashville's physical play set the tone for the night and it was a tough battle for the Wings to get any open ice.
- Detroit out-shot Nashville 40-39 on the night, but the Predators doubled the Wings up on shots on goal in the second period by a 19-8 margin. Rinne played really well and had some great saves tonight. He's been working his way into the Vezina Trophy discussion and after nights like tonight, why not?
- On the power play, Pekka Rinne initiates the contact with Tomas Holmstrom yet Holmstrom gets called for interference? Of course, it's Tomas Holmstrom.
- With the goalie pulled and the Wings down one, Mike Babcock has...Dan Cleary take the draw? This was after a called timeout too. It makes me wonder if Cleary was supposed to just tie up the Nashville center or ,as @sullyosis posited, to get the Nashville center kicked from the draw. Either way, it didn't work and Nashville won the draw, got the puck up to Legwand for the empty netter.
- Originally, the recap title said "Steak Busted".
:: GOAL OF THE NIGHT ::
Sadly, I only had one to choose from.
:: SHOT CHARTS ::
I'm tired and a bit pissed off so here's the full shot charts for each team, not separated by period. The second period for Detroit is on the right. Nashville's second period is on the left.
Detroit:
Nashville:
71 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
its games like these that...
i have to remind myself the game is too fast for the refs… and why sometimes its good to have an enforcer. Nashville wouldn’t have dared to pull half the crap they did if we had 1. can’t trust the refs to catch every headshot and cheapshot.
I won't say the "c" word but...
It just seems like there are games where it’s decided from the out-set that there will only be 3 penalties called all night regardless of what actually takes place on the ice. There were lots of calls that could have gone against the wings for sure – especially in the 3rd when things got really tight. But – what if Nashville had to kill off 2, 3 or 4 penalties in the 1st – would have been a completely different game. I just would like to be a fly on the wall when the refs are getting their marching orders from Toronto prior to a game like this. I just wonder…
jimmy thinks the game was well-reffed
because they just let them battle. i’ve decided this is a good thing. it tells me he was focusing solely on the puck and thus did not notice the egregious and borderline dangerous plays going on around him that were blatantly ignored by the refs. he’s doing his job. good on you, jimmeh.
Here's to hoping the Wings don't see Nashville in round 1
Because Rinne sweeping us out would be pretty infuriating. Oh well, for now it’s more competition to keep Chicago out.
Not going to happen
Playoffs are a completely different game. Preds can’t hang.
by J.J. from Kansas on Mar 20, 2011 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions
agree
even though the Preds have beaten us 4 straight times I still am not worried about the Wings winning a playoff series against them if they did meet in the playoffs
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
by TuLoRocks2008 on Mar 20, 2011 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Here's to hoping the Wings don't see Nashville in round 1
Because Rinne sweeping us out would be pretty infuriating. Oh well, for now it’s more competition to keep Chicago out.
Nashville won't get by the first round no matter who they play.
I always wonder how a team like Nashville stays in the playoff hunt, even with an all-world goalie. They are well coached, and that’s it. Doesn’t matter who’s in the lineup, they are just defensive robots out there. Told to hit at all costs, because we all know teams with no talent always resort to goon tactics. That may work in the regular season for a few games, but the talent generally will win out in the playoffs. With help like that from the refs, it’s also pretty easy to see how they win.
With all that gooning the Preds were resorting to, teams have two options to combat it. Throw an enforcer out there, which the Wings don’t have… or make them pay on the power play, which can’t happen if the refs allow them to get away with the bullsh!t they got away with last night. But I sure was glad to see the minor hooks and stuff called, becuase those are plays that really need to be looked at in order to keep the players safe out there. After all, I’ve never heard a player being out for any length time after an elbow to the head, but those vicious hooks can really do some damage.
+1
Although to be honest I don’t really mind the Preds—there’s obviously a place in the League for their playstyle and they seem to make it work. I think they’re a slightly better team than some critics give them credit for, although I will agree their offense is their weakest asset.
As far as the reffing goes I think it’s pretty obvious at this point that the NHL has a habit of preferring one result over another. I’m not saying they can/do (although frankly, maybe they did last night) go out of their way to make certain teams win or others lose, but they do influence the situation in their own way. I hate to bring this up, but take the Malkin no-suspension after Game 2, where Bettmann came out the next day and said “herp derp we hav a rool aginst stuurting fites but I dun think I feel liek inforcing it lolololol”
Did they do that because the League wanted the Pens to win the series? Probably not. Even if that had been their preference, it would be career/league suicide to actually affect it; and it would require the silence/complicity of too many people to have gone on very long without being noticed or exposed. So why did they do it? They did it because Bettmann didn’t want to take the podium the next day and tell the home team (which the Pens were for games 3 and 4) that they have to play without one of their star players. Detroit doesn’t really have anyone of that status—at least not among the reffing community— so we’re less likely to benefit from situations like that. If it had been Bert or Hank who had thrown that first punch, I would bet any amount of money they would have faced a suspension.
I think what happened last night was sort of the same thing. I don’t think the League can really tell the refs to let one side or the other win since so much of it is out of their control, but it’s pretty obvious to me that Toronto’s marching orders for this game were very, very mindful of the fact that Nashville is on the verge of a playoff spot and is playing in front of a sold out crowd every night.
No Limits.
Nashville just has our number in this year's regular season it happens
I bet they get beaten today. Just saw the video of Kronwall shoveling Eaves off the ice lmao…epic
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
Man, you guys are a bunch of whiners!
I didn’t expect that from Wing fans. I guess it’s a universal thing!
And how about when Eaves threw down Weber right before the beatdown? Didn’t anybody see that? It was probably definitely an interference call at the least. But you didn’t see that, right? In fact that BS call led to your only goal, so you actually got shut out last night if it wasn’t for that PP goal. So maybe the refs were on your side as usual this time.
And it looked like Kostitsyn hit your guy with a shoulder, not an elbow. But y’all didn’t see that either, did you?
And Holmstrom put his ass in Pekka’s face, inside the crease. But that was a chincey call too, right? A reputation call? Not really.
Pekka: dontcha wish you had one of them. I’d like to see you guys in the playoffs….we’re gonna lose of course, but we’ll go ahead and play it out anyway.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 3:37 PM CDT reply actions
LOL
>And Holmstrom put his ass in Pekka’s face, inside the crease. But that was a chincey call too, right? A reputation call? Not really.
>And Holmstrom put his ass in Pekka’s face, inside the crease.
>inside the crease.
Someone needs an eye exam.
No Limits.
to be clear here
I’m not complaining about the no-calls, for the most part. If the refs want to let em play, that’s their business. Disadvantageous for us since we don’t have an enforcer, but hey—we’re goddamn champions. We fight through that shit.
What I am complaining about is horse-shit calls like that (potentially) costing us the game. Goals are the most important thing in a hockey game; I don’t think it’s too much to ask that they be called correctly and video reviewed if necessary. If that call had gone to an unbiased video review it would have stood and we both know it.
No Limits.
No, we don't both know it....
….Holmstrom made contact with Rinne. That’s a fact. Another fact is that you can’t touch the goalie, or its no goal.
Did it throw off Rinne? Probably not. But it was a good call nonetheless cause he made contact with the goalie WHICH YOU CANNOT DO!!!
If you would’ve been awarded that goal, then how bout your PPG a couple of minutes later. Did Eaves not interfere with Weber? And did that pick not lead to a scoring chance that should’ve been called? So had the refs gotten that call right then you would not have gotten the PPG and you still would’ve lost the game.
We whooped your asses last night, now OWN IT!
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions
I have never said anything about the officiating
shit happens congrats you guys have had our number this year…and if you wanna get all YEAHHH WE WHOOPED YOUR ASS! over a regular season game then so be it…now your boys need to learn to win when it counts.
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
by TuLoRocks2008 on Mar 20, 2011 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm just telling you guys to quit whining.
Everyone on here is bitching about the officiating and calling Nashville a buncha goons. That couldn’t be further from the truth.
And what’s great about sports, is that its a new year. We’re ready to exorcise some demons this year.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions
well good luck to you guys
trying to exercise those demons and finally win a playoff series…hopefully it will be against the Canucks or Sharks…but first off you guys gotta get there first
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
by TuLoRocks2008 on Mar 20, 2011 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Nashville isn't a bunch of goons
It’s three or four goons and a bunch of no-name also rans.
by J.J. from Kansas on Mar 20, 2011 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions
so you’re whining about whining?
Winging It In Motown and now covering Hokie baseball at Gobbler Country
On The Twitter at @MrNorrisTrophy
by Casey Richey on Mar 20, 2011 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions
And BTW, we don't have an enforcer either....
….O’Brien is like your Bertuzzi. And Weber and Tootoo do not play that role. How come Bertuzzi won’t fly the flag?
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions
I honestly do not know where you're getting this
Homer was well outside of the crease and was not the one who initiated contact. It is literally as plain asday in the video replay. Rinne REACHES OUT to put his glove on Homer—not to interfere with him or anything, probably just to steady himself since he was moving laterally at the time.
I respect your team and I also respect the fact that you want them to win—I would not expect any less and do not think less of you for sticking up for your team. But you are simply out to lunch on this one; that was a good goal and he was well outside the crease. Homer had every bit the right to that ice as Rinne did, never mind that he was in no way impeded on that shot.
No Limits.
and for the record (again)
I’m not complaining about the no-calls, I’m complaining about the botched call on Detroit’s first goal. If they want to let ‘em play, that’s their prerogative. I actually tend to prefer it to the inverse.
No Limits.
exactly, obviously you (Shea 4 pres) don't know much about hockey if you think that was the right call
The contact was initiated by Rinne, not homer.. the replay clearly shows this and the fact that at the time of the goal, Homer was not in the crease whatsoever.. case and point, you’re own commentators on FSN tennessee didn’t agree with the call and called it a “reputation” call.. so obviously they saw the truth which obviously you are ignoring.
by kylegroombridge on Mar 20, 2011 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions
It was an unfortunate call for you
not a bad call.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions
no.. according to the ruleboook, it was a bad call
let’s not sugarcoat it just because you got the good end of the call
by kylegroombridge on Mar 20, 2011 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
*applause*
excellent logic, good sir. your thorough explanation and point-by-point rebuttal of my complaints/questions about that call was more than I could have ever hoped for.
No Limits.
Homer had every bit the right to that ice as Rinne did
No, he does not.
And what about my latter comment? Did Eaves pick Weber and should that have been a penalty? And if there was a penalty would the Wings have one less goal?
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:10 PM CDT reply actions
read my comment right above this.
Also, this comment clearly shows how incompetent about hockey you are.. Homer DOES have every right to that ice because it was OUTSIDE the crease.. read the rulebook buddy.
by kylegroombridge on Mar 20, 2011 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions
this
He was outside the crease, Homer did have a right to that ice. The “worst” you could say was that they got there at the same time, at which point the dealbreaker becomes who initiated contact and sorry buddy but it wasn’t Homer.
No Limits.
The rule....
http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26480
Read the whole thing before you say something else as stupid as your last comment, buddy.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease
…except that neither of those things happened
No Limits.
So now you're a ref?
And you’re interpreting the rule “correctly” whereas they did it “incorrectly.”
69.4 Contact Outside the Goal Crease – If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.
A goalkeeper is not "fair game" just because he is outside the goal crease. The appropriate penalty should be assessed in every case where an attacking player makes unnecessary contact with the goalkeeper. However, incidental contact will be permitted when the goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such unnecessary contact.
I guess it wasn’t incidental according to the ref. But at the very least, your statement that since Homo had a right to that ice is not factually based.
And are you ever gonna address my question about the PPG that you did get?
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions
sorry but
your PPG whine is moot because I never complained about the no-calls, and if you want to play that game your team should be looking at a suspension or at the very least another couple minors. You bitching about the Eaves incident when you guys spent the whole game basically trying to injure our top six forwards is like Mike Tyson filing charges against his rape victims for trying to hit him back.
takes a deep breath
Look, I know this might be hard to believe after reading that paragraph, but I’m really not trying to make you guys out to be talentless or badguys or whatever—Nashville is a good team who can beat us on any given night and I respect that. All I’m asking for is a fair game and that call wasn’t it. Believe it or not, I have actually seen good no-goals called against my team.
This was not one of them.
No Limits.
neither was the one against the Stars, for the record
just throught I’d throw that out there.
also, for posterity, here’s the replay on that atrocious call: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihf16Bio0Qo
take a gander at the overhead view starting at 1:07 and tell me Homer is in the crease. Remember also that this blog does not feature an edit key and you are on record as initially defending the call because Homer was “in the crease.”
No Limits.
tell me Homer is in the crease
I told you to read the whole rule. You obviously didn’t . It’s not about the crease. It’s about interfering with the goalie’s ability to make a save. Your boy made contact with Rinne and thus the goal was disallowed. It’s actually that simple.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Read what you wrote.
You defended the call on the basis that Homer stuck his ass in Rinne’s face in the crease
Regardless, my point stands: Homer did not interfere with Rinne. Rinne was screened, not interfered with. Learn the difference.
No Limits.
Since the goal was waived off....
….then the refs determined that he DID interfere with Rinne. And it is clear that contact was made. That’s not arguable.
Sides, although you don’t wanna acknowledge it, the ensuing PPG woulda never happened if the refs were competent so you wouldn’t have scored that goal. And you still woulda lost.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions
bq.….then the refs determined that he DID interfere with Rinne.
Yes, erroneously. Not really seeing what this post accomplishes. Obviously Walcom with his limited faculties forgot the rules and thought it was interference—that doesn’t mean it objectively was interference, especially since VIDEO FUCKING EVIDENCE pretty obviously shows that it’s Rinne who initiates contact and not Homer. Even if you want to say Homer made contact first, it’s pretty clearly incidental and does not impede Rinne’s movement within his own crease at fucking all.
Fact.
No Limits.
Has been fun arkanfel
Gotta go….good luck in the playoffs.
How fun would it be if we played you in the first round?
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Since you love strikethrough
How fun would it be if we played
youno one in the first round?
There, fixed.
It would be a blast for us…..
Fan of the Detroit Tigers, Lions and Red Wings.
It'd be an interesting series, that's for sure
Look, I got nothing against the Preds. People whine that they’re boring to watch, but I expect teams to want to win games. If that’s how Nashville does it, that’s how Nashville does it. No skin off my nose.
I don’t mean to be a dick or anything, but that call is utterly indefensible. Even though I might yell/heckle a bit I don’t mean to insult you or your team by making my case. I might think (and strenuously insist) that you’re wrong/ignorant/mistaken, but I don’t want to start a Big Thing over this. But if we had won a game on a dodgy call like that, I’d be thanking my lucky stars rather than trying to defend a ridiculous call. I’ve seen some pretty bad/stupid calls go our way over the years too and will be the first to admit we’ve probably won some games on account.
No Limits.
There you go again, saying its about the crease....
….IT AIN"T ABOUT THE FUCKING CREASE DUDE!!!
And the VIDEO FUCKING EVIDENCE shows Holmstrom going for the same piece of real estate Rinne was, thereby leading to contact.
Thus, just like you can’t touch a goalie behind the net, you can’t touch one in front of the net either.
YOU CAN’T TOUCH THE FUCKING GOALIE DUDE!
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions
your PPG whine is moot because I never complained about the no-calls
It’s moot cause YOU didn’t say something about it? That doesn’t make much sense, especially to a simpleton like me.
And it happens to everyone, but that one isn’t as horrendous as you and your cronies are making it out to be.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions
it's called "shifting the goalposts"
and is widely regarded as a specious/fallacious debate tactic.
No Limits.
by arkanfel on Mar 20, 2011 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Alrite
It was a great game. Your team won. Congratulations!! Yes, calls were made…calls were missed. For the most part, the refereeing was exceedingly inconsistent for both sides. This year, the Preds have a great team..are playing excellent hockey..unfortunately, they have not yet cemented a playoff position. Till then, please pray that your team makes the playoffs.,.
...and stop harping about what us Wings fans harp about..
cos you are not going to get anywhere with this petty chirping.
"your statement that since Homo had a right to that ice is not factually based."
wrong again.
“Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.”
every player has right to the ice, if the goalie initiates contact, that’s his own fault.
by the way, to reply to your little “homo” jab, mr. hornqvist will never. EVER. be as good as “homo”.. sorry to ruin your dreams.
by kylegroombridge on Mar 20, 2011 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions
HornQ is still young...
…but it’s flattering that you’ve heard of him being as good as Homo all the way up there in Canada Detroit.
If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Mar 20, 2011 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions
you're like a child who sticks his fingers in his ears
and goes lalalalalalaalalala
If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed
you can quote the rules all you want, that doesn’t mean the call was an objectively good one.
No Limits.
actually, you were right when you said Canada.
thus the reason I know a thing or two about hockey.. and yes, the refs thought homer made contact, but again, he didn’t. watch the replay again and make sure your glasses are on. fact is, rinne made the contact and thus it should have been ruled a good goal. I’m not sure what you aren’t seeing.
by kylegroombridge on Mar 20, 2011 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions
lol exactly, thank you for proving my point
I just read that entire thing.. again.. and every single time it talked about a goal being disallowed, it was if the attacking player made initial contact with the goalie.. again, i don’t see what you’re not getting.. Rinne initiated contact, homer didn’t touch him on his own, buddy.
by kylegroombridge on Mar 20, 2011 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Part of me is glad we keeping getting goals like this called back.
I feel it’s building quite a case should the Wings’ front office choose to send a rather large package of tapes to the league. I think the league would have to re-work some rules if asked why these goals are called back during a time when the league is still trying to promote offense. It’s bullshit that Homer has a “reputation”. It’s not like he’s had a career of railroading goaltenders. He’s one of the best screeners/deflectors in the league and the league is punishing him/the Wings because goalies have learned to exploit bad rules. It’s really screwed up how something is bad enough to get a goal called back, but not bad enough for a two minute penalty.
If I had my way and I was the coach, once we got the to playoffs, I’d have one of our bigger guys run down any goalie who comes out of the crease to initiate a disallowed goal.
Fan of the Detroit Tigers, Lions and Red Wings.
I'm reading back over the posts here and watching the tape again
and the same thing I keep coming back to is this:
Rinne is not interfered with in any way. He is screened very closely, but it’s him that reaches out to Homer as they both move laterally. For his part, I don’t think Rinne was trying to interfere with or push Homer aside, I think he was just steadying himself to keep from overskating. No possible argument can be made that Rinne was in any way prevented from or even impaired against making that save. If anything, if he’d have pushed harder he might have had a better chance to maybe get to his left a little faster. That was a great screen and shot and should have stood.
But hey, maybe we can manage to set some kind of record for consecutive games with a waved-off goal. What are we at now, three?
No Limits.
The most telling aspect of the play, Rinne makes no move to complain about the puck getting by him. Even he acts as though it was a clean play.
Outside the crease, all players (including goalies) have an equal right to the ice. Whoever gets there first gets the ice.
Homer beat him there. That’s plain and clear.
And for clarification, if I walk up to someone and touch them on the arm, that is me initiating contact, not them. Therefore, if Homer is standing in front of the crease, and the goalie puts his glove on him, that’s the goalie initiating contact, not Homer.
Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen
What happened to comment of the game?
Not that it’s important or anything. I think we can just put this game past us and move on. They played like thugs and Rinne was Vezina-good. We were missing 3 top (well, you decide on Hudler) forwards and the Preds have just had our number all year. It’s two points we didn’t earn, big whoop. Let’s see who gets further in the playoffs (if Nashville even gets there).
I'll just respond to the first and leave the stupidity that this commenter delved into later alone.
And how about when Eaves threw down Weber right before the beatdown? Didn’t anybody see that? It was probably definitely an interference call at the least. But you didn’t see that, right? In fact that BS call led to your only goal, so you actually got shut out last night if it wasn’t for that PP goal. So maybe the refs were on your side as usual this time.
And it looked like Kostitsyn hit your guy with a shoulder, not an elbow. But y’all didn’t see that either, did you?
And Holmstrom put his ass in Pekka’s face, inside the crease. But that was a chincey call too, right? A reputation call? Not really.
You mean when Eaves skated into the ice he had the right to before Shea Weber initiated contact and then dove? Well then, if we’re calling Eaves for Interference, then we’re calling Weber for diving and we’re right back where we started. Oh, except the goal was scored on the Kostitsyn elbow, which only “looks like” a shoulder to a homer fan who doesn’t want to believe that his team cheap-shots people, even though that was the second elbow by a Predator in the game.
Homer’s ass wasn’t in the crease. They got there at the same time and the rule is vaguely written. You’d be furious if they called that a no-goal against your guy. The ref had the right to make the call, but don’t try to make some glorified pedantic case based on a rule that has to be interpreted. It was a bad call. Holmstrom was not inside the crease and this was a case where neither player really “initiated the contact”.
by J.J. from Kansas on Mar 20, 2011 6:37 PM CDT reply actions
In summation,
Shea Weber for President is an idiot with the arguing skills of a child.
Winging It In Motown and now covering Hokie baseball at Gobbler Country
On The Twitter at @MrNorrisTrophy
by Casey Richey on Mar 20, 2011 7:16 PM CDT reply actions 5 recs
lmao
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
by TuLoRocks2008 on Mar 20, 2011 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Hawks/Yotes tied at 1 going into the 3rd
Flamos/Goons tied at 3 going into 3rd…crazy West race continues….Ducks were up 3-0 so quickly in that game lol
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player… by his positioning …impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to…defend his goal
So technically speaking, any time a player positions the puck inside of the net, he is effectively impairing the goalkeeper’s ability to defend his goal. Thus since Nashville is the attacking team to me, every goal they scored should be disallowed per the rulebook.
See? I can misinterpret common sense to unjustly fit a near-sighted point of view to benefits my interests, too. Oh goody, we’re all having fun now!
what kills me
is that he starts by saying it’s a good call because Homer was “in the crease,” but three or four posts later he can’t stop saying that the crease doesn’t matter. But the bottom line here is that Homer in no way impeded Rinne’s movement within his crease, and if he wants ice outside the crease he needs to get to it first and did not.
If that was not a legal screen, then such a thing does not exist.
No Limits.

by 







![Vote Pavs! (courtesy our 'Chop Guru Josh)
Vote here
[edit: DO ITTTTTTT!]](http://cdn3.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/254678/AtlWYeVCAAEewH7_small.jpg)












