Season Recap/Grades: Howard, MacDonald, Osgood
by Casey Richey on Jun 2, 2011 9:05 AM CDT
in Analysis/Reaction
Email
PrintContinuing our series of season recap and grades for the Red Wings, today we look at the goalies. Heading into the 2010-2011 season, Jimmy Howard was to be the top-dog and well, that pretty much stayed true as he followed up his rookie campaign with another impressive year. The Red Wings got some unexpected help from Joey MacDonald as Chris Osgood went down with injury. The Red Wings also tried to make a move for the KHL-fleeing Evgeni Nabokov, but those crafty goaltending stockpilers on Long Island took him off waivers before he made it to Detroit. Did that serve as a motivational factor for Jimmy Howard? Who really knows.
Preseason Expectations: In the season preview, I called for Howard to win at least 35 games again and for his GAA to stay around 2.3. Only one of these came true but hey, I'm an optimist. I also called for Chris Osgood to get more games played and about 12-15 wins. Again, I'm an optimist.
Follow the jump for the rest of the recap and grades.
Jimmy Howard came into this season as the clear-cut #1 guy in net and it's safe to say he didn't disappoint the Red Wings' faithful. If he did disappoint you, remember this: he's not Dominik Hasek. Anyway, Howard's numbers are pretty similar to his rookie campaign. In both seasons, he had 63 games played with 37 wins. He had two more regulation losses this season than his rookie year. His GAA went up by .53 and his SV% down .016, but keep in mind he put up some pretty damn good numbers last year.
What he did well: Jimmy had a good regular season and even better playoffs. Yeah, he gave up close to 3 goals a game in the playoffs, but considering some of the egregious defensive mistakes it could have been worse. Jimmy seemed to be one of the few players that showed fire from game 1 of the season to game 7 against San Jose. Howard's maturing quickly at the NHL level and showed this past season that his ability to lead a team by his work ethic in the net was no fluke during his rookie year.
What he didn't do well: Keep the goals against down. Howard had the highest GAA of any of the three Red Wings' goalies that played 10+ games. However, the Wings could afford for him to give up more goals this season as they scored more than they did last season. So, you can chalk up the high GAA and some weak goals as his big minuses on the season.
Overall grade: Jimmy had a solid regular season and although he didn't meet our statistical expectations based off of his rookie season, he won games and that's all that matters sometimes. Howard's regular season performance was going to earn him a B+, but the determination and passion with which he played in the postseason earned him an A-.
Not many of us expected to see Joey MacDonald in a Red Wings' uniform outside of the preseason games, but I think most of us will admit that we were pleased with how he played filling in for Chris Osgood. MacDonald might have earned himself a temporary contract in the upcoming season as Howard's back-up but for the time being, let's take a look back at his 2010-2011 season.
What he did well: MacDonald performed admirably in his given opportunities to fill in for Chris Osgood to be Jimmy Howard's back-up. MacDonald had some very solid performances, allowing 1 goal or less in 7 appearances (6 of 7 being a period's worth of ice-time). MacDonald wasn't always spectacular with his saves, but was good at managing the game. He did a good job of holding pucks to allow the 3rd best team in the league to get a crack at winning the puck instead of making a poor decision with the puck. Mac's level of play and the amount of effort he put forth each night was great.
What he didn't do well: MacDonald had some trouble at times and had two games giving up 5+ goals, including the 7 goals allowed debacle against St. Louis. Mac really had a small sample size to choose from and came in in relief on several occasions so it's kind of hard to really rip apart what he did wrong.
Overall grade: MacDonald performed better than many of us expected and earned 5 wins during the season. He did exactly what was asked of him in relief and on short notice, constantly going to Grand Rapids and back while Chris Osgood's injury status fluctuated. I think a B- is a fair grade for him.
Chris Osgood came into the 2010-2011 season hoping to get some more games under his belt than he did in the previous season. Well, he played in 12 fewer this season. Osgood was expected to play a decent amount of games in order to keep Jimmy Howard well rested, but the best laid plans of Mike and Ken oft go awry.
What he did well: Got his 400th win. Osgood had a rough season to say the least as he spent so much time off the ice but he can look back with pride at the fact that he got his 400th career win, putting him at 10th all-time and two short of Grant Fuhr. Osgood won 5 of his 10 starts so I guess that's good right? Eh...
What he didn't do well: Stay healthy. Ozzie's back-and-forth health really put the team in a tough spot all year as they had to clear space for him to come off IR only for him to have a flare up again and be sidelined for another 3-4 weeks. It's hard to rip on a guy for something that he can't really control but it did cost the team some flexibility with the roster. Also, Ozzie didn't exactly have great numbers in the games he did play and he had some pretty atrocious goals against (Phoenix shorthanded slapshot ring a bell?).
Overall grade: I think a lot of us will agree that this wasn't the way we wanted to see Ozzie play in what could be his last season in Detroit. As I mentioned earlier, it's hard to grade poorly for missing time with injury but the back-and-forth health made things difficult on the rest of the team.I think he earned a C, too little to really bump his grade up and too much to bring it down.
Thomas McCollum saw 14:37 of ice-time this season as a back-up to Joey MacDonald. McCollum and MacDonald were supposed to be the duo in Grand Rapids, not Detroit. But injuries are a big problem sometimes and MacDonald had to start a few times with McCollum on the bench behind him. In the game that we all have chosen to forget against St. Louis, McCollum saw his first NHL action and quickly gave up 3 goals for a 12.31 GAA. McCollum gets a big break here on every bit of analysis because he shouldn't have even been in the line-up.
What he did well: chart face-offs.
What he didn't do well: poke-check.
Overall Grade: Incomplete assignment.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
When I saw McCollum on there, I knew Nabby would be below him. Just knew it. You did not disappoint.
That said, I have absolutely no grief with Howard. He was the best player out there for the majority of the season and was easily the most consistent, even moreso than The Perfect Human.
Joey Mac had a season to remember as well. Not easy to play the way he did, and he did it fairly well. If we were to give him some confidence (finally, we should have given him some way back when) and make it clear he won’t spend the season in GR until we need him, I do honestly think he would make a good backup for Howard.
Ozzy… well, he got #400 and that is all that really needs to be said.
McCollum didn’t impress me. It worries me that he has not hit a point yet where he can play a period in the NHL without being crapped on. Larsson was always the next big thing, but McCollum should be more ready than this. If Ozzy retires, I REALLY hope that we ask him to go to Grand Rapids and coach. Howard may need him still, too, but we definitely need a good goalie teaching the prospects.
Joey Mac
If I remember correctly, didn’t Joey end up with 2 or 3 loses on his record after Jimmy was pulled and the team fought back from 3 or 4 goals down? Adjusted, Macs record would have been 5-3 and Jimmy 37-19. I think Mac did great for a backup and Jimmy is given a little too much praise. When I see a goalie with 63 games and only 2 shut outs, I see a GM thats just plugging the position with just good enough, not a B+ goalie. What would really give us a chance to make another run is a goalie that can steal a game for us. Not one that we need to score 4+ goals to get the W.
I think Holland should use some of Rafs cap room to get a goalie that can steal some wins for us and then also get a pair of legitimate shutdown defensemen. I was disappointed to see Gill resigned with Montreal, he would have been a great addition for the 2.5 we could have signed him for.
I disagree. The goalie position is filled exactly the way it should be, Howard will steal a game or two, see his performance in Vancouver during the injury bug. But more importantly since his cap hit is right. I would much rather see a team with the structure that Det. has rather than one where the goalie takes 4-5 mil in cap hit.
Also while I would have liked to see Howard save a few more pucks that were shot off of defensive gaffes, there were way too many times that he was hung out to dry this year.
So overall I think that Howard is the long term solution, great person, fits well into the system (not many goalies play well when they dont see a whole lot of shots), willing to protect his teammates (see Crosby vs. Howard), and his cap hit is right. Plus (and this is the part that should scare the rest of the league) I don’t feel like he has played his best season yet.
Jimmy's never going to be that type of goalie
He’s taking his notes from Ozzy, ergo he’s becoming (is?) a goalie in the Ozzy/Fuhr mold: never going to keep them all out, but always gives the team a chance to win. His numbers aren’t going to ever be phenomenal, but you know what? I bet he’s pretty high up the $/Wins leaderboard, and I’m fine with that. I’m far more concerned about the defense and defensive scheme improving than I am about the netminders.
Think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider! --George Carlin
I'm confused
are you saying that shutting another team out is the only way for a goalie to steal a game?
by J.J. from Kansas on Jun 2, 2011 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Evidently we need to sign this guy:
Think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider! --George Carlin
Agreed
Don’t say this:
I think Holland should use some of Rafs cap room to get a goalie that can steal some wins for usand then say this:
get a pair of legitimate shutdown defensemen.
You’ll have to explain to us why the Wings need a pair of “legitimate” shutdown defensemen when they have a goalie that can “steal” games. Wouldn’t the acquisition of 2 defenders mean that the goalie had a bigger margin of error?
I’d much rather have a goalie of Jimmy’s quality that is going to be consistently good (with the occasional “great” performance) behind a solid defense than a porous blue line in front of any goalie in the NHL.
by Amerinadian on Jun 2, 2011 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Lots of great points made.
So far I agree with them all. For the money, we have some excellent goaltending. Just look at the Canucks. How much money are they spending on THEIR goaltending? 10 million per year you say, maybe more? I’d say we are doing well inside the cap system to find the right people. Now, to actually see an A+ year out of another Howard… that would be awesome! Bring big Mac Attack back. He did a pretty good job considering the defensive lapses as well. Nabokov? Who needs him?
Get your Al the Octopus for the playoffs
byjenniferleigh.etsy.com/
"He's not Dominik Hasek"
because he doesn’t choke in the playoffs.
Yeah a 2.02 GAA and .925 SV% in 119 playoffs games is clearly choking.
I hate Jonathon Ericsson.
by Brion on Jun 3, 2011 5:27 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
What about the '02 cup?
When he was 16-7 with a 1.85 GAA and a .920 save %?
or the ’06 playoffs where he had an absolutely insane 1.79 GAA and a .923 save % and was only beaten by the eventual cup winning Ducks (who pulled 2 games out in OT against the Wings)?
Hasek lost 2 games in 08 (as a 43 yr old might I add) so that makes him a choker? explain that logic to me please
Just another Wings fan caught between Leafs and Sabres territory.
Not to mention he carried a Sabres team to the Finals that had absolutely no business even being in the playoffs.
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jun 5, 2011 2:20 AM CDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Winging It In Motown
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
In Association With
Latest Puck Daddy - NHL from Yahoo! Sports
- NHL Playoff Beard Watch: Blood, Sweat and Beards of unsung unshaven heroes
- Devils guarantee they’ll downplay 1994 conference finals for Game 6 vs. Rangers
- Dodger Stadium Winter Classic; 10 worst NHL fans; ‘While The Men Watch’ debate (Puck Headlines)
- Lightning GM Yzerman suggests he won’t be trading for Luongo, strengthens position for Luongo trade
- Marek Vs. Wyshynski Radio: Ron Hextall, Luke Richardson and Rangers/Devils
Latest stories and headlines from NHL.com
- Shawinigan wins, advances to Memorial Cup semifinal
- Cataractes romp to 6-1 win, eliminate Oil Kings from Memorial Cup
- Despite loss, Phoenix Coyotes build solid foundation in the desert with run to West finals
- Coyotes finish off best season ever
- Maple Leafs sign defensive prospect Petter Granberg to entry level deal
