Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Roy Nelson Willing to Pay for His Next Opponent's Drug Test

Season CSSI Wrap-up: Points Adjustments

When I took on the challenge of creating a new statistical rating system for the Red Wings this season based on the original work by Chris Hollis at The Production Line, I had a firm grasp of the scope of the task, but not quite the breadth.  The purpose of the Common Sense Scoring Index was to break through the messy and blunt statistical categories given to us by traditional (and even some nontraditional) hockey metrics to create a ratings system that would give us a precise look at what the Detroit Red Wings' players brought to the team; I wanted to find a way to make the intangible something that could be counted, averaged, compared, and rated. Through a few tweaks and some excellent reader feedback, we were able to succeed in that goal.

Looking back at the season, I wanted to attempt to further break down the context of the stats and create a system by which we could see some differentiation in how the numbers for each player came to be.  As a result, I've gone back over the regular season and have broken down every single adjustment into sub-categories to give us more insight to how the project worked out and to give us a more in-depth look at exactly what we were trying to capture in the first place, a way to count all the ways the Red Wings contributed to their team this season. 

Follow me after the jump for a look at the points adjustments made this season..

Star-divide

First up, I've separated out all of the points adjustments into eight categories.  Those are as follows:

Screener's Assists: Given to a player whose body position prevented a goaltender from seeing a puck to make a save.
Third Assists: Given to a player judged to be the third person in a play worth of earning an assist for a goal.
Fourth Assists: Given to a player judged to be either fourth or fifth in a play worth of earning an assist.
Self-Assists: Awarded to a player judged to have made an assist-worthy play on a goal he scored himself.
Non-Touch Assists: These are given to a player who, by positioning, prevented a player from the other team from being able to make a play to prevent a goal being scored. 
Bonus Assists: Awarded to a player on a play which has been judged that, by its virtue, is special enough to warrant giving the same player more than one assist on the same goal.
Assist Lost: Designed to keep track of times when an official assist has been taken from a player due to context.
Goal Credit: Designed to track goals awarded or lost due to the context of a scoring play.

Let's take a look at the totals for each player.

Player Screen   Third    Fourth     Self    Non-Touch   Bonus     Lost    Goal Credit Total
Datsyuk, Pavel 1 3 0.5 5.5 2 4 0 0 +16
Zetterberg, Henrik 0 5 2 6.5 1.5 2.5 -1 -0.5 +16
Holmstrom, Tomas 12 3.5 0 4 1.5 1.5 0 -0.5 +22
Franzen, Johan 0 7.5 1 8.5 2.5 1.5 0 0.5 +21.5
Filppula, Valtteri 0 3 2 8 2 1 0 -0.5 +15.5
Bertuzzi, Todd 3 3 0 3 1 1 0 1 +12
Hudler, Jiri 0 3 0.5 5 4 2 0 1 +15.5
Modano, Mike 0 4.5 0 1 0.5 0 -1 0 +5
Cleary, Danny 6 3.5 0 5 2 2.5 -0.5 -1 +17.5
Helm, Darren 0 3 0 3 1.5 1 0 0 +8.5
Abdelkader, Justin 1 1 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 0 0 +7
Miller, Drew 0 3.5 0 1.5 1 0.5 0 -1 +3
Draper, Kris 0 0 0 0 2.5 1 0 0 +7
Eaves, Patrick 0.5 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 +6.5
Mursak, Jan 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 +0.5
Tatar, Tomas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emmerton, Cory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lidstrom, Nicklas
0 10 1 1 2.5 0.5 0 0 +15
Kronwall, Niklas 0 8 0.5 2.5 1.5 1 0 0 +13.5
Rafalski, Brian 0 5 3 0 1.5 1 -1 0 +9.5
Stuart, Brad 0 5.5 0 0 0 0.5 0 -0.5 +5.5
Salei, Ruslan 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 +4
Ericsson, Jonathan 0 3 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 +3.5
Kindl, Jakub 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 -0.5 +1
Janik, Doug 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 +0.5

 

As you can see, there is plenty of reason that Tomas Holmstrom is considered the best net-front presence in the league. Without his contributions, the Red Wings are looking at a possibility of 12 fewer goals scored.  This is not an insignificant amount over the course of a season.  Danny Cleary came in second with only half that number.  Todd Bertuzzi's three goes very well to show the same thing that the Zdeno Chara net-front experiment through the first two games of the Cup Finals showed: having a big body in front of the goal does not equal results. Wings fans understand better than most how hard it is to do what Homer does night in and night out.

Meanwhile, looking at Johan Franzen's numbers showed just what an offensive powerhouse he can be.  When he wasn't busy setting up plays without getting official credit, he was running give-and-go plays to help set himself up for goals and doing a good job using his body in the offensive zone to keep defenders away from puck-carriers.  He had nearly as many total points adjustments as Homer's team-leading +22, but did so without a single assist credit for screening a goalie.  He was generally not used in the net-front role, but I can't help but think it's also a confirmation that he spent much less time in the middle of the ice in front of opposing netminders than we all would have liked to have seen.

Jiri Hudler makes a bit of an interesting case here, as he was awarded self-assists on half his goals this season and also led the team in running either decoys or picks with four non-touch assists.  Seems that the biggest complaint about him (that he would go invisible) was also one of his better assets.  If he's still with the team next season, I would expect those numbers to improve.  On the other hand, Valtteri Filppula was also awarded self-assists on half of his goals.  The numbers (taken in context with more traditional numbers) suggest that he is still too reluctant a shooter and did not do as much work in the playmaker department. However, I'll caveat this will full context that by virtue of Filppula being a center and having more defensive responsibility than Hudler, he also had significantly fewer opportunities to spend time in the offensive zone simply "being in the opposition's way."

In fact, when comparing Datsyuk's and Zetterberg's numbers to the rest of the team, a disparity between centers and wingers for offensive responsibility (at least on the scoring lines) becomes more apparent.  When we get to the plus/minus adjustments, you'll see the distinction in roles play a much larger part in scoring changes. Pavel and Hank did a fantastic job as playmakers, but are hardly expected to stand in front of goalies.

I'll finish with a small regret in a way that the scoring turned out.  Nick Lidstrom led the team with ten total third assists this year. I know that four of those bonus assists were what I'd call outlet passes.  These plays, originating in the defensive zone and springing the team for a quick-transition strike are among my favorites to watch and I believe they would be an important stat to keep.  Sadly, I did not have a means to separate how many of Lidstrom's official assists fit that category, so all I can say is that he had four outlet passes that weren't also counted as first or second-assists.  As the CSSI goes into season 2, I intend to keep track of those as well as to keep a running tally of each of the above points categories, so we can have a more accurate accounting of what the players are doing on the ice.

Stay tuned as later in the week, we'll go over the plus/minus adjustments and try to explain how the Wings' second-best defenseman for official plus/minus was actually the worst on the team at actually playing defense over a long season.

Comment 15 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

So… Hudler actually played well?

I am so confused.

by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jun 21, 2011 8:12 AM CDT reply actions  

Offensively, yeah he kinda did.

The plus/minus adjustments tell of Hudler only playing half a Red Wings forward’s game though. But in all honesty, if somebody had told met hat Hudler would put up 37 points this season, I would have said it wasn’t enough, but I wouldn’t have demanded a trade or anything.

On the other hand – most of those good numbers came during the stretch when he was playing with Datsyuk. Without going back through game-by-game, it’s hard to show even more behind the figures. Hudler showed that, when you put a world-class centerman on a line with him, he can do all the good offensive things that we love. However, Hudler is still the weird case that has the talent to be a top-six guy, but isn’t. If he spends the whole season with Datsyuk, then we might all be getting #26 tattoos together, but that’s not his role on this team. He has to play better with the linemates he’s given.

Ultimately, half of the season review for Hudler shows that he was better offensively than a lot of people gave him credit for. It still doesn’t mean that overall he played at an acceptable level.

by J.J. from Kansas on Jun 21, 2011 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Did you keep an Excel spreadsheet of all the data or just a running tally? I’d be interested in seeing how things looked over the stretch of the season.

by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jun 21, 2011 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nerdily enough

I have a pencil-and-paper sheet for every game tallied individually. I had to do it that way when the first run through the data produced severely flawed results most likely caused by fatigue and what the Robot Devil likes to call “stupid hands”. What is on the table above represents all the electronic data that I have on the points adjustments.

The plan for next season is currently to have an individual table tally in each CSSI post and to have the running tally updated in every post instead of linking to a master list. This is slightly more copy-and-pasting, but it will give a better look to see the chart at any point in the season as it stood on that day.

by J.J. from Kansas on Jun 21, 2011 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

You could also set up an Excel file that has 83 sheets, one for each game and one page for the summary of the season.

by Hornecker on Jun 21, 2011 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I will probably do that too

I don’t like having to take up an entire notebook worth of copied pages that don’t have sortable numbers.

CSSI next season is going to be much more involved.

by J.J. from Kansas on Jun 21, 2011 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well...

If you ever need help with either sorting the data or finding new ways to display it I would be more than happy to help, looking at large amounts of data is what I do all day and I’d like to think that I’ve gotten rather good at it. Unfortunately I possess neither the time nor the knowledge of positioning or anything else, which reading the past CSSI post helped a lot, to offer more than that.

by Hornecker on Jun 22, 2011 7:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was wondering if you had kept track of 3rd and 4th assists.

In fact, I thought of it sometime in January or so but didn’t want to mention it and feel like I was downplaying your efforts or making you go back and re-work everything.

By the way, I am still working on a penalty minute/times shorthanded comparison of teams in the regular season vs. post-season since the lockout. Really I have all the information down, I just need to finish a summary of it. I’d also like to have it presented in a better format than 7 excel sheets, but that’s probably how it will turn out.

I hate Jonathon Ericsson.

by Brion on Jun 21, 2011 8:56 AM CDT reply actions  

I got a couple emails asking for the data right around the same time. I had already been thinking that this was something I want to look at, but I was just kind of too stupid to start tracking from that point forward thinking from the “In for a penny, in for a pound” line of thought that I was already going to have to go back game-by-game and count stuff, so I might as well put it off until after the season.

I’m looking forward to the penalty minute/times shorthanded stuff. I was going to ask you about that soon.

by J.J. from Kansas on Jun 21, 2011 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good work

I appreciate the work you did here, it’s very informative and interesting. I do have a question though – should you be including that “non-touch assists” category here in offensive stats? Your definition states that it’s really a defensive stat, in that it stops a player from the other team from scoring.

It’s confusing to me, and I can see it as being one of two scenarios: the definition here is not the correct one for the offensive stats, (should be “a player who, by positioning, helped a goal be scored”), or it’s a defensive stat. I figured those would come later in your adjusted plus-minus post.

Just asking for some clarification, to make sure I read that right.

by jameshstephenson on Jun 21, 2011 9:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Sorry about the confusion

a non-touch assist is when a player does something in the offensive zone to prevent a defender from making a play to prevent a goal by the Wings.

For instance, if Bertuzzi enters the zone with Filppula and Franzen on a 3-on-2 rush and drives the net, forcing the defenders to back off for Franzen to get behind him in the slot and receive a pass from Filppula to score a goal, Bertuzzi would be given a non-touch assist because what he did certainly was a vital part of the Wings being able to score, but he never did end up touching the puck on the play.

It’s kind of an offset of a screener’s assist, except a non-touch assist pertains to everybody in front of the goalie.

by J.J. from Kansas on Jun 21, 2011 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

So, how long before the Red Wings start paying you to track player development? Seriously, thanks for doing this; one more reason I never have to go back to the Free Press for Red Wings analysis. I am, however, disappointed that you failed to keep your promise of using three spaces after each period.

by Ricardo Efendi on Jun 21, 2011 4:59 PM CDT reply actions  

I just couldn't do it

I tried, but it looked ridiculous with three spaces. Probably as ridiculous as two spaces looks to everybody else.

by J.J. from Kansas on Jun 21, 2011 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Holy shit

The stats with the intense breakdown come with an intense breakdown of their own? Do you also have everything sorted by day of the week?

Fan of the Detroit Tigers, Lions and Red Wings.

by Elfuego51 on Jun 21, 2011 6:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Herculean effort

Obviously a labor of love. Or insanity. Either way, thanks a lot!

by Big Z in Orlando on Jun 22, 2011 3:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Detroit Red Wings.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Rafiki_small
Red Wings with a shot at the 2012-2013 Calder Trophy
De_small
Should we Re-sign Abby? Am I the only one?
Small
Parise vs Suter
Small
Reasons why the 2011-12 Detroit Red Wings season was great
Small
What's next on Defense?
Small
More Thoughts on What Went Wrong
Small
Corey Perry? Strange coincidence
Small
Anyone else getting scared of the worst-case-scenario?
Epic_sax_guy_plz_by_epicsaxguyplz-d31pmuj_small
Great Moments in St. Louis Sports History
Small
Looking beyond next year...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


The Gentlemen

Images_small J.J. from Kansas

Simpsonsabbey_small Amerinadian

Dsc07546_small JeffHancock41

Editor

Jabdelkadercamp08_small stripe

Author

Small Robocop

Photochop Guru

Whiteknight_small Josh Howard