Nostalgia: The Lost Season
Lockout. That is a word being thrown around quite often at the moment. Both the NFL and NBA have locked their players out in a bitter labor dispute between the owners and players as owners try to combat skyrocketing expenses. The players, for obvious reasons, are trying to keep their slice of the pie, so to speak.
Fans of either league both worry that an entire season may be lost over this, and they have good reason: the NHL missed the entire 2005 season. Those were dark days marred with heated lies and accusations from both sides and deadlines to meet if a season was to be saved.
The lockout changed the league forever. Everything from the salary cap to the trapezoid to the two line pass have led the game in an entirely different direction than it had been headed. With that, let's go back and re-live that awful year without hockey.
The first time I remember hearing about a possible lockout was during the 2004 Stanley Cup Playoffs. The Wings, unfortunately, ran into a little problem that year in the second round. The Brick Wall's name was Mikka Kipprusoff and he was a thorn in our side the entire six-game series. I still have nightmares about playing him (you know, the kind where you are on a breakaway against Kipp and realize you don't know how to skate.)
Throughout the entire playoffs, broadcasters and people involved with the game spoke about the looming lockout. It was this dark rain cloud hanging over everyone's head. Even the dual-Cinderella story of Calgary and Tampa Bay making the Finals couldn't overcome the feeling of dread surrounding the league. Perhaps the only moment that the sun showed through was when Gary Bettman handed the Cup to Dave Andreychuk who had waited 22 seasons to feel the weight of the magnificent trophy in his arms. The next morning, however, that storm had reappeared on the horizon.
I was only 15 that summer and my knowledge of the inner workings of the NHL was limited. To be honest, I knew that the Wings paid a lot to win a lot and that Glen Sather was horrible at what he did. Beyond that, I was clueless. I started to read up on the situation online and found a lot of biased information out there. Everything seemed to be slanted to skew public opinion in favor of either the players or owners. In the end, though, all the hatred from the fans was focused on Gary Bettman, the commissioner who was leading the league to a lockout.
It was a long summer spent listening to the two sides try to hammer out a deal. The owners were playing hardball, demanding things like a hard cap and an emphasis on scoring and offensive flow to decrease player salaries and increase profits. I didn't know what to think or who was right or what I wanted to happen. The only thing I did know was that I hated whomever was inching us closer to missed hockey.
Right around the time when the preseason normally starts, the previous CBA was set to expire. Ten years old and the result of the only other NHL lockout, the CBA was extremely loose. It allowed our Detroit Red Wings to essentially buy the 2002 Stanley Cup by spending nearly $70 million on just player salaries that season (for comparison, next year's cap is set at $64 million). The words most commonly thrown out there were "salary cap."
The owners wanted to strictly limit what the players could make. They didn't want teams spending $100 million on players in a season, a milestone that the Rangers, Red Wings, and Flyers were all racing toward. I remember one interview on ESPN with someone from the union saying that a salary cap was 'just a way for owners and GMs to protect them from themselves' and that 'smart spending would negate any need for a cap while avoiding any limitations on player salaries.' To me, that sounded right on the mark. I remember saying things like "the rich get richer" and "the fans are the ones who will lose." In the end, though, it did not matter.
On September 16, 2004, the CBA expired and the forever looming lockout finally began. There was absolutely no hockey and there would be no hockey until they figured things out. Bettman was evil, the owners were greedy, and the players were dumb for stopping their jobs for a year. I hated that day with a passion and even my grandfather was saddened by the news; his usual "Hello, Joshua!" greeting was replaced with "Josh, can you believe hockey is done for?"
It was another month until the possibility of a missed season started showing up. You see, no one cares if you lose pre-season or free agency or training camps or a draft. People only start caring once games are lost. Once a few games of the 2004-2005 season were lost, the media started scrambling with stories about how the NHL lockout would cost the league an entire season and, perhaps, destroy what remained of the league.
Bullshit. That was what I said and it was just the second time I had ever sworn in my lifetime. There was no way there would be a full year without hockey, the two sides would come to an agreement. They had to, right?
The players didn't really think so. Players spread around the globe as they tried to stay active. Players like Pavel Datsyuk and Vincent Lecavalier bolted for Russia while Joe Thornton and Dany Heatley opted for neutral ground in Switzerland. Closer to home, Chris Chelios, Kris Draper, and Derian Hatcher chose to play with the Fraser-based Motor City Mechanics. I remember an episode of Scrubs where Dr. Cox (played by John C. McGinley, longtime friend of Chelios and huge Red Wings supporter) sported a Chelios Mechanics jersey in lieu of his standard Red Wings apparel. With their home arena just 10 minutes from my house, I found this to be unbelievably cool.
Overall, the year was awful. As we inched forward, the talks of a lost season gained steam. Media members set dates for when a season could be salvaged, some as soon as Christmas. It felt like reporters wanted there to be no season. Possible game totals dwindled from 80 to 70 to 60 quicker than I ever thought possible. All Star Weekend was cancelled. Finally, on February 16, 2005, Gary Bettman announced the cancellation of the 2005 NHL season. The league wished for a $40 million salary cap and eventually raised it to $42.5 million, but the players were willing to go no lower than $47 million. The season was lost.
No Red Wings for a full year. I remember hearing that on ESPN when I got home from school that day and feeling ill. There would be no hockey at all until at least September and all anyone could do is sit around and wait for the matter to be resolved.
That conclusion did not come for many more months. The draft was still held and every team was given a chance at the first pick (and thus Crosby), though Pittsburgh won it for their third straight Top 2 pick (selecting Marc-Andre Fleury, Evgeni Malkin, and Sidney Crosby). It finally ended on July 22, 2005.
Despite having hockey back, it was not the same. Two-line passes were, thankfully, eliminated. The "Brodeur Rule" put four more lines on the ice to stop goalies from moving the puck. The salary cap forced the Wings to cut 50% of their pre-lockout salary, mainly by buying out Derian Hatcher, Ray Whitney, and longtime fan favorite Darren McCarty. The move effectively ended McCarty's career.
In addition to McCarty, many others saw their careers shortened by the lockout. Previously mentioned Dave Andreychuk only made it into January of the next season. Scott Stevens, legendary defenseman, never played another game. The likes of Sakic, Yzerman, Shanahan, and others likely saw their careers shortened by the lockout. Yzerman and Shanahan retired just short of the huge 700-goal mark that former teammate Brett Hull had reached while with the Wings just a few seasons previous. The amount of hockey lost due to the lockout was, and still is, substantial.
With all that said, we now face another looming lockout. With the salary cap now spiraling out of control, the NHL may be forced to lock the players out again next summer to wrangle that deal out. Thankfully, the NHL stands to gain far too much from the NBA and NFL possibly missing games to throw that all away. A lockout may happen, but I openly doubt that we would lose games this time around.
Unfortunately, though, we have already lost enough games for one lifetime.
39 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
To be honest, I knew that the Wings paid a lot to win a lot and that Glen Sather was horrible at what he did.
Unfortunately, the lockout didn’t solve all of the problems in the NHL.
Nope, unfortunately it hasn’t. I’m still amazed he has a job, to be honest.
Then again: Dave freaking Tallon got a second chance, so I guess I shouldn’t be one bit shocked.
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jul 6, 2011 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions
Don't worry
I thought that too until last week. Not that I’m ever gonna stop calling him Dave
"If you were a man I'd punch you, I'd punch you right in the mouth."
I’m not sure he deserves to have his real name be known.
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jul 6, 2011 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Not with the contract he gave Kopecky he doesn't
"If you were a man I'd punch you, I'd punch you right in the mouth."
Or Jovanovski. Or Upshall. Or Fleischmann.
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jul 6, 2011 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Imagine if he had used that money and threw it at Vokoun
Maybe his team wouldn’t be using (uh… Clemmenson?) as their starter
"If you were a man I'd punch you, I'd punch you right in the mouth."
Jose Theodore, actually.
That said, Vokoun wasn’t exactly doing any good for them either. Letting Vokoun walk may have been the smart (gasp!) move for Tallon
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jul 6, 2011 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
It was more along the lines that they had to let him walk
Because he wants to play for a team that’s actually good (see: Washington).
"If you were a man I'd punch you, I'd punch you right in the mouth."
Uh...
He wanted to sign with Colorado. They are at least two years away from having a playoff contender, much less a Cup contender.
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jul 6, 2011 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions
The only reason they were so bad last year was because Anderson was so inconsistent (and injured meaning Budaj got a lot of starts)
Then they decided to give up and tank the rest of the season for a high draft pick They let Brian Elliot start. Brian Elliot). I imagine if Vokoun did sign in Colorado they’d have a good shot at getting in as the 7th or 8th seed. But that fell through so he ended up signing for spare change to play for Washington
"If you were a man I'd punch you, I'd punch you right in the mouth."
That works out
Because the only reason they were so good the year before that was because Anderson was better than he should have been expected to be.
by J.J. from Kansas on Jul 6, 2011 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
His 51 save shutout victory against the Sharks was something to behold
But sadly was overshadowed by Dan Boyle’s lulzy teamkilling goal
"If you were a man I'd punch you, I'd punch you right in the mouth."
Awesome in behold in person
Couldn’t miss a playoff game, not matter if I "hated" both teams. Went to the game wearing my Michigan jersey because I would get physically sick putting Avs gear on… But by the end of the game was fully rooting for the Avs.
And to clarify on this a bit
Colorado’s GAA last year (30th in the league) was 3.45
Second worst? Atlanta with… 3.14 (just a little better).
Fun question:
What was the only team in the NHL not to post a shutout last season?
"If you were a man I'd punch you, I'd punch you right in the mouth."
What was the only team in the NHL not to post a shutout last season?
Scotty Hartnell’s wife?
I heard EVERYBODY scored on her.
by J.J. from Kansas on Jul 6, 2011 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Natural Hat Trick?
Think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider! --George Carlin
Oh so that's who Philly had in net
"If you were a man I'd punch you, I'd punch you right in the mouth."
Think talk of hockey labor strife is overblown
Driven by a media with group think, with a lack of things to write about, and even less integritgy so they play fiction writer… I don’t think we’re headed to another lockout… The big issues aren’t in dispute: cap/no-cap, hard/soft cap, revenue sharing, and % of revenue for the players… What of concern is the hard $ value between the to floor and ceiling of the cap (vs. %), and the loop-holes in the contract rules. I don’t see either of these being something that the union or the owners willing to go to war over. The league issues aren’t about the labor situation, but unstable ownership situations… Ownership issues that aren’t going to be solved by player concetions, but team-by-team local revenue/expense ratios (i.e. bad arena deals).
I do not think there will be another lockout
Because the NHL has about 80-85% of their solution in place and just needs to make tweaks to it.
I hope egos don’t get in the way of this.
by J.J. from Kansas on Jul 6, 2011 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions
I hope egos don’t get in the way of this.
I fully expect it will. At some point both sides will get to a point where they will not go any further, and it won’t matter how close together they are, just how entrenched their positions are.
I hope there isn’t a lockout, but if the owners decide that they can settle their own problems by beating up on the players some more, it wouldn’t surprise me if they do just that.
Random Ramblings from a Somewhat Scattered Mind
"It is a mistake to try to look too far ahead. The chain of destiny can only be grasped one link at a time." --Sir Winston Churchill (1874 – 1965)
I wouldn't worry about egos
The players’ egos were shot when they counted the zeroes in Tomas Kopecky’s new deal. Obviously, they all want paid, but I don’t think they want to see awful deals like that if everyone can’t have them.
Fan of the Detroit Tigers, Lions and Red Wings.
As I said, I don’t think we will miss any games over the next CBA, but I do think a lockout is possible. Especially with the NBA and NFL locked out right now. The NHL has some kinks to work out before a new CBA, though, and I think the age of negotiating without a lockout ended with Bettman’s cancellation in February 2005.
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Jul 6, 2011 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
As JJ said, the main structure for a new deal is in place. If anything causes a lockout, it’s going to be internal strife among the owners, not a true conflict with the players.
I also believe the NHL owners (all 29 of them) understand how much damage was done to the sport in the last labor stoppage, and that the cancellation of even 1 game will send the NHL down to the dregs with monkeys playing poker and the WNBA. There isn’t the support in the US to allow hockey to survive another labor stoppage, unlike the NFL and NBA.
I remember one interview on ESPN with someone from the union saying that a salary cap was ‘just a way for owners and GMs to protect them from themselves’ and that ‘smart spending would negate any need for a cap while avoiding any limitations on player salaries.’
It’s true, but there’s a very fine line between “smart spending” and "getting sued by the players’ union for making anti-competitive backroom deals to institute an unofficial salary cap. Remember, both the players and the owners are all supposed to be competing amongst themselves for what’s best. The league and the union is just there to make sure that they’re not killing themselves in the process.
by J.J. from Kansas on Jul 6, 2011 1:42 PM CDT reply actions
Another added effect of that lockout
I remember entering college in 2000 as a HUGE wings fan and with a girlfriend. We split in 2001 and I remained single until that 2004 lockout. Without 82 games to watch a year and a grueling 3 month playoff, I was able to meet and spend some quality time with a nice young lady that I continued to date almost 4 years.
Since then my hockey appetite has grown. I watch and play an unhealthy amount (if there really is such a thin). NO relationship I’ve had since has ever started mid season. They always seem to get going between June and October…the ones starting closer to June standing a much better chance of survival.
Any one else have this problem? Or are my priorities just that whacked.
I’ve been married for far too long, but I tend to neglect my wife for long stretches during hockey season.
So in other words, you’re perfectly normal.
by Amerinadian on Jul 6, 2011 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Idea for next blog entry
Something along the lines of : “Why we hate Gary Bettman.”
by Shark_fans_are_the_worst on Jul 6, 2011 4:01 PM CDT reply actions
Not fair for a blog entry
That would make a good book title though.
by J.J. from Kansas on Jul 6, 2011 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions
the lockout made me the fan i am today
i used to get into a rhythm every year: basketball and hockey in the winter, baseball in the spring and summer, football in the fall. then when hockey was noticeably absent, i had to wonder what was going on, and i found out games weren’t being played, but i didn’t really care at the time what was happening. i just knew i wouldn’t be seeing hockey. fast-forward a year and the same thought entered my mind: “whatever happened to hockey?” i start flipping channels and i stumble upon a Kings game on my local FSN. i’ve been a Red Wings fan since ’96, but seeing that Kings game brought me back to hockey fan made me the die-hard i am today. seeing that game just seemed to kindle a new interest that laid dormant while hockey was busy trying to figure its labor stuff out and put out interest in all the other sports.
You wanna tell me that to mah face?!
A lot is riding on the NFL and NBA negotiations right now
If the NFL and NBA end up locking out their players into the season and start losing games or maybe even a season, it can radically change the landscape of the NHL negotiations.
I think the biggest thing right now is to negotiate early, the NFL got caught very much off guard by pushing the negotiations back until a month before the end of the deal and ultimately that lead to a toxic negotiating environment and too much pressure to get a deal done with no real room for real bargaining.
I am pretty convinced that the players will not accept another 25% takeback like they did last time, however any significant drop in salary cap is going to have to be accompanied by some sort of way for teams to get out of bad contracts.
Hopefully though
Even with the lockout in the NFL atm, hopefully it wont get to the point where the ‘05 NHL Season was cancelled. The owners in the NFL know that they’re facing losing a TON of money ($9B) if they start losing games and such. I kinda for a while after the ‘05 lockout didn’t watch hockey of any sorts, then the ‘07-’08 Wings winning the cup (and the playoff run they were a part of) got me back into it
2005, never wanted hit something with a blunt object so hard in all my life.
Then came 2009 when I got laid off before getting fully invested in my company. Man did I have some dark thoughts….still do, want to write a novel. An evil novel.
after the last lockout I almost didn't come back
If they have another one, I’m through. Life is too short to waste time on a sport that by that point would only make me angry, not be at all enjoyable.
I’d probably dump my only two hockey jerseys to make a clean break of it, and a few other Red Wings stuff I have. Like breaking up and getting rid of all the gifts your now-ex got you, throwing them away or donating to charity so you don’t have a trace of the previous relationship left in your life any more. I never had so much fun shredding papers in my life when I destroyed the last documents I had with my ex-fiance’s name on them. :)
Random Ramblings from a Somewhat Scattered Mind
"It is a mistake to try to look too far ahead. The chain of destiny can only be grasped one link at a time." --Sir Winston Churchill (1874 – 1965)
Impossible for me
I was able to survive the 2005 lockout because I was in Japan for the 2002/2003 season (no hockey in Japan). I came back for the 2003-2004 season and then….2005. I could weather it because I’d done it before and I became busy with hanging out with my Japanese friends. I learned that soccer was an ok sport to play (can’t watch it though).
What was really hard was 2006 – 2009 when I was working in Japan. I MISSED the 2008 Stanley Cup win! MISSED IT! I saw it later, but still…
Anyhow, after coming back to the U.S. I don’t think I can leave hockey again. It’s like a need: Eat, Sleep, Wife (sex included), Hockey…not necessarily in that order.
You're wrong Mick. That blob may have peanuts, but it ain't no Baby Ruth.

by 

















