Todd Ber"two"zzi: Red Wings 3 - Blackhawks 2 (OT)
Now that's more like it.
Last week I wrote about the Wings and their identity. One of my main beefs with this team has been how they try to adapt to the style of their opponent rather than just playing their game and making the other team try to beat them.
The Wings took that advice to heart in the first period, absolutely dominating an over-matched Hawks team through 20 minutes. A third period surge by Chicago and 2 lucky bounces earned them a loser point, but the Wings re-asserted themselves in the overtime period and for the second time in less than a week, won a close-contested game in overtime. The win marked the 14th straight at home for Detroit, tying a franchise record.
The Wings' power play, which has been absolutely anemic the past 2 weeks, struck midway through the first in a period which the Wings absolutely dominated. Ian White's point shot was tipped in by Tomas Holmstrom, who managed not to trip any Blackhawk defenders into the path of the shot. Todd Bertuzzi increased the lead when he converted on a breakaway, lifting a backhand past Corey Crawford, who was the only reason the Wings weren't up by 10 after the first.
It looked like the Wings were well on their way to an easy victory. It turned out to be yet another intense battle for 60+ minutes.
The second was more of the same of the first, although the Hawks began to push the play as the period went on. The Hawks were gifted a goal when a fluke bounce off the end boards came out in front, and even Andrew Shaw couldn't miss and the Hawks were within a goal.The third was the polar opposite of the first. Chicago came out fired up and at one point were out-shooting the Wings 15-2. However, the Wings weathered the storm, including a double minor to Drew Miller for high-sticking, and looked poised to win their 14th straight at home. However, Jonathon Toews won a faceoff cleanly and fed the puck back to Marian "Mr January" Hossa. His shot went in off Nicklas Lidstrom's skate and in, ensuring the Wings will wait at least another day before taking their rightful place at the top of the Central Division.
I don't know what happened, but the Wings reminded everyone, including the Hawks, that they were the better team when the score was tied, and they made the Hawks their bitch for 5 minutes. The shots were 9-0, and I think Howard could have gone for his post-game shower the way the Wings controlled the puck. Bertuzzi batted a rebound out of the air and past Crawford, and the Wings got the two points that they deserved.
- It's well known that serial killers suffer from some sort of mental illness, and today Todd Bertuzzi displayed classic signs of manic depression. He surprised no one by scoring on a breakaway, given his abilities in the shootout. He also knocked home the winning goal when he batted it in out of midair. However, the rest of his game was uneven. He had one bad giveaway, and there were numerous passes that he couldn't make and more that ended up in his feet. However, scoring that OT goal earns him raves.
- Henrik Zetterberg almost won the game himself late in the third when he took over in the last 5 minutes. Every time he touched the puck, he was a threat to score, something we haven't said a lot this year. Only a post prevented the Wings from getting 2 regulation points today.
- Drew Miller is proving why he will never spend time in the Leino Lounge. He had 6 shots to tie with Bert for the game lead, and in the first he was all over the Hawks' defense, going to the net and getting chances. It's too bad he couldn't convert that breakaway after his penalty, but it worked.
- Whatever NBC did on the audio, kudos. The on-ice sounds were very pronounced, so much so it felt like being there, and the commentary was very quiet. I guess that's the compromise to having Ed Olczyk call games involving the team he works for, since he was once again in his homerific glory all day, pointing out all the things the Wings did wrong and never showing anything his pwecious wittle Hawks did that might have been illegal. The fact that Pierre was also muted is just an added bonus. I can dig Emerick, but that's the last time I listen to a game on NBC involving the Hawks that Edzo is involved with.
- Speaking of Edzo, can he go and review Rule 74? That's the one dealing with Too Many Men, and it would be nice if he understood that if the "offending" team doesn't touch the puck or affect the play, then there's no penalty. The horse, it is dead, Eddie.
- I heard the song "anything you can do I can do better" midway through the third period as Jimmy Howard matched Corey Crawford big save for big save. Both goals that got by Tiberius were flukes, and he was fantastic throughout the game, especially in the third when the Wings stopped skating. That performance is why Howard will be in the Vezina talk at the end of the year. I would be remiss if I didn't point out how good Crawford was, as he was the only reason the Wings didn't run away and hide.
- We've picked on the PK a lot this year, but that kill in the third period was a thing of beauty. Only 2 shots for the Hawks over the course of 4 minutes, and the Wings spent at least a minute in the Hawks' zone. My guess is that the Hawks really missed Patrick Sharp on the power play.
- Both teams are going to spin this game differently. Chicago fans will talk about the resiliency of the Hawks as they came back from a devastating first period. They'll point to the third period as somehow proof that they were the better team, and simply didn't play their game in the first and through the second. You'll hear talk about how the 15 shots they threw at Jimmy Howard shows how when they assert themselves, they could dominate play. The thing is that they will be wrong. The Wings came out, showed that they were the better team, then sat back. You know how I know that I'm right? The overtime. The Hawks were out-muscled, out-shot, out-chanced, out-skated, out-played, and just plain out-classed during the overtime period, despite having a real chance to wrest a victory out of the jaws of defeat, but I imagine that was due to being so tired from playing hard for 1 whole period. Bottom line is the better team won today.
62 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great write up
I couldn’t have put it better myself about the way Detroit controlled their play in this game. Sure, Chicago had some life in the third, but we saw all season that when we take a step back periodically in games, Howard has been outstanding.
When did this Sharp meme start?
Anyway, great game. Better team won tonight.
I would like to see a Hawks/Wings series in the playoffs, so hopefully the Wings don’t run into the Sharks first, cause well… you know. :P
Hawks would win a playoff series in 7 though. ;)
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
Last game after Sharp got hurt
all 3 of the announcers asked how much the Hawks missed Sharp on the PP in a span of 5 minutes.
"More giveaways than the Salvation Army" - Mickey Redmond
Jimmy got outplayed in the first two
Crawford pretty much kept Chicago in there throughout the first 40. Then of course the mishandling stuff… I don’t think Jimmy deserves POTG. Bert all the way
Courtesy a Yahoo! Commenter
Once again Jimmy Howard blows yet another lead with less than a minute left in the game only to have his team bail him out in overtime. But the Blackhawks get an an undeserved point thanks to Howard. The St. Louis Blues get rid of Ty Conklin to sign Brian Elliott for less money. The Detroit Red Wings foolishly resign Ty Conklin. Time to clean house.
Dump Jimmy Howard and
Dump Ty Conklin
Hahaha, his username is Coach Isaiah Thomas, and he always posts stuff like this. The ultimate troll. I think it’s hilarious, but it made me wonder if there were people out there who agree with this sentiment. I hope not…
by eight_legged_freaks on Jan 14, 2012 4:03 PM CST reply actions
He's an idiot.
It would have been 5-2 by the end of the third if Howard hadn’t stood on his head.
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
Isn’t that guy Coach Isaiah Thompson?
by wingsluver4ever on Jan 14, 2012 7:56 PM CST up reply actions
I'm saving this
For the next (and one-millionth) time that I have to explain to people that I don’t read comments at Yahoo!
by J.J. from Kansas on Jan 14, 2012 9:52 PM CST up reply actions
Wise choice, fine gentleman.
I, too, learned a long time ago to avoid those comments. Thanks for offering a site that rises above that vitriol.
by InMDmissingtheD on Jan 14, 2012 10:39 PM CST up reply actions
I like looking over the Second City Hockey game threads
it’s cute how much they really hate us. Especially since the same vitriol isn’t returned by our side.
Manager of the Mursak League's Banzai Bananas. BANZAI!!!
The same is said by our side
It’s just blocked by our top hats and monocles.
Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen
by Robocop on Jan 14, 2012 4:35 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
What a freaking game to be at.
It pisses me off the Hawks still got a point. Jimmy’s puck-handling is solely to blame for that and almost to blame for giving them the straight up win.
Kudos to Bertuzzi for making it enjoyable game after his affinity for the penalty box got me there.
There were a ton of Hawks fans there, including the typical ones right behind me trashing every stupid thing they could. “Ohh, the screens are so small……….their pre-game opening is so lame………there are so many empty seats…….”
Fan of the Detroit Tigers, Lions and Red Wings.
Not 100% Jimmy's fault
The puck hi a spot on the boards where the Zamboni door opens and redirected it to hit the heel of his stick and then out in front of the cage. The odds of that happening are so slim, that’s the first time I’ve seen it in almost 20 years of watching the Wings at the Joe.
Manager of the Mursak League's Banzai Bananas. BANZAI!!!
Im going to be honest
I was happy to see bert out of the lineup on thursday and thought Mursak would be taking that spot, because I had lost trust in him. I stand corrected because he actually played a very good all around game today…. all I ask is for consistency, is that too much Bert?
I missed the game today
Apparently my body did not want me to get up and watch hockey at 11 a.m. CST. But I just watched the highlights…. how the hell did we let that one get to OT?
"I believe in a good kick in the ass. This— I believe. " -- Walker Percy
I tweet about stuff sometimes @jackhitts.
Damn boards. Howard as to be more ready for that one.
Howard was a little lazy on the play that Chicago scored on the empty net. The one beautiful kick save when the puck skipped over his stick earlier in the game highlight reel stuff. Bertuzzi was awesome from his short rest. Maybe we need to do that more often with other players. Still the Hawks only picked up their game when they got a lucky bounce and the Wings hung back. The latter part is something they need to stop doing.
Jimmy was great
but hard to see how he wins the head-to-head given Crawford’s spectacular performance.
hawks are lucky
crawford kept them in it. could have EASILY BEEN 5 or 6 to jackshit if he doesn’t play like he did. hawks came out to finally play in the third period. their “two goals” were FLUKES. lucky bounces that went their way. without those, they get SHUTDOWN & SHUTOUT. honestly every time jimmy howard leaves the crease I start to cringe…
"If we knew what the outcome would be it wouldn't be called hindsight."
First goal was a bad bounce for Detroit. 1 in a million thing.
Second goal was a standard play, a goal that gets scored a TON in the NHL.
Faceoff win, back to the point, traffic in front, richochet and in. Hardly flukey.
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
If the team that showed up for the first period shows up for an entire game...
We’re unbeatable. I firmly believe that.
Brad Stuart should be our backup goalie.
Twitter- @nkehagias
2nd City Hockey
I just read their “write up” on the matter, and I swear they are the most ignorant bunch of people in this earth. They will refuse to write anything about their players that paints them in a negative light, but they will bash bash bash us for the whole article. I couldn’t even tell who won or lost by the time i was done with that article.
So so sad.
I am starting to want to ignore SCH
Because I have met some really nice Hawks fans, and I am starting to think they (SCH) are rather unflattering representatives of their fanbase (kind of like how BSH is actually a pretty classy bunch to represent the Flyers’ fanbase, given their general reputation). It IS sad, we could be having some fun with them if it weren’t for the excessive nastiness.
Relentlessly preaching the word of TPH and converting the heathens in the NHL wasteland that is Oregon.
What the hell are you talking about?
The write-up criticized Crawford, Hossa and Kane among others for their play as of late, and that was one of the less critical write-ups for Hawks players.
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
And this is coming from somebody that has been temp banned by the site a few times.
So it’s not as though I’m a diehard fan of the place or anything.
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
I generally only read SCH after a Hawks loss
(To revel in their agony) And I see you getting yelled at all the time!
Yeah, cause I'm pretty critical of the team.
And I use alot of hyperbole and sarcasm in my comments.
Put those all together in front of an audience with a massive inferiority complex, and you have a powder keg of homerism ready to explode.
I shrug it off cause I enjoy conversing with some of the more intelligent members.
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
I scrolled though the 3rd period thread of the previous game where the Hawks got a bs penalty shot, failed to score, than lost in OT
I noticed you seem to stand out in all the name-calling. (Though calling the team shitty and saying it’s a one-and-done postseason at best was a top tier troll move which probably contributed to the amount of hate you recieved.)
The sun is blotted out as Joe Don Baker approaches.
It wasn't an intended troll move.
It was just how I felt at that moment, completely frustrated with the lack of a 60 minute effort from the Hawks.
I still think it’s an issue that could get them knocked out early if they match up against the wrong team, or a more disciplined team.
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
I typically enjoy SCH, because they do know the game. They spend as much time discussing their own team (or more) than bashing the opponent. If you read their write-up, they talk about what the Hawks did, not about how much they loathe the Wings.
The only thing I take exception to is Fels’ obsession with the “slow” defense of the Wings and how it can be exploited. I’ll freely admit that the Wings don’t have the most fleet-footed defensemen, but the Wings play as a 5 man unit and do have the intelligence to understand positioning, which can make up for a lack of speed. What he also fails to take into account is that in order for the Wings’ defense to be beaten, the Hawk forwards have to have the puck, which they didn’t for most of the game yesterday.
Also, the “Wings will fade because they are old” is a tired argument that has been around for 20 years. It has never been proven to be right, and this year the Wings are actually younger than they have been the past few seasons. When I hear someone say “the Wings are old”, I know that I’m dealing with someone who doesn’t watch the Wings and is just hoping that what they say is true because they can’t come up with another reason why the Wings will lose.
by Amerinadian on Jan 15, 2012 12:54 PM CST up reply actions
THANK YOU
My main irritation witht hat game wasn’t even in the game – it was Edzo making up penalties and being a shameless homer. That’s fine if the Hawks are your team, but TRY to pretend to be even a little impartial (or knowledgeable about hockey) on a national broadcast, damn.
Relentlessly preaching the word of TPH and converting the heathens in the NHL wasteland that is Oregon.
Contact NBC
We need to figure out how to let NBC know just how bad he is. Maybe with enough negative comments someone will eventually listen. The guy is such a tool…
ROTFLMAO!!! oh look pavel pan, it’s captain hook! ;) lololol
"If we knew what the outcome would be it wouldn't be called hindsight."
Whaaa?
Hook or high-sticking?
Edzo: “No! That’s interference on Pavel!!”
by Red Wing Nut on Jan 16, 2012 7:19 AM CST up reply actions
That 3rd period was absolutely nuts
and we’re lucky to have escaped that 3rd with the 1 point, what a rebound shot by Bert to win the game in OT. Thats gonna help us later when it comes down to tiebreakers
Fan of the Detroit Tigers ~ Detroit Lions ~ Detroit Red Wings! - No Town Better to be a fan of!
Fantasy: WIIM Mursak League (Wingedmule (76-73-32)) PoD Bench (PackMules (7th place)
Restoring the Roar - The '11 Detroit Lions! (10-7) Thank you for a great season!
Trivia question:
Does anyone know what kind of horn they use after a goal? Been watching hockey since the mid seventies, and have always wondered what that is…train? freighter? Anyway, hope we hear it a lot more!
Trivia question's answer
link
http://everything2.com/title/NHL+goal+horns
"If we knew what the outcome would be it wouldn't be called hindsight."
So I finally finished watching the game
I usually don’t work on Saturdays, but today sucked. I had no idea how much it would suck having to ignore the entire internet for half the day. Then when I got home, the Niners game was on.
Of all the stuff there is to be said about that game today, the only thing I have left is this:
It’s getting goddamn disgusting how much Jonathan Toews falls down. He’s slowly creeping up on Kane in my dislike rankings.
by J.J. from Kansas on Jan 14, 2012 9:55 PM CST reply actions
Yeesh, the division lead isn't going to be finalized till the last day of the season at this rate.
Detroit, Chicago and St Louis are just going to keep trading it back and forth every week.
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
I still don’t think St. Louis keeps it up all season.
by J.J. from Kansas on Jan 14, 2012 10:29 PM CST up reply actions
We'll see.
I like a lot of the talent on that team, and always felt they weren’t getting the most out of it for whatever reason.
Hitchcock might be what they needed. If that team can play up to the potential on the bench, I could see them with home-ice advantage at the end of the season. And unfortunately for us, it would come at the expense of one of our teams.
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
They'll end up fighting with Trapville
That or Trapville overtakes them.
I’m guessing
1. Wings
2. Hawks
3. Preds
4. Blues
5. That one team that sucks really bad and drags our division down
The sun is blotted out as Joe Don Baker approaches.
biggest hawks fan.....givin it to ya Detroit!!
Unreal,..if our hawks wouldda showed up in the first two periods it wouldda been an ever better game…but, alas,..your depth, and our "lack of’ at this time,..showed. Still..best part of game was wild third period, for both. Teah crawford was good, but he’s just not ‘cluth’ imo,..and our youth makes too many goofs still..and u just cant do that playin you guys. Your such a deep, smart team, it’s scary. I stil say we’ll take you in seven,..if it comes to it, but only if we grow up a lil more, get sharp back, and kane and stahlberg grow some balls. emery over crawford anytime too. I really dont like the wings, but appreciate good hockey when i see it,..and dig some of your guys too. Just sayin, we were lucky to get the point,…whatever happens come playoffs,..BEAT vANCOUVER!!!…LOL…BEST OF LUCK
Make that +2
Manager of the Mursak League's Banzai Bananas. BANZAI!!!
thanks for stopping by!
as a division rival, i’m pissed you guys got the extra point. but this was definitely a great hockey game nonetheless
You wanna tell me that to mah face?!
YET ANOTHER Detroit Red Wings blog.
Alright I've figured out the Wings biggest problem and it's not the PK
It’s the motherfucking posts. Every single goddamn game we hit the post at least twice. So right there, our goal input doubles.
(Seriously though someone name the last game in which we didn’t hit any posts at all. That’s what I thought.)
Watching the Wings game:
Other team scores, DING, we tie the game, DING, other team scores, DING, we tie the game, DING, DING, DING, we win in OT.
tl;dr: DING DING DING PING DING PING DING DING DING DING DING DING DINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
The sun is blotted out as Joe Don Baker approaches.
I would like the Goal Post Dings put to dueling banjos.
It would make for interesting parody for highlight reels.
by Idle Drifter on Jan 15, 2012 10:21 AM CST up reply actions
I counted posted we hit in the SCF in 2009, compared to the Pens
it was something 12 more throughout the series. We have a serious problem.
Hey Bettmen, can we make the nets an inch wider? I promise it’ll make the game more exciting!
I'm a Homer
by holmstrom96 on Jan 16, 2012 10:39 AM CST up reply actions
Even during the first period when the Wings were just dominating...
Eddie O would comment any time a Hawk did anything. “Great play there by …” Rarely did he ever say any good things about Detroit plays. I understand that he’s a Hawks fan and paid by them, and I probably couldn’t do any better… but when you are paid to be a national broadcaster you shouldn’t be that obvious.
You know Mickey would be just as bad if he got put on a national broadcast somehow. If you cover that team all the time, you get used to putting the whole game in the perspective of what that team is doing, since your local fans want to hear about their team. Just pretend you are watching the Hawks broadcast, then he will seem somewhat impartial.
But one good thing,
you wouldn’t have to listed to Pat Foley! I’m not really a fan of Emrick, but anybody, almost even the Nashville guys, are preferable to Foley.

by 



















