Home Ice Advantage?
Over the all-star break I was bored and missing hockey so I decided to look into the home team winning percentage in a little more detail, since every team having a 55% home ice advantage struck me as not entirely accurate as some teams are better home teams, some are better road teams, and some just flat out can't win games.
What I did was compile all of the games from the 2006-07 season to the current season, and here are the results:
|
HW% |
HPTS% |
RW% |
RPTS% |
|
|
2006-07 |
0.550 |
0.607 |
0.450 |
0.507 |
|
2007-08 |
0.537 |
0.591 |
0.463 |
0.520 |
|
2008-09 |
0.559 |
0.618 |
0.441 |
0.497 |
|
2009-10 |
0.561 |
0.622 |
0.439 |
0.500 |
|
2010-11 |
0.519 |
0.583 |
0.481 |
0.538 |
|
2011-12 |
0.562 |
0.620 |
0.438 |
0.492 |
And the average for all of that time is:
|
HW% |
HPTS% |
RW% |
RPTS% |
|
|
League |
0.452 |
What struck me as the most interesting here is how widely the "home ice advantage" varied from year to year. In full seasons it ranged from 51% to 56%. So then I decided to look at individual teams winning percentage. I ran a weighted average using the following equation:
HW%= ((wins from ‘06-‘07 to '10-'11)/(number of games) + 2*(wins in '11-'12)/(number of games))/3
That gave me the following for each team:
|
HW% |
HPTS% |
RW% |
RPTS% |
|
|
0.537 |
0.568 |
0.311 |
0.420 |
|
|
BOS |
0.602 |
0.650 |
0.627 |
0.648 |
|
BUF |
0.484 |
0.568 |
0.419 |
0.440 |
|
CAR |
0.506 |
0.557 |
0.284 |
0.387 |
|
CBJ |
0.385 |
0.449 |
0.254 |
0.317 |
|
CGY |
0.591 |
0.641 |
0.386 |
0.453 |
|
CHI |
0.627 |
0.688 |
0.474 |
0.528 |
|
COL |
0.533 |
0.544 |
0.460 |
0.504 |
|
DAL |
0.562 |
0.608 |
0.472 |
0.493 |
|
DET |
0.793 |
0.830 |
0.508 |
0.529 |
|
EDM |
0.496 |
0.556 |
0.271 |
0.314 |
|
FLA |
0.473 |
0.606 |
0.425 |
0.497 |
|
LAK |
0.481 |
0.551 |
0.459 |
0.569 |
|
MIN |
0.591 |
0.657 |
0.415 |
0.478 |
|
MTL |
0.429 |
0.544 |
0.436 |
0.478 |
|
NJD |
0.554 |
0.596 |
0.544 |
0.570 |
|
NSH |
0.610 |
0.668 |
0.551 |
0.580 |
|
NYI |
0.440 |
0.513 |
0.353 |
0.420 |
|
NYR |
0.633 |
0.682 |
0.588 |
0.635 |
|
OTT |
0.569 |
0.602 |
0.459 |
0.536 |
|
PHI |
0.513 |
0.583 |
0.599 |
0.644 |
|
PHX |
0.465 |
0.539 |
0.443 |
0.508 |
|
PIT |
0.612 |
0.657 |
0.535 |
0.580 |
|
SJS |
0.613 |
0.662 |
0.560 |
0.636 |
|
STL |
0.666 |
0.734 |
0.391 |
0.464 |
|
TBL |
0.575 |
0.612 |
0.326 |
0.387 |
|
TOR |
0.507 |
0.586 |
0.459 |
0.494 |
|
VAN |
0.614 |
0.675 |
0.586 |
0.614 |
|
WPG |
0.556 |
0.602 |
0.325 |
0.399 |
|
WSH |
0.682 |
0.717 |
0.393 |
0.444 |
*Winnipeg was calculated using Atlanta's record
This gave a better picture of home ice advantage, ranging from a 38.5% winning percentage (Columbus) to a 79.3% winning percentage (Detroit). From this the next step would be to calculate the winning percentage for each combination of teams. I did that using the following equation:
HW% = ((League Average)+(Home Teams Winning %)+1-(Road Teams Winning %))/3
RW% = (1-(League Average)+1-(Home Teams Win
ning %)+(Road Teams Winning %))/3
So for Detroit's next 10 games the odds are:
|
A |
H |
HW% |
APTS% |
HPTS% |
|
DET |
CGY |
0.544 |
0.519 |
0.624 |
|
DET |
VAN |
0.551 |
0.519 |
0.641 |
|
DET |
EDM |
0.512 |
0.519 |
0.581 |
|
DET |
PHX |
0.502 |
0.519 |
0.573 |
|
EDM |
DET |
0.690 |
0.412 |
0.718 |
|
ANA |
DET |
0.677 |
0.464 |
0.718 |
|
PHI |
DET |
0.581 |
0.576 |
0.718 |
|
DAL |
DET |
0.623 |
0.501 |
0.718 |
|
NSH |
DET |
0.596 |
0.544 |
0.718 |
|
SJS |
DET |
0.593 |
0.573 |
0.718 |
This seems to pass the eyeball test for me, but any thoughts or input?
2 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great writeup
My only statement on it is that I wish all games were worth the same number of points, so it would be easier to use points% as a better indicator of winning % (since right now, two teams can play a home-and-home where they each win in OT and leave their points% above .500)
by J.J. from Kansas on Jan 30, 2012 2:31 PM CST reply actions
I agree. Right now if I run those numbers out through the end of the season the wings win 7 more away games, 11 more home games but come up with 40 more points to finish second overall (behind the Rangers with 109 pts) and 1st in the Central. From these numbers the team that benefits the most from the charity point through the remainder of the season is the sharks, with a predicted 5 more charity points.

by 















