Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Morning Skate: Will History Be Made?

Which Red Wings team is going to show up tonight?

We do know they will be wearing white again this evening as the team will be sporting special Lokomotiv memorial patches on their sweaters. The game used jerseys will be sold as a fundraiser. So will this team play like the road team that usually wears white? Or will they be so determined to win another home game it doesn't matter the sweater on their backs?

Standing in their way from reaching history is the Philadelphia Flyers. One of the two franchise that holds the record the Red Wings are going after. The 1975-76 Flyers and the 1929-30 Boston Bruins are the only two other teams to win 20 straight games at home. It will be no easy task if the Wings want to join that club.

Philly is in the second toughest division in the league. They're chasing the Rangers and trying to keep the Penguins from nipping at their heels. They're one of the deepest offensive teams in the league with one of the best players in Claude Giroux. They score so many goals because the defense and goaltending has struggled this season, especially with the loss of Chris Pronger. It doesn't necessarily mean this will be a high scoring affair. The Wings tend to make mediocre goalies look like Vezina winners at times. Ilya Bryzgalov or Sergei Bobrovsky could be in for a great night. We shall see.

History may be on the line tonight, but more importantly, there are two points on the line. The Blues and Canucks keeps winning and the Wings need to do the same. Every point matters. It's the race to the playoffs and the most important thing is collecting points.

*

Broad Street Hockey is your SBNation Flyers' blog.

Puck drop is just after 7:30p ET on the NBC Sports Network.

Star-divide

The Expected Lineup

*

Johan Franzen -- Pavel Datsyuk -- Todd Bertuzzi

Valtteri Filppula -- Henrik Zetterberg - Jiri Hudler

Justin Abdelkader -- Darren Helm -- Drew Miller

Jan Mursak -- Cory Emmerton -- Tomas Holmstrom

*

Nicklas Lidstrom -- Ian White

Niklas Kronwall -- Brad Stuart

Jonathan Ericsson -- Mike Commodore/Jakub Kindl

*

Joey MacDonald (starting)

Ty Conklin

Scratches: Mike Commodore or Jakub Kindl

Injuries: Patrick Eaves (jaw), Jimmy Howard (finger) and Danny Cleary (knee)

FLYERS HOW THEY MATCH UP RED WINGS
31-17-7 (69 pts; 4th in East) Record 37-17-2 (76 pts; 1st in NHL)
3.24 (2nd in NHL) Goals Per Game 3.05 (4th in NHL)
2.91 (23rd) Goals Against Per Game 2.34 (6th)
19.7% (5th) Power Play % 17.2% (16th)
81.8% (16th) Penalty Kill % 80.9% (21st)
Scott Hartnell (26 goals) Goal Leader Johan Franzen (21 goals)
Claude Giroux (62 points) Points Leader Pavel Datsyuk (55 points)

  • The Red Wings are 46-55-21-0 (W-L-T-OTL) all-time against the Philadelphia Flyers franchise.
  • The Flyers are the NHL's best road team with an 18-8-2 record on foreign ice. This could be the Wings toughest challenge yet.
  • Sergei Bobrovsky has never faced the Wings. Meanwhile Bryzgalov is 8-8-5 all-time with 2.81 GAA and a .920 SV%. Joey MacDonald is 0-4-1 against the Flyers all-time with a 3.56 GAA and .877 SV%. If history is going to happen tonight. It'll happen for JoeyMac too.
  • The Flyers have lost four of their last five and have given up five goals or more in three of those losses. So expect a nice, close, low scoring game tonight.

PLAYER STATISTICS DURING 19-GAME HOME WIN STREAK

GOALS ASSISTS POINTS
Datsyuk 5 19 24
Filppula 7 13 20
Franzen 10
9 19
Hudler 4 11 15
Lidstrom 6 9 15
Zetterberg 6
9 15
Kronwall 7 7 14
White 2 12 14
Bertuzzi 5 8 13
Cleary 2 8 10
Miller 5 5 10
Helm 4 4 8
Holmstrom 5 3 8
Abdelkader
2 4
6
Kindl 1
4
5
Stuart
1 4 5
Emmerton 3 1 4
Ericsson 1 3 4
Conner 1 1 2
Brunnstrom 0 1 1
Eaves 0 1 1


Prediction: It's not an easy win and it's not a blowout. The Red Wings tie history with a 5-3 win. Pavel Datsyuk is your player of the game.

Let's Go Red Wings.

Comment 94 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

4-3, Flip PotG

hopefully i’ll be home from work in time to catch the 3rd.

by Pentatonic on Feb 12, 2012 11:49 AM CST reply actions  

same prediction, but i didn't see this

i hadn’t refreshed the page…but let’s hope we’re both right.
LGRW

by GreatGooglyMoogly on Feb 12, 2012 12:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Any word on a return date for Tiberius yet?

2-0, Franzen btw

by Apocalyptic0n3 on Feb 12, 2012 11:54 AM CST reply actions  

What about Eaves?

I keep looking for info, but last I heard he had a concussion too.

by celldweller on Feb 12, 2012 12:13 PM CST up reply actions  

More of the same

still dealing with concussion symptoms. No updates.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

said he was taking shots in practice the last couple of days

Yeah end of week might be a possibility

Fan of the Tigers ~ Lions ~ Red Wings! - Restoring Pride to Detroits Sports Teams
WIIM Mursak Leagues Wingedmule (109-92-39)) PoD Bench Leagues PackMules (7th)
Get better in 2012 Lions! - Thanks for a Great Season (10-7)

by MuleRules on Feb 12, 2012 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

High scoring game tonight

I’m thinking 5-4 and Pavel Datsyuk is the PoTG

Fan of the Tigers ~ Lions ~ Red Wings! - Restoring Pride to Detroits Sports Teams
WIIM Mursak Leagues Wingedmule (109-92-39)) PoD Bench Leagues PackMules (7th)
Get better in 2012 Lions! - Thanks for a Great Season (10-7)

by MuleRules on Feb 12, 2012 12:27 PM CST reply actions  

5-2, Franzen

This is gonna be one helluva game

"Goaltending is a normal job, sure. How would you like it in your job if every time you made a small mistake, a red light went on over your desk and 15,000 people stood up and yelled at you."
-Jacques Plante

by DetroitSports on Feb 12, 2012 12:52 PM CST reply actions  

Best Thing About Tonight........

Edzo on Sunday afternoon game = No Edzo on Sunday night game.
Hooray for No Edzo !

by mc keeper on Feb 12, 2012 1:29 PM CST reply actions  

I saw Edzo's son at a college hockey game recently

Penn vs OU. He was pretty decent. I was nice and didn’t shout bad things about his dad.

Manager of the Mursak League's Banzai Bananas. BANZAI!!!

by Dannik99 on Feb 12, 2012 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

no Pierre either!!

Fan of the Tigers ~ Lions ~ Red Wings! - Restoring Pride to Detroits Sports Teams
WIIM Mursak Leagues Wingedmule (109-92-39)) PoD Bench Leagues PackMules (7th)
Get better in 2012 Lions! - Thanks for a Great Season (10-7)

by MuleRules on Feb 12, 2012 3:06 PM CST up reply actions  

5-4 Z as PotG

I know he is in an off-season, but I see this as a chance for him to have a break-out game. I figure Joey will be beaten pretty bad this time around. Philly’s offense is potent (which is why my fantasy team is doing so well).

Manager of the Mursak League's Banzai Bananas. BANZAI!!!

by Dannik99 on Feb 12, 2012 1:43 PM CST reply actions  

this is crap

the game isnt even televised for wow basic cable subscribers, i rarely get to watch wings games with my work/school schedule and when i do get to watch them its always on tsn or vs or nbcsports, whats fsd playing tonight? the crappy pistons who i refuse to watch a game of until dumars makes that team relevant again, whats fsd+ showing? pac-12 basketball, what the hell? this is detroit not LA, show something relative to our location, not some crap-12 basketball

by stanx2005 on Feb 12, 2012 2:09 PM CST reply actions  

Cable sucks

Last year I had DirectTV, so I didn’t get any VS games. I feel your pain. Now I pay a shitton of money for Comcast. I think next year I’ll look into online alternatives for streaming.

by shanny14 on Feb 12, 2012 3:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Check NBCSports.com

I know they stream their Sunday day games. Not sure if they stream their NBCSN games too.

Brendan Smith fan

by JeffHancock41 on Feb 12, 2012 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I don’t think they stream NBCSN games. super frustrating that it’s so damn hard to watch NHL games legally. I dropped $$$ on NHL gamecenter, but any game that’s on NBC, NBCSN, or NHL-N is blacked out. The last 2 games were blackouts. I’m trying to do the right thing and pay them, but they keep adding blackouts.

by gump.worsley on Feb 12, 2012 5:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah NBCSpotrts.com will not be streaming.

Joe Yerdon of ProHockeyTalk confirmed. Only the Saturday/Sunday day games get the nod.

Brendan Smith fan

by JeffHancock41 on Feb 12, 2012 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

VPN

If you have Gamecenter Online you can just use a VPN from Europe and watch an game that is blacked out where you live. It works really well. You just link to the VPN and then go to Gamecenter as normal.

by Bonobnuggies on Feb 12, 2012 10:04 PM CST up reply actions  

enjoy this one without me classies

6-5 Detroit, Valtteri Filppula.

You wanna tell me that to mah face?!

by uvgt2bkdnme on Feb 12, 2012 2:28 PM CST via iPhone app reply actions  

3-2 Wings, POG Z

I keep predicting Z to have a breakout night…and he will soon!

by wingsluver4ever on Feb 12, 2012 3:26 PM CST reply actions  

in honor of JJ's

elegant refutation of the idea the Philadelphia’s win streak is superior to the Detroit’s over at Broad Street Hockey, I’m predicting this year’s Red Wings would beat the 75-76 Flyers 6-1. A Shooter Tutor would get the win and POTG honors for Detroit.

The Aristocratic Deciding Foolish No. 1 Guy
twitter: @wizardofcorsica

by Wizard of Corsica on Feb 12, 2012 3:50 PM CST reply actions  

I think you missed Travis's point

The point is not which team would win if they met on the ice today (and the 75-76 Flyers suddenly aged back 36 years). No one cares about that.

The point is the rules which the Flyers achieved 20 straight home wins are no longer the rules. And under the rules in which the 75-76 Flyers (and the 29-30 Bruins) did it, the Red Wings streak would have been snapped at 12 when they needed a shootout. Back then, such games would have ended in ties and the win streak (which the Flyers had; they won 20 straight at home, it was not just a streak of not losing) would have ended If the Flyers ever finished overtime still tied, that would have been it and the streak would have been ended.

Because of Bettman’s rule changes, the two streaks are apples and oranges. Going 20 straight at home without a loss is an impressive feat and something you should celebrate, just don’t think you are doing the same thing the 75-76 Flyers did or the 29-30 Bruins did. Because you are not. The shootout took care of that.

Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Feb 12, 2012 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

It very well may be apples and oranges, but the tone from Travis wasn’t that, it was that apples taste better than oranges.

I disagree with that idea.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 4:12 PM CST up reply actions  

^^ this, however is true.

The Aristocratic Deciding Foolish No. 1 Guy
twitter: @wizardofcorsica

by Wizard of Corsica on Feb 12, 2012 4:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I was totally a joking

and am looking forward to a good game tonight.

The Aristocratic Deciding Foolish No. 1 Guy
twitter: @wizardofcorsica

by Wizard of Corsica on Feb 12, 2012 4:13 PM CST up reply actions  

funny thing

is, you’re the only troll who is spewing venom about the DIFFERENCES between the two streaks. we Wings fans do not care if the streaks are similar or not. WE KNOW there are different rules in place between the two eras and are content with things for how they are. apparently justin f. you are not. which is fine. live and let live. we Wings fans don’t care so long as the Wings continue to win at home regardless of how the Wings get the two points so long as they get the two points. so justin just relax a little, have a beer, watch your team battle ours tonight and have fun…life is too short to be so anal about things.

"Blood washes off, brusies go away, bones do heal, scars indicate character, pain is only temporary, but victory will last FOREVER!"

by wjr on Feb 12, 2012 5:26 PM CST up reply actions  

If I can add some more facts and observations

First of all, if we weren’t playing you tonight I’d say good luck in tying it.

J.J. brought up travel. The Flyers had 12 road trips during their streak, though two of them were single-game excursions to New York, so really only 10. The Red Wings have had 11. The Flyers had two five-game trips, one to the West Coast (four of the five games). The Wings have had three trips to the West Coast. So the Red Wings travel was greater, but I think it’s a weak argument that this balances out the fact that games ended in ties then.

Also, 16 of the games were won by Wayne Stephenson or his backup. Bernie Parent spent most of the year injured. During the streak we also lost All-Star Rick MacLeish, our 50-goal scorer and probably the third best center in Flyers history. I know Howard’s been hurt, but if you want to use two extra West Coast trips to try to make the oranges taste better I’ll trade you those for losing two of your four best players.

The All-Star break was much shorter then. The Flyers played on Sunday. Six of their 18 skaters played in the All-Star game on Tuesday. Then they played again on Thursday.

As for strength of opponents, the Flyers won 5 of their 20 against the four other premier teams in the league and 12 against teams with above .500 records (when that actually meant something Before Bettman). They won one game each against the dregs, Washington and Kansas City. Their road schedule during that stretch was about as difficult as their home games.
My quick count shows 11 of the 19 Red Wings wins against teams that are not in the playoffs, as of today. That’s a considerable difference in strength of schedule.

The only reason the Flyers streak ended was because the season was over. They won their first four playoff games at home, in regulation. So the streak really was 24.

Oh. 25. We beat the Soviets in perhaps the game of the year for hockey.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 5:36 PM CST up reply actions  

The All-Star break was much shorter then. The Flyers played on Sunday. Six of their 18 skaters played in the All-Star game on Tuesday. Then they played again on Thursday.

That All-Star game was in Philly, too.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Are you saying that this counterbalances the fact that 2/3 of the team only got three days rest and 1/3 of the team none at all?

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 5:45 PM CST up reply actions  

No rest? NONE AT ALL?

There was a day off before and after the game and don’t forget that it was the All-Star game.

If you can produce any evidence of an NHLer saying anything about being tired after an All-Star game, I’d like to see that produced.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok. Are you saying that the difference in rest days between then and now, and the fact that 33% of the Flyers had to show up for the game, is not a quantitative difference?

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 5:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I am absolutely saying that.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:51 PM CST up reply actions  

So a five-day break toward the end of the streak is the same as a three-day break at the beginning. Ok.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 5:56 PM CST up reply actions  

So that’s all the difference?

Here’s a quantity:

Flyers streak took place during 40 total games over 90 days (0.44444 games/day)
Detroit’s has been 45 total games over 99 days (0.45454545)

Quantitatively, the Flyers had more rest.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:59 PM CST up reply actions  

If in order to bolster your argument you don’t want to include the Flyers game against the Soviet Army team ok. Add that in and the Flyers number is perhaps a thousandth of a point higher.

And I would argue again that a single five-day rest toward the end of the streak is more meaningful than a three-day rest at the beginning.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:04 PM CST up reply actions  

and I would argue that there’s meaning in having three trips to the west coast versus one and a 7,300 mile travel difference.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:06 PM CST up reply actions  

So your argument is that the extra travel counterbalances:

the significant difference in strength in opponents
the two major injuries
the long rest during the all-star break for the Wings
the fact that ties don’t exist anymore.

I think it’s a poor argument.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Significant difference in strength of opponents

the Flyers had a +138 goal differential that season. No team has had a differential that high since 1995-96. The strength of opponent argument favors the Red Wings. There were two great teams in the NHL, a bunch of marginal teams, and two absolutely awful squads.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:11 PM CST up reply actions  

If you focus on the 20 games during the streaks, you will find that the Red Wings opponents, relative to the league average, are considerably below the level that the Flyers played against during their 20 games. If you want to arbitrarily “marginalize” eight or nine teams to help support your argument, again, it’s very very weak.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Relative to league average

that’s fine… the league average is much higher now than it was during the 1975-76 season.

I have very little doubt that the dregs in the NHL now are better teams than the league average back then. It is harder to win an NHL game nowadays because all of the teams are better.

In reality, I’m arbitrarily marginalizing 16 teams from that NHL. Mostly because they were marginal and that year’s Flyers and Canadiens squads were much better than the average teams than the NHL’s best teams are now.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:20 PM CST up reply actions  

To say “I’m arbitrarily margnializing 16 teams” from any year in the NHL is beyond weak. It’s absurd. It’s impossible to continue a reasoned discussion from that stance.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Then feel free to shut it

Because the opinion remains that the average team in the NHL nowadays is significantly better than the average team in the 70s.

Hell, the opinion remains that the most awful teams of today are better than the average team from the 70s. That season had two exceptional teams and 16 also-rans. It’s a different league now. Congrats to the Flyers for winning their one home game against the Canadiens during that streak (as well as the other home game they played against the Habs), but for the most part, they played significantly easier teams to beat.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course they are. They’re faster, stronger, etc. Since when did this become the argument? This is moving the goalposts.

As for the difference between rich and poor, it would make sense that a salary cap would close that gap. But the Flyers didn’t feast on the bottom half of the league during that streak, as the Wings have. You can ignore that. You can arbitrarily dismiss 90% of the teams the Flyers played as dregs. You can think that makes your argument stronger.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Again, you are not clear on the term

The goalposts remain fixed – the Flyers had easier competition. It’s easier to avoid ties against easier competition. The Flyers’ streak is not a level above what the Wings have accomplished. Please stop using terms you don’t seem to grasp.

The Wings have played better teams during their streak. That’s what I believe and that’s what strengthens my argument. You can think otherwise.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:34 PM CST up reply actions  

You are completely ignoring differences in relative strength between teams playing at the same time and instead making arguments about overall strength of players between eras. Those are goalposts being moved.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:36 PM CST up reply actions  

The travel thing

The difference (by plane) is over 7,300 miles traveled. That is no small amount.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:46 PM CST up reply actions  

No, it’s not. It’s three one-way flights from Philadelphia to Vancouver. Are you going to argue that this balances out the fact that games ended in ties then?

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 5:51 PM CST up reply actions  

How often have you flown from Philadelphia to Vancouver in order to play professional hockey?

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I can ask you the same question. If that’s the way we determine its importance, and you’ve never done that, then how do you know it’s not a small amount?

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 5:54 PM CST up reply actions  

How about the fact that part of the NHLPA’s reason for putting the kibosh on the realignment had to do with travel concerns?

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:56 PM CST up reply actions  

You can believe that is the factual reason, and not that it was a political move by the union and Fehr to show resistance for this summer. I’ll disagree.

I think it’s a weak argument that the Red Wings travel equalizes the fact that ties don’t exist.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Players have been complaining about travel for years and you want to write it off as just-now political posturing?

That’s an impressive level of dismissal.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:09 PM CST up reply actions  

The fact that travel is of concern to the players doesn’t mean it wasn’t a leverage point for the union. There’s nothing impressive or dismissive about that view.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:10 PM CST up reply actions  

The fact that travel is of concern to the players is EXACTLY WHAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT.

The original argument was that travel makes a difference. The players’ view on this supports this. The entire argument about political posturing was yours and it is an unrelated argument.

Are you saying that the players are straight up lying when they say that travel makes a difference? That’s what this part of the discussion boils down to.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:13 PM CST up reply actions  

I said travel is a concern for the players. I actually said that. Look at my last comment, or you can ignore it if it interferes with what you want to believe i said.

So the rest of this last comment doesn’t make sense and is best skipped, because it’s based on something you think I said that I didn’t.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:21 PM CST up reply actions  

So you concede my point

that 7,300 miles is no small amount?

Thank you for taking so long to come around to that. Perhaps if you weren’t being intentionally obtuse just to be difficult, we could have accomplished that much faster.

Now if you want to discuss political posturing vis-a-vis CBA negotiations, I would welcome you to start a fanpost here and we can do that. Until then, moving goalposts has no use in this thread.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I’m not conceding the point that 7,300 miles of travel balances the existence of ties. That has been my claim from the beginning. There has been nothing obtuse about it. It’s been very clear.

You brought in the NHLPA. You asked the intentionally sarcastic question of whether I’ve actually flied to Vancouver to play professional hockey. How is that not moving the goalposts, or burning them down for that matter?

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:26 PM CST up reply actions  

The argument has move far beyond whether the 7,300 miles by itself makes all the difference. I think you’ll find that’s not my claim. I’m saying it makes a difference. The point was that 7,300 is no small difference.

I brought in the NHLPA as a throwaway piece of a comment to back up my opinion that players are concerned about travel, you chose to run with that in a useless direction.

As for the sarcastic question moving the goalposts? I’m not sure you’re clear on the term.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:29 PM CST up reply actions  

You change the subject to ask whether I’ve actually traveled to Vancouver. You take a discussion about hockey and make it sarcastic and personal. That’s moving the goalposts from a discussion about something outside of oneself to something personal. That kind of change can derail a discussion much more quickly than moving the goalposts about the facts.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:33 PM CST up reply actions  

You can believe that I started to make it personal if you want. You’re wrong, but feel free to believe that. In the end, it doesn’t matter. The strength of your argument matters and yours isn’t that strong.

If that derailed the discussion, then shame on you for allowing that to happen.

The conversation is at an impasse for now. The game is about to start and I don’t want to spend the rest of the night in this thread discussing what does and doesn’t constitute moving goalposts.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:36 PM CST up reply actions  

You brought up moving goalposts, not me. I’ve given you two or three instances and you’re not responding to them, rather moving around to another topic as it suits you. Perhaps you don’t find the comment “How often have you flown from Philadelphia to Vancouver to play professional hockey” to not be sarcastic and an invitation to respond in kind. I don’t believe it.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Here's a question

the 70-71 Bruins also went to 19.

A home winning streak of at least 19 games happened TWICE in the 70s and hasn’t happened since. How do you balance that into the argument that it’s supposedly now EASIER to accomplish?

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:54 PM CST up reply actions  

If you want to argue that two instances of something within six years is statistically worth discussing as some kind of trend we’ll disagree about that too.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 6:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I want to hear a reasoning about how it’s supposedly easier to accomplish that many consecutive home victories. You still have to actually win the shootout.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 6:02 PM CST up reply actions  

God I hope the Wings win, in the interest of ensuring a zesty radio show.

The Aristocratic Deciding Foolish No. 1 Guy
twitter: @wizardofcorsica

by Wizard of Corsica on Feb 12, 2012 6:03 PM CST up reply actions  

4-2 Wings, PotG White

Go Wings!!! and Go Blue!!! Forever!!!

by KGW on Feb 12, 2012 3:59 PM CST reply actions  

5-2 Red Wings

Datsyuk is POTG – although the score says different, I think it’ll be a tight affair, with the Wings getting three in the 3rd to break a 2-2 tie and tie the all-time record.

"Need more shoot" Pavel Datsyuk

by Kendal on Feb 12, 2012 4:00 PM CST reply actions  

4-3 Wings, Franzen

Feed the Mule. Also, start Commie because I’m about 90% sure of a fight tonight.

by EthrDemon on Feb 12, 2012 4:01 PM CST reply actions  

3-2

The third line will be the PotG! Hopefully the Bell Tire Power Play can pull through tonight as well.

by G-nizzle on Feb 12, 2012 4:23 PM CST reply actions  

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/chicago-blackhawks-seven-game-losing-streak-bad-everybody-221200425.html;_ylt=AugttgMrIHk24_p4dj2Q1297vLYF

Just to keep things in perspective, there’s a pretty good read. Comments are funny.

Living in Chicago is great... apart from the Blackhawks fans.

by Cornelious on Feb 12, 2012 4:24 PM CST reply actions  

link is broken

tried clicking on your posted link but it only brings up this page…thought you would like to know.

"Blood washes off, brusies go away, bones do heal, scars indicate character, pain is only temporary, but victory will last FOREVER!"

by wjr on Feb 12, 2012 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

mighty blackhawks strike again!

and how about those blackhawks? guess they’re not the class of the conference after all. shitty defense and swisscheese goaltending equals exactly what they’re going through. if they need defensive help, they ought to consider trading patrick kane cause he doesn’t believe in backchecking, forchecking, or playing defense. the hawks have gotten rid of enough talented guys the last two seasons and now kane’s maladies are showing through. note to blackhawks…you can NEVER EVER NEVER score enough goals while letting in similar amounts and still expect to win. don’t exactly know what they’re thinking but they’re about to miss the playoffs.

"Blood washes off, brusies go away, bones do heal, scars indicate character, pain is only temporary, but victory will last FOREVER!"

by wjr on Feb 12, 2012 4:59 PM CST reply actions  

I would be absolutely SHOCKED if Chicago misses the playoffs.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 12, 2012 5:04 PM CST up reply actions  

honestly JJ, I wouldn't be shocked at all

if the hawks missed the playoffs. last season was no fluke for them. they had less horses then the previous season, and this season they have even less horses then they did last season. let’s not forget the power struggle between bowman and quenville about what sort of team the hawks should be and then figure into all of that the injury situations they’re encountering. just because dale tallon modeled the hawks after the wings doesn’t mean the people after him have the same game plan. we’ll see how it shakes out for sure, but chicago is going to need some help to get into the playoffs again. only this time, I’m thinking the other teams aren’t going to help them out.

"Blood washes off, brusies go away, bones do heal, scars indicate character, pain is only temporary, but victory will last FOREVER!"

by wjr on Feb 12, 2012 5:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I get less and less shocked by the notion with each passing game. We’ll see what happens when they finally get home again though.

The Aristocratic Deciding Foolish No. 1 Guy
twitter: @wizardofcorsica

by Wizard of Corsica on Feb 12, 2012 5:31 PM CST up reply actions  

they’re getting close to meltdown in Chicago. It would still be shocking but there are leaks in net, special teams, and team defense.

/s, more often than not

by flyersfaninchicago on Feb 12, 2012 5:42 PM CST up reply actions  

speaking of streaks

the streak, as it is known, is on the line again tonight. thank god they brought joey mac up. conklin was looking so fucking helpless in net I swear I was about to take up drinking again! regardless of what happens this evening, I hope the wings realize they need to continue to outwork their opponents (regardless of what city the team is from) and play like the most desperate hockey players who’ve ever played the game! this time of year is also known as the home stretch for good reason. keep winning and the wings will have home ice advantadge throughout the playoffs. teams will be totally intimidated having to come into the joe and try and beat the wings who’ve been pretty unbeatable at home.

"Blood washes off, brusies go away, bones do heal, scars indicate character, pain is only temporary, but victory will last FOREVER!"

by wjr on Feb 12, 2012 5:05 PM CST reply actions  

3-2 Wings, Pavs POTG

make it 20 boys

I like to Dangle Dangle.

by playboyperry509 on Feb 12, 2012 5:29 PM CST reply actions  

and as I've said before,

I don’t give a shit who the player of the game is…just win, get the two points, and move forward from there. the way philly has been playing lately it would be good to come out buzzing hard at them early on. keep the play in their end of the ice cuz if they can’t spend time in our end, they can’t score! LGRW!!! LGRW!!! LGRW!!!

"Blood washes off, brusies go away, bones do heal, scars indicate character, pain is only temporary, but victory will last FOREVER!"

by wjr on Feb 12, 2012 5:29 PM CST reply actions  

4-3 Detroit, Miller PotG

Looking for “the other Miller” to have another game tonight on the big stage. Love this guy. Gets the winner and an assist…

by Jason T on Feb 12, 2012 5:49 PM CST reply actions  

Let's Go Red Wings!!

Detroit native deep in the heart of Texas.

by Joe Bagazinski on Feb 12, 2012 6:42 PM CST reply actions  

1-3-1 in the neutral zone?

I specifically remember the Flyers refusing to play against the Lightning a few months ago because they were doing that…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjXclnt1wAI

Detroit native deep in the heart of Texas.

by Joe Bagazinski on Feb 12, 2012 6:47 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Detroit Red Wings.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Rafiki_small
Red Wings with a shot at the 2012-2013 Calder Trophy
De_small
Should we Re-sign Abby? Am I the only one?
Small
Parise vs Suter
Small
Reasons why the 2011-12 Detroit Red Wings season was great
Small
What's next on Defense?
Small
More Thoughts on What Went Wrong
Small
Corey Perry? Strange coincidence
Small
Anyone else getting scared of the worst-case-scenario?
Epic_sax_guy_plz_by_epicsaxguyplz-d31pmuj_small
Great Moments in St. Louis Sports History
Small
Looking beyond next year...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


The Gentlemen

Images_small J.J. from Kansas

Simpsonsabbey_small Amerinadian

Dsc07546_small JeffHancock41

Editor

Jabdelkadercamp08_small stripe

Author

Small Robocop

Photochop Guru

Whiteknight_small Josh Howard