I'll See Your Two Joes and Raise You A Joey: Red Wings 3 - Sharks 2
As Wing fans, we get used to our team being the dominant one in any given matchup. Sure, an opponent may have won a couple of recent meetings, but the Wings have been so good for so long that there are very instances where the Wings are the true underdog.
The San Jose Sharks represent one of this situations. Winners of 5 straight regular season meetings and the team that has ended the Wings' last 2 seasons, the Sharks have set up camp in the Wings' heads so much they're paying rent.
When last these teams met, the Sharks dominated the Wings in every aspect of the game, leading Mike Babcock to challenge the team and ask whether they want to be a good team or not. That game marked the Wings 7th regulation loss of the season in only the Wings' 17th game; in the 43 games since that meeting (including today), the Wings have only lost 10 games in regulation. I'd say the Wings responded favourably to Babcock's challenge.
An even first period saw few good scoring chances as both teams tried to remain patient defensively. Henrik Zetterberg opened the scoring when his backhand eluded Antti Niemi. Given the history of the Sharks and Wings and how well San Jose has played against Detroit, getting an early lead was crucial to the Wings' chances of victory.
The second period saw a parade of Wings to the penalty box as the referees decided that they wanted to showcase what they do on Hockey Day in America. Some of these penalties were actually deserved, but the Wings were able to kill off the first 3 penalties, getting a goal from Drew Miller after the 2nd Sharks' power play expired. However, giving the Sharks opportunity after opportunity proved to be harmful to the Wings as Logan Couture "scored" the Sharks' first goal. Truthfully, he didn't do anything except flail away aimlessly at a bouncing puck, and only got credit when Justin Abdelkader inadvertently knocked the puck in his own net, cutting the Wings' lead to 1.
After some initial pressure by the Sharks to start the third period, the Wings slowly took over control of the game, tilting the ice to the Sharks' end. Darren Helm restored the Wings' 2-goal lead by converting a gorgeous pass from Drew Miller, and came close on several occasions to taking an even bigger lead. However, Patrick Marleau potted a loose puck with about 5 minutes left to make us all sweat. But that was as close as the Sharks would get, and for the first time in their last 6 regular season meetings, the Wings emerged victorious against San Jose.
- I'll say what all of us that were inside the "other games" territories are thinking: NBC blew it big time by not allowing the other games to be shown on TV. I pay good money for Center Ice, and to be forced to watch the game on my crappy laptop instead of my HDTV that is in the same room as my very comfortable couch makes me very angry. Then a series of events ensues that ends with me having cats with dog collars (or something like that, according to every satellite commercial on TV right now).
- Notwithstanding the terrible call against him in the first period, Todd Bertuzzi seems to be taking this "Big Bad Bertuzzi" nickname to heart with his play recently. It was another game of off-target passes, lack of physical engagement and just general poor play. Johan Franzen didn't add much to this game either, leading me to wonder if Babcock ever rewards Datsyuk with linemates who can display some consistency.
- I'm no conspiracy nut. I don't believe that there is a desire for any referee or official associated with the NHL to consciously influence the outcome of a game. That will not prevent me from complaining about the referees, who were horribly inconsistent for most of this game.
- I defy anyone to name a better third line currently in the NHL that is better than Miller-Helm-Abdelkader. You know what? Don't even bother trying. It won't happen.
- When Jimmy Howard's injury was announced, and it was determined he was going to miss games, I looked at the schedule and thought the Wing should be able to navigate this little stretch without losing too much ground. Then Ty Conklin shit the bed against Edmonton and in came Joey MacDonald, and I hedged my expectations to hope the team would go .500 until Howard gets back. All Joey has done is gone 6-1-1 in his 8 games, posting a SV% of .934 and a GAA of 1.66. If he was playing in St Louis, those would be All-Star numbers.
- Happy Hockey Day in America to all of our American readers.
After a homestand in which the Wings took 12 out of a possible 12 points, they leave for 1 game to come to my current hometown of Chicago to take on the surging Blackhawks. For those in the area, the Red Wings will be hosting a social media get-together at Tin Lizzie in the city. Here's the details, and if you're lucky, you may get to meet yours truly. I'll be the tall good-looking guy with no hair in the Red Wing shirt.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Miller-Helm-Abdelkader FTW!
Overall it looks like another solid win. Although figures I’d have to work early the only time the wings play before 10AM.
WIIM Mursak League - Oregon Chumps
by SonicSpeed on Feb 19, 2012 3:55 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Was at the game...
And flew there all the way from CA. Amazing.
"My chances? Always good chances." -- Pavel Datsyuk
by lania on Feb 19, 2012 4:07 PM CST via Android app reply actions 2 recs
This made me laugh
If he was playing in St Louis, those would be All-Star numbers.
Though I do believe you missed a few superfluous u’s in there
Joey Mac played amazing in this game
Especially in the second period, he was under siege for a while and he easily could have let a couple of goals in then that no one would have blamed him for. Absolutely inspired play.
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance baffle them with bullshit
Echoes of Jimmy
On that glove save. I miss him, but Mac officially has swagger now, as he should.
Relentlessly preaching the word of TPH and converting the heathens in the NHL wasteland that is Oregon.
you might wanna mention the recap on the official nhl site. what an excuse of a writer that brian hedger guy is. ridiculous.
Being familiar with a lot of his work (and his Twitter feed)
I actually like Brian Hedger as a writer.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 19, 2012 4:41 PM CST up reply actions
To be honest I think the entire article seems now to be rewritten with new stuff like interview bits in it and so on. Is that standard procedure? I could have sworn a few minutes ago there was an intro from him which paraphrased went something like “if you can’t beat em, shoot the pucks at em” and barely hang on.
Yeah, it's been rewritten
It actually is a fairly common practice. There’s a lot of pressure to be very quick with the replay and then to just flesh it out as postgame stuff happens.
Also, from following Hedger on Twitter, I do believe he took the criticism he was receiving on the way he wrote that article to heart. He’s very reasonable as long as people approach him reasonably.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 19, 2012 5:11 PM CST up reply actions
Officiating
I want to preface by saying I did not watch the game today so I am not influenced by what happened specifically.
In the regular season there seem to be 3 phases of officiating in every game:
1st phase: Setting the level – here the refs will be trying to call things the way they think it should be called, they won’t pay special attention to how the game is going and if one team is being penalized a lot more than the other. During this phase it is not uncommon to see one team be victimized (the rare occasions where things are balanced it is either because the refs are being really bad or really good).
2nd phase: Randomness – this typically starts some time during the 2nd period, but can start as late the middle of the 3rd. The refs will try to balance their calls so as to not give one team an advantage and in games where one team plays dirty and the other doesn’t that means you will often see a dirty play go unpunished because that team had the last short handed situation and then a minute later an interference call is made against a guy who didn’t actually touch anyone else. If the teams are pretty even in terms of actual offenses you will often see refs try to call power plays almost back to back in different directions.
3rd phase: Hiding – in this phase the refs try to pretend they are not actually at a hockey game at all. This typically begins about 10 minutes into the 3rd in a close game and may never happen in a game that is out of hand by the early 3rd period, refs will just stick their whistle away, in the off chance that a penalty is called it will always be on the team that is down by a goal and in a tie the away team, if the away team is down by a goal then nothing short of a player being decapitated can put them in the power play and then only for 2 minutes.
It is blindingly frustrating trying to find a line, something that is a slashing call in the 1st period is let go in the 3rd, the same goes for holding, hooking, tripping and roughing.
What dialect of English is this...
the Wings have only lost 10 losses in regulation.
I like pointing out mistakes :) But great write-up.
"Pavel Datsyuk is Magic."
Ha
I rewrote that sentence about 4 times, and that’s probably the best wording. I think I’ll change it to something a little more intelligentible.
So glad the Wings won today.
Watching the home games, hearing and seeing that crowd so elated with this team, watching this team play their game, man…
LGRW!
"I'll smile in June."
by Lords of Olympia on Feb 19, 2012 5:21 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Surprised Helm wasn't one of the PotG selections
Throughout all of the SJ PPs, Helm was the player on either team getting the bulk of scoring chances, plus he got a goal eventually.
Fan of the Detroit Tigers, Lions and Red Wings.
Couture goal
Ok, maybe someone can help me with this.
Does the puck going off Abdelkader nullify the high stick by Couture? Or was the ruling that Miller, and not Couture, was the one to play it with a high stick?
Either way a fluky play, it would just help to get a little better explanation from Toronto to know why the ruling was what it was.
Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen
Abby's stick would have nullified Couture's
It was definitely a good goal.
Pierre McGuire is a blithering dimwit.
I've always kind of hated that interpretation of the rules
You can’t kick or high-stick a puck into the net… unless you high stick it directly at the other guy, it hits him, and goes in. Yeah’ that’s cool.
If the point is to not allow people to score with those means because they’re dangerous, then you shouldn’t be able to score like that via incidental deflection either.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 20, 2012 9:35 AM CST up reply actions
Should have been nullified because Abby hit it with a high stick, I say
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Feb 20, 2012 10:13 AM CST up reply actions
Per rule 80
When a puck has been contacted by a high stick, the play shall be permitted to continue, provided that:
(i) the puck has been batted to an opponent (when a player bats the puck to an opponent, the Referee shall give the "washout" signal immediately. Otherwise, he will stop the play).
(ii) a player of the defending side shall bat the puck into his own goal in which case the goal shall be allowed.
Here’s the link. It was a good goal.
by Amerinadian on Feb 20, 2012 11:17 AM CST up reply actions
So then the next question
Does the puck bouncing off a defender still count, or does there need to be intent to hit it?
Watching the replay, one angle it looks like Abs accidentally hits it while falling forward, and then another angle it looks like he’s swinging at it and knocks it in.
Not saying Toronto did or didn’t screw it up, just trying to better understand the rules.
And so when this goes against the Wings on a goal in 2 weeks, I can scream bloody murder about it.Dancing Datsyuk Decidedly Dazzles Dainty Defensemen

by 

















